HELP!!! Do you weigh your meat cooked or uncooked?

124»

Replies

  • It took 5 min. To stop laughing about children breast. Child welfare needs to make a home visit to see if her children still have their breast. Since she likes to eat children breast. Just kidding, that was so funny!
  • I was so hoping a exercise guru or Alton Brown would have given an answer! I still don't know which is better raw or cooked.Alton where are you?
  • FredDoyle
    FredDoyle Posts: 2,272 Member
    I don't understand the confusion. The most accurate in my opinion is raw weight.
    Here's why:
    I take two identical pieces of sirloin which weigh 300 grams each. They have the exact same raw value and macro profile.
    I cook mine medium rare and my wife's well done.
    Now the cooked weight of mine is 250 grams, but my wife's is 200 grams (It lost more water)..
    If you use the cooked values, one of those same pieces of meat will be logged incorrectly.
    The same goes for chicken. I like mine just cooked but still juicy. She likes hers almost powdered I call it. :)
    To me it only makes logical sense to weigh raw.
  • Pirate_chick
    Pirate_chick Posts: 1,216 Member
    I weigh it cooked, subtracting an ounce from the raw serving size.
  • lisele03
    lisele03 Posts: 133 Member
    http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/

    I like this website where you can determine the cals and nutrients of many foods whether raw or cooked. These are often already listed in the MFP database. I generally weigh my meat/veggies cooked when it’s feasible since the cals and nutrients definitely change after cooking (although not always by much.) When it’s not feasible (like a casserole) I weigh the raw ingredients. I don’t think either method is “wrong” I just think weighing after cooking is slightly more accurate since that is generally how we ingest it. My tip: Don’t sweat the details too much - If we’re being THAT exact about our intake – we’ll all be successful…..!
  • FredDoyle
    FredDoyle Posts: 2,272 Member


    I like this website where you can determine the cals and nutrients of many foods whether raw or cooked. These are often already listed in the MFP database. I generally weigh my meat/veggies cooked when it’s feasible since the cals and nutrients definitely change after cooking (although not always by much.) When it’s not feasible (like a casserole) I weigh the raw ingredients. I don’t think either method is “wrong” I just think weighing after cooking is slightly more accurate since that is generally how we ingest it. My tip: Don’t sweat the details too much - If we’re being THAT exact about our intake – we’ll all be successful…..!
    It's not more accurate for the exact reason I posted two posts above yours. I guess people just post and don't read.
    That said, I'm just a nerd for accuracy and if you are losing weight as you intended, your method is working so don't sweat it.
  • formerfatboy1
    formerfatboy1 Posts: 76 Member
    I have been weighing my food cooked for the past couple of years and steady dropping weight. Its really no biggie IMO just as long as you weigh your food.
    The app on my phone has the barcode scanner so you can scan the code and all the info will pop up for that serving. after a while of doing this you will train yourself to know which is which and how much your average portion size should look. Good Luck!
  • JoyeII
    JoyeII Posts: 240 Member
    I weigh my meats cooked. I only have one scale and I don't want to contaminate it with raw meats especially chicken. I do wash it, but I don't want to wash it several times every time I eat.

    Put the meat on a plate. No contamination necessary.
  • I had the same question so I contacted foster farms who sells boneless skinless chicken breasts at costco. The rep who emailed me back stated the norm for nutritional values are based on how the product is sold unless it states otherwise. So if you buy raw chicken you weigh it raw. If you buy cooked meat it is of course is the weight cooked. Hope this helps sorry if you now have to cut the protein intake back a little.
  • EvgenyP
    EvgenyP Posts: 19 Member
    lol @ measuring cooked meats. no wonder some people have troubles losing weight.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • alereck
    alereck Posts: 343 Member
    ebdavey wrote: »
    On the idea of cooking adding calories... I'm a biochemist... ive read various articles (including the one posted by ddoeren84). I suspect that this is a red herring... Calorific values are calculated using a bomb calorimeter - basically the test item is burned completely and the output energy measured. quote]
    -
    - I've always wondered how it was measured but never took the time to research it. Thank you for the info.
  • alereck
    alereck Posts: 343 Member
    loriq41 wrote: »
    I have always weighed mine cooked and obviously not a biggie as I have lost 42 lbs..so there ya go.

    There you go. Whatever works. I cook big meals for my family and I don't always know how much I'll feel like eating. So I measure all my food cooked, what goes on the plate. Never stopped me from dropping them pounds.
  • brookechooka89
    brookechooka89 Posts: 3 Member
    Initially, I do both. I weigh it raw and then I cook it and weigh it again. Then I make an entry under My Foods with the weight it was cooked yielding from the weight it was raw. That way, I can confidently cook the meat without weighing before every time because I already know what a serving will weigh. i do the same thing with pasta.

    I have a high school ratio math test question for you all.

    Q.1.: If I have 1.8kg of raw roast meat

    ...then cook it

    The roast meat is now 1.2kg of cooked roast meat.

    If I measure 200g of cooked roast meat, what did it weigh raw?

    What is the calculation?

    A: (1800g / 1200g) x 200g = 300g

    Ratio: 1800:1200 = 3:2

    Therefore the cooked 200g of meat was actually 300g of raw meat.

    Yes, you would need to weigh raw first, then cook and then weigh again. But if you want to know how to work it out and be confident with what weight you are logging, then there it is.

    It's all well and good to weigh raw food, but when you're cooking roast meats, it's hard to feel like you're not just guessing / over estimating / under estimating.

    I like to eat what's on my plate without feeling guilty that I've under calculated. I'm also a bit OCD when weighing so I like to be fairly close to the mark.

    I hope this has helped atleast 1 person out there :)
  • whmscll
    whmscll Posts: 2,255 Member
    What if you are cooking a pound of lean ground turkey because you don't have time to cook every day but you only eat some of it every day in your tacos? How do you measure that raw?

  • R222i
    R222i Posts: 11 Member
    I encounter the same problem with brown rice! Do I measure it dry or cooked??like 195g or 1cup of cooked brown rice or uncooked ?? Help
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    Oh dear Lord. My head is pounding after reading all of these replies. :cold_sweat:

    I have always weighed my meat raw. Obviously it weighs less after cooking.. I would much rather overestimate than underestimate.
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    ...And if you go on page 3, there's 2 more threads on this topic.. I dare not click on those :open_mouth:
  • professionalHobbyist
    professionalHobbyist Posts: 1,316 Member
    Trim it,cook it, weigh it.

    Enter a slightly lower number in my food diary

    .... Wait, were we supposed to be honest here?

    :)
This discussion has been closed.