A Heart Rate Monitor is a must! Especailly for Women.

Options
aleecef721
aleecef721 Posts: 6
in Fitness and Exercise
I am addicted to my Polar Heart Rate monitor. For those of you women who go by the calories it says you have burned on a particular machine, boy are you in for a shock.Those machines are calabrated for men, so even though you put in your age and weight it is far from accurate. It will most likey say you have burned 100 or more calories higher then actual. I have even see as much as 300 more than I have actually burned on some machines

So if you are putting your food and exercise into this software and eating the calories it has alloted you you may be way off in some cases.

Why the Polar is accurate; when you set it up you put in your height, weight, birthday with year and your sex. You wear a chest stap that constantly monitors your heart rate. A bonus to the Polar is that it tranmits your heart rate to common gym equipment; like the Precor brand.

This device also helps you to see the progress you are making. By knowing what your heart rate is while doing activities you will know how quickly you are getting in shape as your heart rate starts to lower doing the same exercise at the same intensity.

I hope this helps and inspires people to get one. I swear by it. It has made my workouts more intense and keeps you going until you hit your target calorie goal. You say, "well I should keep going, it's only 25 more calories till I hit 500"

Good luck to you all.
«1

Replies

  • hmarshburn
    hmarshburn Posts: 8 Member
    Options
    I was just talking about HRMs yesterday. Where did you buy yours?
  • slg92088
    slg92088 Posts: 12 Member
    Options
    Mine just came in the mail today, I'm so excited!
  • stephr2014
    stephr2014 Posts: 311 Member
    Options
    Thanks for this post, I've really been thinking about purchasing a HRM.
  • njean888
    njean888 Posts: 399 Member
    Options
    You couldn't be more correct. I don't have the Polar, I have a Timex but just the same you program it with your information and wear a chest strap. Now that I have one I can't imagine ever working out without it.
  • Echoshill
    Echoshill Posts: 42 Member
    Options
    Besides common sense, an HRM is the first step toward changing from working out to training.

    I recommend TIMEX Race Elite trainer. Algorithms seem to be terrific, easy batt replacement and much less money than the Polar. But, to each their own.

    Buy on Amazon.

    Regardless of brand, always verify your calorie output with multiple sources.
  • hmrtym
    hmrtym Posts: 49 Member
    Options
    I Love love love my polar! You are completely right!
  • Nellie1drfl
    Nellie1drfl Posts: 127 Member
    Options
    Which Polar do you have, there were so many. I bought a cheepie and it worked for about 6 months, wont dothat again.
  • superstarcassie
    superstarcassie Posts: 296 Member
    Options
    i agree its a must!! The machines at the gym and the readings on MFP are usually WAY over what I would really burn. I like knowing my heart rate at all times- I am able to push myself to keep it in the cardio zone. It also helps me to not half *kitten* my workouts! :) When I see 900 calories burned in 20 mins.......I pretty much know that they are just guessing based off of MFP. Once you have one, you will be hooked!
  • LJCDuke11
    LJCDuke11 Posts: 103 Member
    Options
    OMG! I canNOT wait for my beautiful Red/Silver Polar FT7 to come in!! I paid a little more for it but I'm very color orientated and I know it will motivate me to get out and put it to work more than a plain one! Can't wait!! SUPER EXCITED!!:bigsmile:
  • dshalbert
    dshalbert Posts: 677 Member
    Options
    I so agree with Aleescef! Thanks for that post. I have a polar as well and love it. I love how it saves your work-outs and let's you know when you are in or out of you targeted heart zone. I got mine at Best Buy for about $90.00
  • JenSpinnaChick
    JenSpinnaChick Posts: 104 Member
    Options
    I've been using my Polar for 3 years now, I totally agree with you. I like that it also lets you know when you are NOT working hard enough, I've always had a misconception about that.
  • ifeelsqueaky
    ifeelsqueaky Posts: 193
    Options
    Yeah I do love my Polar HRM I must say, it's awesome :bigsmile:

    I find that the machines are inaccurate the other way though, they say I've burned less. I am finding that I am having to work so much harder to push my heart rate up - I must be getting fitter!
  • ifeelsqueaky
    ifeelsqueaky Posts: 193
    Options
    Which Polar do you have, there were so many. I bought a cheepie and it worked for about 6 months, wont dothat again.

    I have a polar F11 and it's awesome - my boyfriend has the same one and ours have never broken.
  • MonsteRawr
    MonsteRawr Posts: 95 Member
    Options
    I, too, have been considering getting a HRM. However, I'm more interested in one of the wrist models. (I'd like to be able to wear it to work, and the chest straps seems like it could lead to awkward questions.) Are the wrist HRMs as accurate as the chest ones? And which one would you recommend?
  • KelliB25
    KelliB25 Posts: 24
    Options
    I seem to have the opposite results. I got a TImex HRM for Christmas that calculates calories burned, I entered in all of my information and use the treadmill that recieves a signal from my chest strap and the Timex HRM shows almost double what the treadmill does!! I input my weight in the tredmill each time. I am at a loss on which one is correct?
  • heathersmilez
    heathersmilez Posts: 2,579 Member
    Options
    I, too, have been considering getting a HRM. However, I'm more interested in one of the wrist models. (I'd like to be able to wear it to work, and the chest straps seems like it could lead to awkward questions.) Are the wrist HRMs as accurate as the chest ones? And which one would you recommend?

    The problem with the wrist ones is you basically have to stop and hold your fingers on 2 buttons to get your HR rather than it being constantly monitored with the chest straps. Not only that it doesn't work 100% of the time. Depending on how you are holding your arm, where it is on your wrist and amount of sweat it can't always pick it up or sometimes it is crazy off. I've seen both 45, 25 minutes into a workout (and my resting is already 52 so its not possible to go lower unless I stay still in a freezing area) and 220 which is close to a heart attack but I'm breathing fine and healthy so I wasn't worried.

    I bought a wrist one just for fun, a Mio on sale for $49 was $89 recommended by Dr. Phil apparently which was funny when I read that on the box. It was just for fun to finally see what 4 years of Turbo Jam was actually burning and my company paid for it though our wellness plan. If you are serious about eating ALL your exercise calories, then to be most accurate get a chest one for about $150+. I’m buying the hubby a Titlist stand bag this year with my wellness funds but otherwise I would buy another HRM.
  • polo571
    polo571 Posts: 708 Member
    Options
    I use a body bugg and the machines were off 25%. If the machine said I burned 1,000 it was really 750. Everyone should have a monitor
  • BigBoneSista
    BigBoneSista Posts: 2,389 Member
    Options
    Yeah I do love my Polar HRM I must say, it's awesome :bigsmile:

    I find that the machines are inaccurate the other way though, they say I've burned less. I am finding that I am having to work so much harder to push my heart rate up - I must be getting fitter!

    Thats my situation also. The machine always says less than my polar.
  • Spitfirex007
    Spitfirex007 Posts: 749 Member
    Options
    I keep saying I am going to go get one. But never do. I am not sure I see the point in them. Telling what you burn is nice! But I don't see how it adds to your workout. For the price for one HRM I could go buy some new weights or something. And spending around $100 just to count calories seems a bit much. Maybe someday though.
  • darwintheboxer
    darwintheboxer Posts: 51
    Options
    Eh. I'm sure they are fantastic tools but, for myself, I don't find it necessary at this point. I'm sure my elliptical machine overestimates the calorie burn but I rarely eat all my exercise calories back and I am still losing at about my predicted rate. Part of that can be attributed to loss of lean body mass (3500 calories applies to a pound of fat). No matter how hard one tries, not all wieght loss on a diet will be from fat. Part of it is that my maintenance calories are also just an estimate. And part of it is that the calories I log are also just an estimate (although hopefully the most accurate of the three and I did purchase a food scale for this purpose.) Anyway, it might be something I revisit if I hit a prolonged plateau, but for now I'm doing just fine without one.

Categories