Truvia and Purevia - Leave it on the Grocery Store Shelf

Grokette
Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
edited September 2024 in Food and Nutrition
The truth is these "products" are NOT real stevia. Please read below:

24 April 2010
Truvia And PureVia Are Not Stevia
By: Bryan Marcel
.

The latest sweeteners to hit the market are Coca Cola and Cargill’s Truvia and Pepsi’s PureVia. They are both marketed as natural Stevia sweeteners. Truvia and PureVia are not Stevia. I must say that I am concerned about Truvia for several reasons. On August 17, 2007 the FDA sent a warning letter [1] to Hain Celestial Group stating that the use of Stevia in its tea products was unsafe. The FDA stated that they had concerns about Stevia’s “control of blood sugar, and effects on the reproductive, cardiovascular and renal systems”. Then in August 2009 the “FDA has concluded that there is no basis to object to the use of certain refined Stevia preparations in food” . What this means is that Stevia, which is the complete compound consisting of steviosides, rebaudiosides and glycoside is unsafe, even though it has been in use for over 1000 years. But, Coca Cola’s and Cargill’s highly refined and processed Rebaudioside A (Reb A or rebiana), which is a single component of Stevia, is perfectly safe. Really? What gives? So Reb Ain Truvia and PureVia is now okay according to the FDA, but true Stevia is still not approved except as a “herbal supplement”. I disagree, but I’ll move on.

We have to look at the history of the companies involved. Truvia is marketed as “Nature’s calorie-free sweetener”. They claim it’s all natural and made using natural processes. The Coca Cola Company has poisoned us for years with high fructose corn syrup, Splenda (sucralose) and the excitotoxin aspartame. Cargill, Coke’s partner in this venture, has paid millions of dollars to settle lawsuits for polluting our water and our air [2,3,4,5]. So if I understand this correctly, these two “model” companies woke up one day and decided that together they would change their ways and make a natural healthy sweetener, Truvia. Okay. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. Let’s look at what Truvia claims to be and what it really is.

Truvia has three ingredients. Erythritol, rebiana, and natural flavors. First, erythritol. According to Truvia, “Erythritol is a natural sweetener, produced by a natural process, and it is also found in fruits like grapes and pears”. Erythritol is found in fruits like grapes and pears and a few other fruits as well. The amount of erythritol found in watermelon, melon, pears and grapes ranges between 0.0022 – 0.0047% by weight [6]. In order to “harvest” 1 ounce of erythritol you would need between 13 and 28 pounds of these fruits. Since there is no plant that grows and produces erthyritol in any sizable quantity it is made by a manufacturing process. Erythritol is made from a food grade starch (from genetically modified corn) that is broken down into glucose by fermentation with moniliella pollinis, a yeast. The glucose is then broken down into erythritol. It is about 70% the sweetness of sucrose, but its purpose in Truvia is that of a filler, a bulking agent. (Fructose also occurs in fruits. Read my article, “Fructose Makes You Fat And UnHealthy” to see how your body treats a sugar that has been removed from its source).

Second, according to Truvia, “Rebiana comes from the sweet leaf of the Stevia plant, native to South America. Dried Stevia leaves are steeped in water, similar to making tea. This unlocks the best tasting part of the leaf which is then purified to provide a calorie-free sweet taste”. Rebiana or Reb A does come from the Stevia plant. But, according to FoodProductDesign.com, “While Reb A is derived from the Stevia plant, it is not the same as the Stevia that has been sold in the U.S. as a dietary supplement”. Reb A is simply part of the stevioside molecule. It isn’t Stevia. Splenda claims to be made from sugar. It did start out as a sugar molecule, and then in a five step process three chlorine molecules were added. The end result not being anything remotely close to sugar. Truvia is using the same logic-stretching technique. Rebiana isn’t the Stevia that you have heard about for years. It is also true that the Stevia plant is native to South America. What they don’t tell you is that 80% of all Stevia comes from China. I don’t trust China to safely produce any food product. They have proven time and time again over the past several years that they cannot be trusted to make safe, quality products. There are also many genetically modified forms of Stevia being grown. Genetic modification alters the plant at the cellular level. It’s not known what, if any, long-term health implications genetic modification will have. Europe has banned many genetically modified foods. Those that they do allow require labels informing the consumer. I have written Truvia asking if their Stevia is grown in China and if they use genetically modified plants. If I ever get a response, I will post it.
In the meantime it is safe to assume that their Stevia is grown in China and is genetically modified.

Truvia claims that the process used to make rebiana is “similar to making tea”. Please define “similar”. According to Coca Cola’s U.S. patent application [7] method for purifying Truvia’s rebiana is a 42 step process that includes the use of acetone, acetonitrile, metanol, ethanol (yes, the same that you put in your gas tank) and isopropanol (rubbing alcohol). The side effects of exposure to these substances ranges from suppression of the central nervous system to death. Now I don’t know about you, but I personally don’t use any of these substances when I make tea. It is curious though, that Coca Cola filed this patent for rebiana on May 21, 2007 and three months later (August 17, 2007) the real Stevia was ruled unsafe, but rebiana was approved. The “purification process” results in rebiana being 95% pure. Because of this it is about 400 times sweeter than sugar. Truvia claims that each packet of Truvia is twice as sweet as sugar. Let’s do the math. Rebiana is 400 times sweeter than sugar. Truvia as a final product is twice as sweet as sugar. So 400 divided by 2 is 200. One packet of pure rebiana would then be the equivalent of 200 packets of sugar. Try this at home. Empty one sugar packet onto a plate. Divide the sugar on the plate into 200 equal portions. One portion of the 200 is the miniscule amount of rebiana in a single packet of Truvia. So what is in the rest of the Truvia packet? All ingredients are required to be listed in order of predominance. So the first ingredient in any food product is what that product has the most of. Then the ingredients are listed in descending order. With Truvia, the first ingredient is erythritol. Erythritol is mainly what Truvia is made of, followed by a very distant miniscule amount of rebiana, and in turn by even less natural flavor.

And that brings us to the last ingredient, natural flavor. Truvia’s website says that “natural flavors are used to bring out the best of Truvia, like pepper or salt or any other spice that would be used to heighten the taste of food”. The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines natural flavor as: “any product which contains the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit or fruit juice, vegetable or vegetable juice … whose significant function in food is for flavoring rather than nutritional”. Sounds very natural, but look closer. “Flavoring constituents derived” says what a natural flavor really is: The chemical equivalent of a natural flavor. Natural flavors are made in a laboratory. What the natural flavor is doesn’t have to be listed because they are considered to be trade secrets. The only time that you will ever see “natural flavor” listed on a food ingredient label is when there are no real natural flavors. But it is resourceful for Truvia’s to compare their natural flavor to pepper or salt. As a side note, an artificial flavor is the chemical equivalent of a flavor that is not from a spice, fruit, vegetable, etc, but also made in a lab.

Truvia uses the word “natural” a lot on their website and packaging. Most people don’t realize that with the exception of meat that the word “natural” has no meaning. I have shown you how Truvia is made. Truvia doesn’t seem at all “natural” to me. You won’t find Truvia in nature. Even with genetic modification you can’t grow it. The Truvia website and packaging has been very carefully worded. They bend the truth and make inferences, but they never quite lie. People read their information and see what they want to see. Hence the use of pictures of Stevia leaves and all the “green” on the box and website.

Although the majority of this article is about Coca Cola’s Truvia, don’t count out their competitor PepsiCo. PepsiCo has entered into a partnership with Whole Earth Sweetener Company to jointly own and market PureVia, their version of essentially the same product. The difference is that PureVia uses dextrose, a simple sugar instead of erythritol as the primary sweetener. Whole Earth Sweetener Company is owned by the Merisant Company, the makers of Equal. Equal contains apartmane, a multipotential carcinogenic. So don’t let all of the feel-good natural claims on their websites fool you. Truvia and PureVia are just another scam on the consumer. These products are marketed as Stevia sweeteners and they are anything but that. If you want Stevia, then look for Stevia extract or stevioside on the ingredient label. I think that real Stevia is fine in moderation. Erythritol is fine in its natural form in fruit. But when you take a component of a fruit, like erythritol, that makes up less than 0.0047% of that fruit and you make it the primary ingredient in your new sweetener, no one knows how the human body will react to it long term. (But our experience with fructose and high fructose corn syrup may be some indication.) This is not the Stevia with its 1000+ year history. Truvia and PureVia are new chemical concoctions that have no history and no track record. Besides that, these sweeteners totally miss the point. The goal is better health through a healthy diet. The best way to achieve that in regards to sweeteners is to keep it simple and reduce consumption.

Truvia and PureVia are just products designed to keep you consuming things that aren’t any good for you under the premise of reduced calories. Use raw honey, raw sugar, and real Stevia sparingly. Leave the Truvia and PureVia on the store shelf next to all the other man made artificial sweeteners where they belong.

http://www.bryanmarcel.com/truvia-and-purevia-are-not-stevia
«1

Replies

  • Jena_72
    Jena_72 Posts: 1,057
    wow thank you my friend although this makes me VERY sad! :sad:
  • lisablueeyes
    lisablueeyes Posts: 213 Member
    WOW!! Thanks for the info...
  • blessedtobefit
    blessedtobefit Posts: 157 Member
    Thanks! I am going to share this...
  • Pandorian
    Pandorian Posts: 2,055 Member
  • Tuckersn
    Tuckersn Posts: 149
    Does this really surprise people anymore? Thats my only thought. Thank you for posting!!
  • NoAdditives
    NoAdditives Posts: 4,251 Member
    Stevia actually is safe. Or at least has not been actually proven to be unsafe. There was one study done several years ago that found it to cause reproductive harm and other affects when consumed at high levels. However, newer studies have been done that disprove the earlier study.

    Japan has been using Stevia for over 30 years and they have not had any health problems because of it. Of course, they don't consume it the levels that this country does, so who is to say that at the levels we consume artificial sweeteners it wouldn't have some negative health effects. Either way, I'm sure you're better off avoiding artificial sweeteners, refined sugar and other sweeteners all together. It's really not that hard to cut out sugar.
  • Grokette
    Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
    Stevia actually is safe. Or at least has not been actually proven to be unsafe. There was one study done several years ago that found it to cause reproductive harm and other affects when consumed at high levels. However, newer studies have been done that disprove the earlier study.

    Japan has been using Stevia for over 30 years and they have not had any health problems because of it. Of course, they don't consume it the levels that this country does, so who is to say that at the levels we consume artificial sweeteners it wouldn't have some negative health effects. Either way, I'm sure you're better off avoiding artificial sweeteners, refined sugar and other sweeteners all together. It's really not that hard to cut out sugar.

    Yes, that article says that Stevia (natural) is fine. The Truvia and Purevia are the artificial sweeteners!!!
  • amycal
    amycal Posts: 646 Member
    I use a small amount of STevia. A local naturopath who I really trust says it is safe in moderate amounts. Thanks for sharing - even though I couldn't really keep up with most of the article I will stick with true Stevia and not any warped form of it.
  • Sheila_KI
    Sheila_KI Posts: 206 Member
    I gave up diet sodas and "diet" sugars. If I really need to add sugar to my tea...it is very minimal. After years of hearing, I finally believe that any sugar - "diet" or real does cause you to have cravings. Try it for awhile. It is amazing what you don't need after a bit. :drinker:
  • JimHeid
    JimHeid Posts: 42 Member
    bump
  • Grokette
    Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
    bump
  • milaxx
    milaxx Posts: 1,122 Member
    yep, I bought truvia because it was cheaper, but started having the same reactions as with aspertame. I back to stevia and just suck the price.
  • dmanakho
    dmanakho Posts: 143 Member
    So.... who's Bryan Marcel?
  • stargzrlily
    stargzrlily Posts: 83 Member
    I tried Truvia and it was gross. I'm skeptical to try anything similar. I really like my ice tea in the summer =/
  • tmarie2715
    tmarie2715 Posts: 1,111 Member
    Thank you. :)
  • calibri
    calibri Posts: 439 Member
    So.... who's Bryan Marcel?
    No idea. His reference links on the bottom do display Coca-Cola's patent of extracting Reb A, which does include the ingredients he has listed in his paragraph. He is also correct in asserting that Truvia does not list Stevia as an ingredient, and instead uses Reb A (a compound found IN Stevia, but is not stevia itself). However, it does not appear how Truvia presents it "as stevia" when it merely states it is derived from the stevia plant, which is technically true. And, as stated in Mr Marcel's article, 'natural' does not mean anything in the eyes of the FDA who regulate the usage of such labelling.
  • brandiuntz
    brandiuntz Posts: 2,717 Member
    So.... who's Bryan Marcel?

    A personal trainer.

    So, Truvia, etc, might be as "bad" for you as other artificial sweeteners. Just more of the ongoing debate of artificial sweeteners versus sugar.

    I'll still be buying Truvia for now.
  • Silverkittycat
    Silverkittycat Posts: 1,997 Member
    I've seen small plants at both Lowe's and Home Depot - if any of you would like to grow, dry and powder the leaves yourself. :smile:
  • Grokette
    Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
    Resurecting the thread from the dead for informational purposes.
  • lockef
    lockef Posts: 466
    Thanks for bumping this! Good read!
  • AlyRoseNYC
    AlyRoseNYC Posts: 1,075 Member
    Anyone wanna guess what I just bought at the supermarket last week? Dammit lol
  • GalaxyDuck
    GalaxyDuck Posts: 406 Member
    Bump. Thanks for providing this great information. I haven't tried Truvia or PureVia, but I was thinking about it. Glad to know I should just avoid it altogether!
  • Grokette
    Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
    Resurecting the thread from the dead for informational purposes. I know a lot of people who have started using these products.

    If you are concerned with your health and well being, find real stevia.
  • Raclex
    Raclex Posts: 238
    Thanks for sharing this info.. I also transitionned to Stevia and just couldn't get used to the taste. I'm not a big sugar eater anymore, so I went back to my traditionnal cane sugar and ocasionnally, real maple syrup! The little calories that 1 tea spoon offers is well worth it!
  • Grokette
    Grokette Posts: 3,330 Member
    Thanks for sharing this info.. I also transitionned to Stevia and just couldn't get used to the taste. I'm not a big sugar eater anymore, so I went back to my traditionnal cane sugar and ocasionnally, real maple syrup! The little calories that 1 tea spoon offers is well worth it!

    Awesome!!!

    I do use some Sweet Leaf liquid stevia and sometimes float a piece of a leaf in my iced tea.

    My husband uses raw sugar on occasion and some organic maple syrup and local, raw honey on occasion.
  • rml_16
    rml_16 Posts: 16,414 Member
    I leave it on the shelf because it all tastes like cray to me, anyway. I use real sugar or honey in moderation.
  • UponThisRock
    UponThisRock Posts: 4,519 Member
    ohnoes.gif
  • I gave up diet sodas and "diet" sugars. If I really need to add sugar to my tea...it is very minimal. After years of hearing, I finally believe that any sugar - "diet" or real does cause you to have cravings. Try it for awhile. It is amazing what you don't need after a bit. :drinker:


    ^^ ditto!! I also saw a segment with Alton Brown on the food network where he explains how horrible any sweatner is.. so, now I use just a tiny bit of the natural sugar (or honey, or rock sugar, etc) instead of equal (like i used to).
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Thanks for sharing this info.. I also transitionned to Stevia and just couldn't get used to the taste. I'm not a big sugar eater anymore, so I went back to my traditionnal cane sugar and ocasionnally, real maple syrup! The little calories that 1 tea spoon offers is well worth it!

    I agree with this. I've never tried Stevia, Truvia or the other sweetener mentioned but I decided long ago that there is just too much conflicting information on artificial sweeteners to make them worth the risk even if they didn't taste like crap (which, IMO, they do). I don't drink sweetened beverages and don't eat a lot of sweets but when I do, I go for natural sugars.
  • ohnoes.gif

    hahaaaa....i totally agree
This discussion has been closed.