Heart Rate Monitor

Options
MalyMal
MalyMal Posts: 102 Member
in Fitness and Exercise
Hey, just wondering if anyone knows of good HRM that doesn't require the leads just maybe like a watch type one. If so where could I find one, I would really like to know how many calories I am burning in each work out :)

Thanks so much,
Malymal

Replies

  • HartJames
    HartJames Posts: 789 Member
    Options
    I have been reccomending mine to everyone, top rated by consumer reports, good housekeeping and a lot of fitness journals. Luck you it's on sale for only $38!

    http://www.amazon.com/Timex-T5G971-Unisex-Personal-Monitor/dp/B000P8VWQS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1298410114&sr=8-1

    not sure what you mean by "leads" but if you mean the chest strap, it's required to be accurate in any heart rate monitor that actually works.
  • qtrhrsewoman
    qtrhrsewoman Posts: 50
    Options
    I have the one from wal-mart that is less than $30 bucks. It works for my needs. It is a watch type that monitors heart rate, calories burned, and also have stopwatch and countdown functions, in addition to regular watch functions. The only draw back on it is that you have to stop and press the button to check your heart rate, but it hasn't been an issue for me. Another slightly aggravating thing is that depending on what you are doing with your hands, you can hit the button to stop the calorie counter. I wear it when i am cleaning stalls in the barn, and I have to keep a check on it to make sure it is still on.

    Like I said, this one meets all my needs, and didn't cost an arm and a leg.
  • shymac
    shymac Posts: 7
    Options
    I purchased the New Balance HRT Fit at Target for $50 and I really like it.
  • spaboleo
    spaboleo Posts: 172
    Options
    I wouldn't recommend that.

    The reason is that a heart rate monitor with the breast-strap measures your heart frequency and not your pulse rate (counted by the blood flushes per minute e.g. at your main artery at your ankle.
    If your heart rates gets quite high two muscle contractions of your heart (the heartbeat) could get so close together that the pulse of the blood flush can't be countably told apart.

    There are a few of those devices on the market. (e.g. from the brand "Beurer")
    Most of them look like a glove with a ring around your index finger. That ring rays light through your fingertip and counts the blood flushes going through it.
    But I experienced those as even more uncomfortable to wear and even not really accurate.
  • togden
    togden Posts: 324 Member
    Options
    I use the polar FT4 ... it has a chest strap and watch but everything is wireless so no leads or wires
  • cmowat13
    cmowat13 Posts: 98 Member
    Options
    I have been reccomending mine to everyone, top rated by consumer reports, good housekeeping and a lot of fitness journals. Luck you it's on sale for only $38!

    http://www.amazon.com/Timex-T5G971-Unisex-Personal-Monitor/dp/B000P8VWQS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1298410114&sr=8-1

    not sure what you mean by "leads" but if you mean the chest strap, it's required to be accurate in any heart rate monitor that actually works.

    I am thinking about buying this because I've been searching for a good one for a little while now. While reading the reviews, though, I've seen a few people say that it really overestimates on the calories burned. Have you noticed this? A lot of people also said that they were having to put gel on it and even that wasn't working. You seem to really like yours though (along with numerous people that wrote reviews on Amazon) so I don't know what to do...
  • cmowat13
    cmowat13 Posts: 98 Member
    Options
    bump
  • HartJames
    HartJames Posts: 789 Member
    Options
    I think the people who have a problem with it over estimating have not set it up correctly (their weight, base and max HR) and those that are haveing a problem otherwise are not realizing how important it is to keep the chest strap on correctly (ie: slightly wetting it to create initial connection and having the strap snug enough). If the few (out of thousands of reviews) are useing gel and that is STILL not working (weird) I would say they have a defective chest strap or interference somehow. I also wonder if they are basing their opinion off of comparing the readout to gym machines which are notoriously inaccurate. I trust it, my trainer trusts it and I trust the professional (not just comsumer) reviews I have read. I stand behind it :) The HR also matchs my count. You can buy ANY HRM and it will turn on, tell you numbers and look as though it's working but how do you KNOW? That is why I researched it, and compiled professional, unbiased and consumer opinions. There is ONE that is better and it cost $200 more (Polar).
  • HartJames
    HartJames Posts: 789 Member
    Options
    I also want to add, I think people usually forget to subtract the calories they would nomally burn without exercising from their readout to get the true number of cals burned from exercise.
  • loriefolk
    loriefolk Posts: 352
    Options
    I have the one from wal-mart that is less than $30 bucks. It works for my needs. It is a watch type that monitors heart rate, calories burned, and also have stopwatch and countdown functions, in addition to regular watch functions. The only draw back on it is that you have to stop and press the button to check your heart rate, but it hasn't been an issue for me. Another slightly aggravating thing is that depending on what you are doing with your hands, you can hit the button to stop the calorie counter. I wear it when i am cleaning stalls in the barn, and I have to keep a check on it to make sure it is still on.

    Like I said, this one meets all my needs, and didn't cost an arm and a leg.

    I have the same one and love it. I even checked my heart rate on the elliptical trainer with my HRM and it was exactly the same!
    I wouldn't recommend anything else :)
  • cmowat13
    cmowat13 Posts: 98 Member
    Options
    I think the people who have a problem with it over estimating have not set it up correctly (their weight, base and max HR) and those that are haveing a problem otherwise are not realizing how important it is to keep the chest strap on correctly (ie: slightly wetting it to create initial connection and having the strap snug enough). If the few (out of thousands of reviews) are useing gel and that is STILL not working (weird) I would say they have a defective chest strap or interference somehow. I also wonder if they are basing their opinion off of comparing the readout to gym machines which are notoriously inaccurate. I trust it, my trainer trusts it and I trust the professional (not just comsumer) reviews I have read. I stand behind it :) The HR also matchs my count. You can buy ANY HRM and it will turn on, tell you numbers and look as though it's working but how do you KNOW? That is why I researched it, and compiled professional, unbiased and consumer opinions. There is ONE that is better and it cost $200 more (Polar).

    Thanks! Yeah, the one you have and the Polar seem to be two of the top and that seems like a great price for that one. I think I'll be trying it.

Categories