Am I doing something wrong??

Kelblue1
Kelblue1 Posts: 139 Member
edited September 26 in Health and Weight Loss
I show on MFP I should have 1200 calories a day which I stay very close too. I lost 3 lbs the first week, then I added in Zumba and walking about 4-5 times a week. I always put my workouts in. I have a Polar HRM so I put in what it shows for calories burned. Then I eat the calories it shows. (my 1200 plus what I've burned) But the last 2 weeks I seem to have not budged really. Am I doing something wrong?? I don't get it.
«1

Replies

  • chanstriste13
    chanstriste13 Posts: 3,277 Member
    give it time. your body probably just needs to adjust to the activity. it'll happen! :flowerforyou:
  • eeeekie
    eeeekie Posts: 1,011 Member
    are you tracking your sodium?
    drinking enough water?
    is it your TOM? (week before?)
    are you measuring all your food properly?

    There a lots of factors
  • tdjones00
    tdjones00 Posts: 68
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.
  • NoAdditives
    NoAdditives Posts: 4,251 Member
    If you open up your diary we can make suggestions based on your habits.
  • Dont get discouraged. it sounds like you have come to a halt.. your body may be used the activity that you have been giving it.. Switch it up every week.. from brisk walking one day. to a run the next. lifting weights , zumba , yoga. It challenges your muscles more. and re boots everything again.. lots of change.. changing your distants and speed ect.. also weight training is key.. the more muscle mass you have the more calories you burn..
  • I'm in no way an expert, but my understanding is that you need a calorie deficit in order to lose weight. So, that means you shouldn't be eating the calories you burned doing zumba and walking. You should stick to the 1200 calories, and add your exercise without eating more.

    I really struggle with this myself, but the earlier post asking about water is the key for me. If I'm drinking enough water, I don't feel hungry on the 1200 calories, even after an early morning workout. But if I haven't had enough water, I feel like I'm hungry. I hope that helps!

    P.S. I'm 5'5" and 149 lbs. I have mine set at 1250 calories to lose 1.1 lbs per week. I've only been on here a week so no real results yet, but at last weigh in I'd lost 0.8 lbs.
  • thetrishwarp
    thetrishwarp Posts: 838 Member
    As has been said multiple times by multiple people, MFP builds in a calorie deficit - you do not need to create one yourself. Eating your exercise calories is great. What you may want to try doing is eating 1200 one day, 1500 the next, back to 1200, for a week or two to keep your body guessing.
  • chanstriste13
    chanstriste13 Posts: 3,277 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.

    this is debatable. be careful with this option. it's different for everyone, of course, but many people find that they do lose weight quickly for a time, but then their metabolism pretty much dies and they are unable to lose anymore. tricky tricky...
  • ladyhawk00
    ladyhawk00 Posts: 2,457 Member
    I'm in no way an expert, but my understanding is that you need a calorie deficit in order to lose weight. So, that means you shouldn't be eating the calories you burned doing zumba and walking. You should stick to the 1200 calories, and add your exercise without eating more.

    This is actually incorrect. MFP does not work like other counters/plans. MFP creates a built in deficit, based on your chosen loss per week goal, regardless of exercise. It adds cals to maintain that deficit, keeping it steady - and therefore your weight loss steady. Eating under goal will not necessarily make you lose faster, and can result in slower metabolism and burning a higher ratio of muscle, rather than fat.

    Here's a couple of threads that discuss this:

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/186814-some-mfp-basics

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/61706-guide-to-calorie-deficits

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/10589-for-those-confused-or-questioning-eating-your-exercise-calo

    http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/117726-eating-exercise-cals-slowing-your-weight-loss-read-this
  • a_freeman
    a_freeman Posts: 116 Member
    I agree with chanstriste. I think you may not be eating enough and your body is in starvation mode. Reset your MFP calories and eat your exercise calories. On the positive side, you'll be less hungry and might lose weight. The worst that could happen is you stay where you are. I also watch my carbs which I think helps me with craving
  • taso42_DELETED
    taso42_DELETED Posts: 3,394 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.

    Fail!
  • mkennedym
    mkennedym Posts: 253 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.

    this is fine if she is doing extremely light workouts, but this is awful advice if her workouts are particularly strenuous and she is burning a lot of calories.
  • TheNewLK
    TheNewLK Posts: 933 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.

    Fail!

    Precisely!!! You have to eat them!!! Else it will slow down your weight loss....((spoken from experience))
  • mkennedym
    mkennedym Posts: 253 Member
    I agree with chanstriste. I think you may not be eating enough and your body is in starvation mode. Reset your MFP calories and eat your exercise calories. On the positive side, you'll be less hungry and might lose weight. The worst that could happen is you stay where you are. I also watch my carbs which I think helps me with craving

    no.

    http://www.weightwatchers.com/util/art/index_art.aspx?tabnum=1&art_id=35501
  • FK1983
    FK1983 Posts: 186 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.
    ^This, I never have and never will eat exercise calories. 107lbs lost in 6 months shows what works lol :laugh:
  • Kelblue1
    Kelblue1 Posts: 139 Member
    I have been eating my calories burned due to MFP already figuring in the deficiency. In many days I do Zumba and then may walk with my little one later and can burn a total of 800 calories. So if I didn't eat my calories I'd lose fast I'm sure but probably be extremely sick also. I did start my TOM 2 days ago so maybe that is my issue for this weigh in today. I hadn't even though of that affecting me. Thanks for all the feed back! I'll start rotating workouts too and see how that does!
  • mkennedym
    mkennedym Posts: 253 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.
    ^This

    no. that is unhealthy advice especially for women.
  • FK1983
    FK1983 Posts: 186 Member
    no. that is unhealthy advice especially for women.
    It's totally healthy and safe actually (1200-1600 calories per day), recommended, tried and tested, Doctors even recommend it, the problem is it isn't the "MFP Way" so must be wrong! lol
  • Cordy_in_CT
    Cordy_in_CT Posts: 134 Member
    I show on MFP I should have 1200 calories a day which I stay very close too. I lost 3 lbs the first week, then I added in Zumba and walking about 4-5 times a week. I always put my workouts in. I have a Polar HRM so I put in what it shows for calories burned. Then I eat the calories it shows. (my 1200 plus what I've burned) But the last 2 weeks I seem to have not budged really. Am I doing something wrong?? I don't get it.
    I'm in a "holding pattern" too. And I'm a little sad and frustrated, and wondered if I was doing something wrong too. I've been working so hard at the gym doing lots of cardio. I've been making healthy eating choices, logging, and staying within my calories. It's hard when I see other people losing so much so quickly. Let's hang in there. What's the alternative? :grumble:
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.

    100% disagree with this comment. The only way to ensure you meet your weekly caloric deficit goal (weekly weight loss goal) is to eat your exercise calories.
  • SMarie10
    SMarie10 Posts: 956 Member
    no. that is unhealthy advice especially for women.
    It's totally healthy and safe actually (1200-1600 calories per day), recommended, tried and tested, Doctors even recommend it, the problem is it isn't the "MFP Way" so must be wrong! lol
    Sorry FK - It may have worked in your circumstance, but IMHO, this is poor advice. The MFP site and recommendations for eating back exercise calories is tried and true and more important, it is sustainable in the long run for Most people (you may be the exception, which is great for you, but not so great for everyone else).
  • mkennedym
    mkennedym Posts: 253 Member
    no. that is unhealthy advice especially for women.
    It's totally healthy and safe actually (1200-1600 calories per day), recommended, tried and tested, Doctors even recommend it, the problem is it isn't the "MFP Way" so must be wrong! lol

    1200 to 1600 NET calories, not 1200 calories before exercise calories are added.
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    Don't eat what you burn. Stick to the 1200 calories and it will melt off.
    ^This, I never have and never will eat exercise calories. 107lbs lost in 6 months shows what works lol :laugh:

    Sorry, I don't agree at all. and 107 is 6 months is not considered healthy weight loss, that is way more than the 2lbs/week that is considered safe and healthy.

    Most doctors or nutritionist knowing you workout will not give you so few calories. Most likely if you workout 4 days per week a nutritionist will give you 1600 ish calories/day to lose weight. MFP will give you 1200 and tell you to eat your calories back. If on those 4 days you burn 600/day MFP will give you 10,800 cals for the week (1200*3 + 1800*4) and your nutritionist will give you 11200 (1600*7) which is pretty close after taking into account exercise 10,800 vs 11,200. Which is why MFP tells you to eat your exercise calories.

    On days you workout if you only ate 1200 and burned the 600 you would net 600, which would be like eating 600 calories and not working out. this is not enough calories at all.
  • FK1983
    FK1983 Posts: 186 Member
    107 is 6 months is not considered healthy weight loss, that is way more than the 2lbs/week that is considered safe and healthy.
    My Doctor and Dietitian are very happy with my results as are 99% of everyone else I have ever spoken too, thanks for your concern though lol :happy:
  • bizco
    bizco Posts: 1,949 Member
    Are you using a food scale to weigh everything you eat? Most people drastically underestimate how much food they're eating. Even using measuring cups and food labels can be misleading. For example, I eat Quaker old-fashioned oatmeal for breakfast. The nutrition panel says "1/2 cup (40 grams) per serving." However, when I use a food scale to weigh a leveled (not heaping) 1/2 cup measuring cup, it actually weighs 54 grams. There are many other instances where I find even greater differences using measuring cups instead of actually weighing the food. Just a thought.
  • muth3rluvx2
    muth3rluvx2 Posts: 1,156 Member
    Are you using a food scale to weigh everything you eat? Most people drastically underestimate how much food they're eating. Even using measuring cups and food labels can be misleading. For example, I eat Quaker old-fashioned oatmeal for breakfast. The nutrition panel says "1/2 cup (40 grams) per serving." However, when I use a food scale to weigh a leveled (not heaping) 1/2 cup measuring cup, it actually weighs 54 grams. There are many other instances where I find even greater differences using measuring cups instead of actually weighing the food. Just a thought.

    Raw or cooked? Many confuse the two. Often, the measuring is cooked and the weight is raw, hence the drastic differences. You'll note it most on pastas. Although, eating the raw amt once cooked is alot less so you're consuming alot less cals..so not necessarily a bad mistake - but it can be a frustrating one.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    If you just added the exercise, it's possible your body is in the process of building muscle which wieghs more than fat. Likely you will begin to lose again soon as your muscle building evens out but your fat loss continues.
  • BBBgettingfit
    BBBgettingfit Posts: 58 Member
    I'm experiencing the same thing! Argh. I've been really good about logging my food and exercising a few days per week and eating the exercise calories, but all I've managed to do is gain half a pound of the few initial pounds I lost in the first two weeks back. I am telling myself that since it's only been a short time, I'll up the ol' water intake and hang in there. I don't know if I've worked out enough to gain muscle, but I'm hoping that muscle gain is canceling out the fat loss and causing this situation.
  • Cytherea
    Cytherea Posts: 515 Member
    I have a Polar HRM so I put in what it shows for calories burned. Then I eat the calories it shows. (my 1200 plus what I've burned) But the last 2 weeks I seem to have not budged really. Am I doing something wrong?? I don't get it.

    Are you eating the entire amount that your HRM tells you your burned? Because if you are, you're doing it wrong, lol. You definitely *should* be eating back your exercise calories- but first, you have to do some math. You can't just input the number that the HRM gives you. What you need to do is subtract the number of calories that you would have burned anyways, at rest, and then only eat back what is leftover. Wear your HRM someday while you are lounging on the couch and doing nothing for 10 minutes. It will vary, so you can do it a few times over the course of different days and average the results, if you want. When you see how many calories you burn in 10 minutes doing nothing, then you'll need to do some math when it comes to calculating how many of your exercise calories you can eat back. Let's say you worked out for an hour. 60 / 10 (because we're calculating in 10 minutes intervals) = 6. Then multiply that number by however many calories you normally burn at rest (for me, it is about 18). So 6 * 18 = 108. Now, take the total amount of calories your HRM told you that you burned during your workout and subtract your resting calories from that. Let's say it was 300 calories. 300 - 108 = 192. So ONLY eat back that 192. If you eat back the full 300, you will be overeating which could definitely account for your slowed weight loss.

    You should also remember that if you've just added the workouts, your body is (hopefully!) building muscle. So it may be the case that you are still losing fat, but gaining muscle, and that is why you haven't seen a loss. Now, this doesn't happen overnight, it takes time, but it is a possibility that may be happening. Which is why it would be good to take your measurements and record those too, not just your weight, so you get a better/more accurate picture.

    I also agree with the posters who asked about how you are measuring your food. Get a cheap food scale, if you don't have one already... it just takes the guesswork out. This way, you'll definitely know that what you logged is completely accurate. You may be going over without realizing it.
  • Believeth64
    Believeth64 Posts: 469 Member
    Well this is what i've experienced when i was exercising and i was an advocate for exercise faithfully worked out when i would stick to my daily calories i had a hard time losing so i started eating some of the extra calories but i try my best to make healthy choices rather than junk foods what i did was say most of the time on my ellipticle i burned 1,200 to 1,300 calories for my 60 mins workout 4 days a week then my stationary bike 30 mins 4 days a week and then i would do strength training 2 to 3 days a week i found that i was putting out a lot of energy and burning calories and wasn't eating enough so my body went into a protection mode some call it starvation mode so i had to keep messing with my calories until i started losing however when you exercise the scale is not always fair but the results of working out means more than just the scale i was losing a lot of inches and i was getting smaller and smaller the clothes size was going down like the titanic so while exercising start calculating measurements also then you will feel better well for me it made me :laugh: so give it some time and keep what you are doing i know we want those numbers on the scale fall each week because i do too at least you can exercise i can't until i heal from ankle surgery and learn how to walk again so if i don't lose weekly even thou i stay right on my daily calories i know i am going to feel :brokenheart: because i found that my body is use to moving not total bed rest everyday right now i am waiting for a bone graft stimulator from my insurance it is used to promote faster healing for some reason maybe due to the fact the surgeon had to break my ankle and reposition my foot which is my third ankle surgery same ankle it is taking a long time for the break to heal but keep doing what you are doing it adds up
This discussion has been closed.