rep range for a bulk ...
Options
ndj1979
Posts: 29,136 Member
something I am curious about. Starting on Monday I am going to be increasing calories by 250 a day, currently at maintenance, with goal of adding about .5 pound a week over next few months. This is my first time doing a "bulk"…was going to do one last winter but chickened out because I was worried would put on "fat"…stupid I know now. ..
so anyway, just curious as to what rep range I should be aiming to hit..6 reps, 7reps, 8reps, etc...
For most of lifts now I am usually doing four sets of each by six reps. Except for squats where I have been working in 8 rep range and deadlifts I am usually in five rep range…
i do upper/lower split four days a week …so monday - upper; tuesday - lower; wens - core/light cardio; thursday - upper; friday - lower…
thanks in advance….
so anyway, just curious as to what rep range I should be aiming to hit..6 reps, 7reps, 8reps, etc...
For most of lifts now I am usually doing four sets of each by six reps. Except for squats where I have been working in 8 rep range and deadlifts I am usually in five rep range…
i do upper/lower split four days a week …so monday - upper; tuesday - lower; wens - core/light cardio; thursday - upper; friday - lower…
thanks in advance….
0
Replies
-
Hey, NDJ I've done 2 bulks over the past two winters. 1st bulk was 15 lbs. doing primarily 8-12 rep range eating 'clean' with good macros. 2nd bulk was 16 lbs. doing 5x5 style workouts eating IIFYM with the same good macros. Similar results both times. You're gonna gain fat, but honestly the cut is the easy part. Your current workouts look solid. Just let the extra calories/energy allow you additional strength gains.0
-
Interesting article I read on it recently.
http://www.exercisebiology.com/index.php/site/articles/are_low_reps_or_high_reps_better_for_muscle_growth_in_trained_lifters/0 -
Rule of thumb is 8-12 for bulk. Your mileage may vary..works for me.
I recently read a study that volumn has more to do with it than number of sets/reps. So you pretty much get the same results if you do 4 x8 or 8 x 4. Main thing seem to be....do SOMETHING.0 -
mustgetmuscles1 wrote: »Interesting article I read on it recently.
http://www.exercisebiology.com/index.php/site/articles/are_low_reps_or_high_reps_better_for_muscle_growth_in_trained_lifters/
thanks for sharing that …interesting read for sure!0 -
Great article as it challenges a lot of the conventional wisdom that lacked proper research. Of course, that would be a lot of things in the weight lifting world, unfortunately.0
-
[/quote]
8-12 is not a rule of thumb.
[/quote]
Funny. I use rule of thumb..state you may find something different & quote a scientific study that says it doesn't matter. And I still get someone questioning it. As I look down at my 19 inch arms and six pack I shake my head in shame, how can I be so wrong....0 -
Plenty of ways to do it. Generally you'll need adequate total training volume and you should be incrementally increasing load over time. I think a good strategy for many people is to keep the main barbell movements slightly lower in rep range to promote strength gains and keep accessory movements slightly higher in volume.
Ultimately though, you can cause hypertrophy in both low and high rep ranges.0 -
TiberiusClaudis wrote: »
[/quote]
Funny. I use rule of thumb..state you may find something different & quote a scientific study that says it doesn't matter. And I still get someone questioning it. As I look down at my 19 inch arms and six pack I shake my head in shame, how can I be so wrong.... [/quote]
In for tips on thumb hypertrophy
0 -
Plenty of ways to do it. Generally you'll need adequate total training volume and you should be incrementally increasing load over time. I think a good strategy for many people is to keep the main barbell movements slightly lower in rep range to promote strength gains and keep accessory movements slightly higher in volume.
Ultimately though, you can cause hypertrophy in both low and high rep ranges.
so maybe just keep existing ranges the same and increase weight on bar over time..?
0 -
Want strength? Low reps with increasing weight over time. Want pure beast bulk? High reps with lower weight. I.E. make it 'burn' and keep going. Damage the muscle then let it heal and then do it again. I don't have studies to back this just experience.0
-
Plenty of ways to do it. Generally you'll need adequate total training volume and you should be incrementally increasing load over time. I think a good strategy for many people is to keep the main barbell movements slightly lower in rep range to promote strength gains and keep accessory movements slightly higher in volume.
Ultimately though, you can cause hypertrophy in both low and high rep ranges.
so maybe just keep existing ranges the same and increase weight on bar over time..?
I think your 6 rep range is nice. I would lower squats to 5-6 and not keep it at 8 but that's just me. You will find that the difference be ween 6 and 8 is definitely a couple of extra pounds that can be added to the bar.
sounds good man …I can always bump squats up five pounds and of 4x6 and see how things progress...0 -
donesawyer wrote: »Want strength? Low reps with increasing weight over time. Want pure beast bulk? High reps with lower weight. I.E. make it 'burn' and keep going. Damage the muscle then let it heal and then do it again. I don't have studies to back this just experience.
Read the study earlier in the thread
0 -
Are you planning on following a particular program NDJ, or handling your own programming?0
-
Plenty of ways to do it. Generally you'll need adequate total training volume and you should be incrementally increasing load over time. I think a good strategy for many people is to keep the main barbell movements slightly lower in rep range to promote strength gains and keep accessory movements slightly higher in volume.
Ultimately though, you can cause hypertrophy in both low and high rep ranges.
0 -
TiberiusClaudis wrote: »Funny. I use rule of thumb..state you may find something different & quote a scientific study that says it doesn't matter. And I still get someone questioning it. As I look down at my 19 inch arms and six pack I shake my head in shame, how can I be so wrong....
Because that's not what "rule of thumb" means. He never said it cannot or did not work, just said it is not a "rule of thumb".0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 952 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions