Daily Goals: To stay under, or to meet them?

mwverzola
mwverzola Posts: 2 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm new at all this. It's obvious to me that I should stay under the daily goal for things like calories. But, I have no clue what the daily goals mean for other things. Am I supposed to stay under the goals for everything? Or, am I supposed to eat in a way that meets the goals for other things, like potassium? If so, it would be nice if the charting and tracking information differentiated that fact. "Do not exceed" for some; and "Daily Target" for others.

Replies

  • nuttynanners
    nuttynanners Posts: 249 Member
    edited November 2014
    MFP is set up so that your goal calorie intake is divided into calories from fat, protein, and carbohydrates. Personally I think of the calorie goal as a guideline and pay more attention to what kind of calories I'm eating. For me, I aim to stay under 100 grams carbohydrates and in turn hit my goal for 100 or so grams of protein and 60 or so grams of primarily healthy fats.
  • nuttynanners
    nuttynanners Posts: 249 Member
    As far as nutrients, yes, you are supposed to hit the goal for an appropriate daily value of vitamins and minerals. I.E., you should try to eat nutritious foods that contain those nutrients. If you consistently cannot hit certain goals, i.e. calcium, it might be good to supplement them if you feel the need.

    I agree though, that the charting is more than just red and green numbers! There are gray areas, so to speak, but MFP doesn't really reflect that.
  • TimothyFish
    TimothyFish Posts: 4,925 Member
    Generally, I ignore the other things because the database doesn't have complete information for them. But id it did, it would depend on what it was. You would be better to stay below on sodium but go above on potassium. The opposite is what most end up with.
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,596 Member
    I look at it like a game of Blackjack in a casino: You want to stay under your calorie goals, but come as close as possible to them while still staying under. Assuming you're logging accurately and that your goals were set up properly, coming close to them each day will allow you to fuel your body to lose weight at a steady, sustainable, healthy rate. If your goal is 1800 and you're eating 1750, great. If it's 1800 and you're eating 1200, not great.

    As for the rest of the goals, some are goals you want to come in over (the "good" stuff) and some are under (the "bad" stuff). Don't get me wrong; all these nutrients are both good in the right amounts and bad in the wrong amounts. But some of them are things that most people don't have enough of in their diets, so you want to strive to get at least the amount in your goal. Others are things that people typically eat too much of, so you want to strive to eat at most those amounts.

    For best results, aim to get at least the target of:
    • Protein
    • Fibre
    • Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats
    • Vitamins A and C (others, too, though these two are most commonly tracked on food labels)
    • Potassium (note that most food labels don't include it, so MFP won't be accurate)
    • Calcium
    • Iron

    And try to come in under the target of:
    • Carbs (though no need to go super low-carb unless you have other health reasons for doing so)
    • Saturated Fat
    • Trans Fat (aim for 0 or as close to as possible)
    • Sodium
    • Cholesterol
    • Sugar

    Don't stress about every single macro every single day -- focus on calories, for starters, and on feeling full. If you come in around the right number on a weekly basis, then variations from day to day don't matter all that much. And unless you have medical reasons or blood test results from a doctor that indicate you should pay particular attention to specific vitamins or minerals, most of the time you can assume that you'll do fine with a healthy diet.
  • nuttynanners
    nuttynanners Posts: 249 Member
    I'd like to add, also, I like to cycle my calories occasionally. A little more one day, a little less the next. It helps to get out of a rut. Roughly speaking, 3500 calories = 1 lb of fat. If your body can burn 3500 calories, you burn off that pound. It doesn't particularly matter what days you do it, just that you accumulate a calorie deficit over time.

    Also, I do tend to agree with Timothy. I don't think MFP is incredibly accurate at tracking vitamins and nutrients, but it is a good guideline for seeing how nutrient-dense your food is.
  • ana3067
    ana3067 Posts: 5,623 Member
    Do what works for you. Meet your protein goal overall, and monitor macros if you want. I pretty much only monitor protein.
  • EMTFreakGirl
    EMTFreakGirl Posts: 597 Member
    I like the Black Jack comment. I tend to think of it like a Calorie Price is Right...closest without going over. I'm ok with going over on some things, like fat and sodium, within reason, of course. But calories and carbs I try to get as close as I can WITHOUT going over. Everyone is different, but it's what works for me!
  • mwverzola
    mwverzola Posts: 2 Member
    Thank you to all of you for your comments! Very helpful... I'm now in my 60's, have always been in good shape (military and athlete lifestyle), but, as I get older, rugby and hockey are no longer options. :) And, my past time of riding my Harley all over the country doesn't lend itself particularly well to remaining "svelte." So, until now I've never had to worry about such things as eating healthy. As I said, I'm on a learning curve and committed to dropping about 15lbs and maintaining that. Your thoughtful comments not only taught me some good stuff, but they've also kind of motivated me!
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,603 Member
    I think they're designed for the average person to hover around the target. For some people, this will mean eating less and for others it means eating more. Everyone has their own issues! :)

    You also have to take your own dietary restrictions (if any) and personal preferences into account. As long as you've run any weird dietary preference past a doctor an he approved it, don't worry too much about what the app says.

    Sodium is one you shouldn't exceed and should stay under. Well under, if you asked cardiologists, who would almost unanimously state that 2300 is too high a limit. I think MFP is a little behind the times with that 2300.
This discussion has been closed.