Should I actually be eating 1200 a day?

healthykiko
healthykiko Posts: 4 Member
edited November 9 in Health and Weight Loss
Hi all,

I'm a 19 y.o. 5'4.5 vegan at about 128 or so trying to get to 115. MFP suggested I eat 1200 calories a day to lose 1 lb a week. While I'm not having much trouble with it, I was wondering if that's what I should actually be eating, more/less, etc.

Thanks! :)

Replies

  • Liftng4Lis
    Liftng4Lis Posts: 15,151 Member
    Nope, with that little to lose, you should have your goal set less aggressively. Additionally, you will be earning calories through exercise.
  • fenshae
    fenshae Posts: 27 Member
    Is there any particular reason you want to get down to 115? You're still well within the normal/healthy range of BMI at your current weight. 115 is still in that range, but it's at the low end. If I were in your shoes, I would exercise and eat to recomp/build muscle and get some tone and definition instead of losing weight, if anything.
  • mallory_2014
    mallory_2014 Posts: 173 Member
    Your weekly goal should be 0.5lbs, not 1lb per week. Also, when you exercise you need to eat those calories too when you log the exercise.
  • Ninkyou
    Ninkyou Posts: 6,666 Member
    Liftng4Lis wrote: »
    Nope, with that little to lose, you should have your goal set less aggressively. Additionally, you will be earning calories through exercise.
    This.
    Scale it back to .5 lbs/week. With only 13 lbs to lose, 1 lb a week is too aggressive. And as Lis said, eat back your exercise calories too, or at least a portion of them.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Aemely
    Aemely Posts: 694 Member
    You can check against Scooby's calculator. It's indicating 1350 at 20% reduction, with no exercise and a sedentary/desk job.

    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/

    Some people may recommend losing at a less aggressive level (.5/week) since you don't have much to lose. At a minimum, as noted by Liftng4Lis, I think you should log your exercise and eat back at least some of those gained calories.
  • Katahna
    Katahna Posts: 326 Member
    edited January 2015
    If you lost any more you might start falling through cracks in the ground :) ^^^ What they said.

    Eat a bit more so you can chuck some muscle tone on you, in my honest opinion! looking and being malnourished is the same as being fat IMO.
  • susanbronson2
    susanbronson2 Posts: 3 Member
    It has been proven that eating under 1200 is not healthy. Jenny Craig will not let u go under that. My girlfriend got gallstones her doctor told her she was restricting her calories too much. So I read up on it. It said the same thing so b careful going too low.
  • manicautumn
    manicautumn Posts: 224 Member
    edited January 2015
    susanbronson2 wrote: »
    It has been proven that eating under 1200 is not healthy. Jenny Craig will not let u go under that. My girlfriend got gallstones her doctor told her she was restricting her calories too much. So I read up on it. It said the same thing so b careful going too low.

    While I agree that going under 1200 is unhealthy in almost all cases, this is sensationalism at best.

    While I have since upped my calories to around 1600, I was eating at 1200 as a 5'0 woman with chronic health issues for several weeks with a physician's guidance. I would not recommend it unless you know what you're doing, but it is not "proven" unhealthy in all cases, see: very short women with certain circumstances.

    OP: I'll chime in on the 0.5/week thing. 1lb/week is aggressive for someone in the mid-healthy range.
  • Krueger92
    Krueger92 Posts: 109 Member
    It would be better to up your calories and do some form of cardio or strength training
  • kittkat100
    kittkat100 Posts: 19
    My fitness pal will not recommend less than 1200. It is not the number needed for 1lb week, just the lowest setting it will offer. It is confusing though that it shows 1200 for the 1 and 2 lb loss settings so I understand the question.

    The reason 1 lbs a week when already at a mid level BMI is considered too aggressive is the required deficit is generally too great to sustain.

    As far as people questioning OP's goals. I have to say it comes across as rude no matter how it was intended. I would never presume to tell someone they needed to gain, lose or tone up. Body image is a very personal thing.
  • healthykiko
    healthykiko Posts: 4 Member
    Thanks everyone! 115 is just a number I've always felt comfortable with. I'm a pretty petite person, and generally feel my best right in that range. I'll scale back to aim for .5lb/week and up to 1350. :) Thanks!
This discussion has been closed.

Categories