MFP or Endemondo?

leelosinglbs
leelosinglbs Posts: 5 Member
edited November 9 in Fitness and Exercise
Hi all,

Just a quicke question. I did a 2 mile run today and had endemondo post to my diary to say that I burned 518 calories.

When I checked, out of curiosity, what MFP would have given me in terms of calories, it was only 413.

Why the discrepancy? Which one is more accurate do you think?

Many thanks.

Replies

  • fitbritchick
    fitbritchick Posts: 4
    It really depends on many factors speed, ascendending, descending, weight, height just to name a few. I go with 100 cals for every mile I run but my friend counts 100 cals for every 10 mins but we run at very different speeds she runs a 11 min mile where I run a 7.5 min mile.
  • leelosinglbs
    leelosinglbs Posts: 5 Member
    Thanks for the reply.

    Think I'll stick with the MFP stats as they should be more accurate? I'm getting approx 200 cals per mile from them but I am 19st 7lbs. :'(

    Thanks again.
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    Runner's World puts the formula for net calories from running at .63 * weight in pounds * distance in miles.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories