"Starvation Mode"
Options
Replies
-
We do not call it starvation mode, we call it losing muscle. If you don't eat the right amount of calories for a significant amount of time your body stops burning fat and begins to feed on muscle mass instead. That is the way it was explained to me anyway. But the 1200 calories is not true, the number depends on the person.0
-
Stacey BINGO! that's basically what I was trying to say but my snooze head is in! Fab explanTion!0
-
StaceyJ2008 wrote: »If you don't eat the right amount of calories for a significant amount of time your body stops burning fat...
That does not happen until the body is very lean.
0 -
1) Calories are calories, and a deficit, no matter how it's done, is guaranteed to result in weight loss.
2) Keep your caloric intake above 1200 per day no matter what, because any less and your body enters "starvation mode" and you won't lose weight.
I understand the basis behind both of these claims, easily. What I don't understand is how both can be unequivocally true. ... Both of these rules work as guidelines, sure. But how can they both be completely true?
I'd ask Karen Carpenter, but ... I can't. There's no such thing as starvation mode. There's just . . . starving.
0 -
christinev297 wrote: »Oh lordy. So which is true. I've never been a believer in starvation mode.
So, if you don't eat enough, your metabolism slows down, right or wrong?
Many, many people report that if they stall, then eat more for a little while and drop back down, they lose better than if they just stayed the course. Experts even recommend that if you hit a major stall (which happens to a lot of people who spend a long time progressively losing, around six months in average, they say), you should eat more for a few months and then restart the losing.
I was sick of logging and the holidays were arriving and I was in a major stall. I took a break. It was to be a week or two of pigging out, but on Day 2, I wanted my healthier stuff back. (I prefer the real berries to the Crunch Berries now. Yay.) I didn't log and I didn't pay any attention to whether or not it was too many calories, enough protein, etc. Ate what ever and as much as I wanted. I finished my six weeks two pounds up. I went back to logging and losing and it's flying off again.
I don't know what to make of it, if anything, but that's my little experience.0 -
I think that people start logging better at their new caloric level. I was sick of logging before I took my Christmas break and have lost three pounds since I came back, brand-new kitchen scale in hand.0
-
Awesome @Kalikel Thank you xx0
-
"Starvation mode" explained:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1077746-starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss
0 -
EvgeniZyntx wrote: »"Starvation mode" explained:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1077746-starvation-mode-adaptive-thermogenesis-and-weight-loss
0 -
Phoebeg1723 wrote: »Look, daily suggested intake for a woman = 2000 for a man =2500
As long as you are eating below these and exercising a bit (recommended 3 times a week) you will lose weight.
Any medical profession will tell you to stay above 1200 cal. After that what does it really matter
I am 5'6" and 158 lbs, if I eat 2000 calls a day I gain weight. Everybody ... Every body ... Is different.
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 394 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 951 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions