Maintaining on a lot of calories ? Anyone?
sk1nnyb1tchm0dee
Posts: 23
I'm not using MFP to lose weight but more or less to keep track of what I'm eating. I'm eating between 2500-3000 calories average. I exercise 3-5 times a week moderately. I'm 5'3 and just a bit overweight. Is this normal ? It's all healthy food. Is there any other females that aren't Athletes and are maintaining on this much ?????? Am I insane for feeling I physically need this much ? Ps I'm 22
0
Replies
-
How much do you weigh ?0
-
To tell how many calories you maintain on you'd have to record your intake for at least a month really to be accurate, probably more (no idea how long you've been doing it). It doesn't matter that it's healthy food or not in terms of maintaining/losing/gaining weight, it's a numbers game for most people.
I'm 24 and I maintain on about 2150-2200 a day if you were to spread out the calories I burn exercising in an average week out over all 7 days, and it'd be higher if I didn't have a job that requires a fair amount of time in meetings or at a computer, so I can see how you might have a maintenance range like you suspect that you do.0 -
155 lbsorchidee1987 wrote: »How much do you weigh ?
0 -
I've put your stats on a calorie calculator website (although the best is just to track during a few weekks / months : if your weight is overall stable, nothing to feel insane about), and yeah your calorie requirements seem correct0
-
I'm the same height and weigh only a little less and my maintenance is more like 2200, but I have a very sedentary job. I work out at least 3 times a week, and do a bit of walking otherwise, but my job is at a computer. How active are you outside of your workouts? How active is your job? Your numbers seem a bit high to me, but if you have a very active job they might still be right.0
-
I maintain on a large amount of calories too and I am only 5ft 2!!0
-
It's definitely possible... The maintenance estimates from any calculator is based on population averages. It's the tip of a bell curve, and you could be closer to the end of the curve where your metabolism is naturally a big higher.
Or, you're just more active.
But the only way to know if it's accurate is to track carefully for a period of time and observe weight fluctuations.0 -
I'm always on my feet at work and school and I workout min 3 times a week for two hoursSnuggleSmacks wrote: »I'm the same height and weigh only a little less and my maintenance is more like 2200, but I have a very sedentary job. I work out at least 3 times a week, and do a bit of walking otherwise, but my job is at a computer. How active are you outside of your workouts? How active is your job? Your numbers seem a bit high to me, but if you have a very active job they might still be right.
0 -
-
if it's working for you then stick with it! I am 26 and 5'9", not overweight (but don't know my weight) and I eat 2200-2600 usually. But more if I am hungry.0
-
If you're maintaining your weight and have done for a while then you are eating at maintenance calories.
I'm 5ft 2" and maintain eating between 2100-2300 calories. (I'm 45yrs old with a desk job but very active outside of work)0 -
sk1nnyb1tchm0dee wrote: »
@Steff274 go on tell them how many calories you can eat and still manage to lose lol...as my MFP friend, she makes me jealous I tell ya0 -
Wow. Many of your numbers seem reasonable. I've been tracking for a year or less and my numbers are semi close so I may need to adjust a bit. Thank you everyone0
-
Well, I initially used MFP lose around 15 pounds. Now I'm trying to maintain my weight. I run 25-35 miles per week & I work a pretty physical job. I walk my dog about 2 miles everyday. (Not part of my runs.) I need to eat about 2500-3000 calories everyday except my "rest" days when I don't run or cross-train. I'm 5'5" & 115lbs. It seems like your calorie intake is pretty high if you're not exercising or active in some other way. If you're not gaining weight though, and you feel good, I say go with it. Everyone is different. If you have a chance to go for a physical or to get your BMR analyzed at a gym or by a dietician, you may get a better idea of what's appropriate for you & your body.0
-
I just reread your original post & saw the "aren't athletes" part & realized my answer probably didn't help much. Haha. Sorry for not reading it thoroughly before posting a reply.0
-
I'm 19, 5'5'', 120lbs very active and maintain at 2200 a day..
It is a high number for your height/weight/activity level but as others have said, everyones metabolism is different. I'm sure you have super-skinny friends who can eat whatever they want and not gain a single pound. Then there are some who just have to look at a cake to gain! Anyways, if you found that you maintain at that weight then it doensn't matter what any online calulator has to say, you know your body better.0 -
Although I no longer log my food, I am 5'7" and maintaining on 2040 + calories a day. I have a very active job, do HIIT exercises 4 days a week and lift heavy weights 2 to 3 times a week.0
-
Sigh...I wish mine were that high. I don't get it. I am 5'4" and when I was 155 I definitely could not have maintained at those calories. And I was in the gym 5 days a week0
-
I'm currently on 2700 and trying to add some weight back on, was maintaining on 2500 so we'll see what happens over the next few weeks. I've a desk job but lift heavy 4-5 times per week.0
-
Doesn't sound unreasonable to me, I'm 36 and I maintain on 2200 at 133 pounds.0
-
I'm 53 and maintain on an average of 2000-2200 (sometimes more) a day, have a desk job, but I workout six days a week (weight lift 3, run 3, averaging about 6 hours a week), and am otherwise active.0
-
I've eaten like you most of my life. People call it a "high metabolism." I call it a sweet tooth. I generally eat healthy foods, but in somewhat large portions, and I'd usually go and top it off with cheesecake. I think it's just because I was always an active person. When I quit being active the pounds slowly crept on, but even then it was gradual - about 1/4 pound a month, so it took a few years to become a noticeable issue. The heaviest I've been in 132 and I'm 5'5". My average weight is around 125.
I should also note that on a weekly basis I'm losing twice as much weight as the calculator claimed I would with my current calorie deficit, so maybe there really is a need for more calories.0 -
HappyCampr1 wrote: »dontjinxit wrote: »
I should also note that on a weekly basis I'm losing twice as much weight as the calculator claimed I would with my current calorie deficit, so maybe there really is a need for more calories.
I'm pretty much sedentary in life at the moment and I think I have the level set to normal. I guess I just burn calories like an athlete while slacking off and watching tv. I'm thinking that each week I'll add an extra 100 or 200 calories to the daily limit so I can find where I level off.
0 -
At around 280-290 I can probably maintain IF I WORKOUT REGULARLY AND WITH INTENSITY (I workout like an athlete when in shape) 3-4 times a week with like.....3100 Kcals or thereabouts. I set my macros for 2600 to lose slowly and add in some solid state cardio.....
That does seem high for your weight. I am pretty friggun sedentary outside my workouts.0 -
Female, 27, 126 lbs, 5'3, maintaining on 2300ish calories gross on average0
-
I eat around 2300, I'm 65 years old and weigh around 165. No formal excersize, just normal housework and a slow stroll outside in the fresh air most days. I don't diet though.0
-
By the way, the math is all wrong on every diet site. Bmi, calories per day, the calories to subtract for weight loss etc. Non of it can be standardized. Everyones genetics, hormones, individual fat to muscle and bone density is individual and has genetic foundations. Look at your family and see what you are naturally, disregard those eho are anorexic or comtinutally dieting and rebounding and you will be able to estimate your happy 'normal'. I think you are good now as long as you eat around 2500 or more if you get hungry if you are female under 5'8, over 25 years old, and not 'formally' excersizing.0
-
By the way, the math is all wrong on every diet site. Bmi, calories per day, the calories to subtract for weight loss etc. Non of it can be standardized. Everyones genetics, hormones, individual fat to muscle and bone density is individual and has genetic foundations. Look at your family and see what you are naturally, disregard those eho are anorexic or comtinutally dieting and rebounding and you will be able to estimate your happy 'normal'. I think you are good now as long as you eat around 2500 or more if you get hungry if you are female under 5'8, over 25 years old, and not 'formally' excersizing.
I agree with this. It's all averages.
According to charts, I'd be healthy at a BMI of 19, but from my own experiences I very well know that's underweight for me.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions