Cardio vs. Weights

gbjess204
gbjess204 Posts: 27 Member
edited November 13 in Fitness and Exercise
No sources to cite, just what has been heard. Things always go in waves in what is best for health, weight loss, and well, anything else. Eggs were bad in the 90's now its a super food. What I am interested in is what is REALLY best for weight loss cardio training or weight training. I know the more muscle one has, more calorie burn through out the day.

I am stuck in a rut, I was doing only carido, now I have mixed in and equal amount of weight training and not really seeing results. Yes, I am aware that muscle does weigh more than fat, but I measure centimeters weekly, there is not much movement on the measuring tape.

I am at 1,400 cal/ day with actual measuring food on a kitchen scale and just getting frustrated with the plateau.

I would love to hear what people have to say. Please no F*ing b**ch debates.What are your stories and what you have experienced?

Replies

  • cheshirecatastrophe
    cheshirecatastrophe Posts: 1,395 Member
    1. Weight loss is a question of creating a calorie deficit. 99% of that happens in the kitchen.

    2. Cardio exercises burn some calories (generally not as many as we want them to or think they should!) and can help increase that deficit a little.

    3. "Muscle burns more calories than fat"--technically true, but not really enough to make a difference (single digits per day)

    4. Weight lifting while eating at a deficit isn't going to build muscle (can't make something out of nothing); it *will* help preserve as much muscle as you can so the weight you're losing is fat. This is a good thing.

    5. Lifting weights does not burn as many calories as most cardio exercises, so if you've reduced your cardio to make time for weights, you might have to adjust downward how much you're eating a little.

    6. Switching up your workout routine, *especially* weightlifting, can trigger the *appearance* of weight gain/plateau due to water retention. This is true initially; for me, it is also true that my weight increases (generally) 2-4 pounds the morning after I've lifted. If you are doing weights every day and haven't been at it that long, you could still be seeing a water effect. How long have you been strength training?

    7. Weighing your food is great! How are you at logging and tracking overall? Do you sneak little bits of food while serving, eat a lot of guesstimated restaurant meals, etc? (Strength training makes me ravenously hungry and sneaking food in at every change, even subconsciously.)
  • hill8570
    hill8570 Posts: 1,466 Member
    edited February 2015
    ^^^^Can't really add much to what @cheshirecatastrophe said. Good stuff there.
  • BULLET9992
    BULLET9992 Posts: 53 Member
    If your new to lifting or haven't lifted in a while you can see strength gains while at a deficit, especially if your a little chubby. If your already lean or have lifted for a while you'll have to be at a caloric surplus, even if its only 200cal/day to make gains. If you want to lose than stay at a deficit & keep lifting but change your strategy. Like changing weight, reps, & sets to get results. Also if you just started lifting you'll probably stop losing or even gain weight the 1st week or maybe even 2, as your body stores water in the tissue that hasn't been used in a while. Other than that, the 1st commenter was spot on. BTW I'm speaking from experience. I'm making big strength gains while losing weight. But I'm a 22yr old male. 5'11" 200lb
  • gbjess204
    gbjess204 Posts: 27 Member
    I weigh my food by grams and do not sneak bites. I log everything even if I decide to have wine or vodka on weekends. I also measure the oil I use too. I'm not lifting enormous amounts of weights, like 10lb Dumbbells. I do about 50 lbs with the leg attachment on my weight bench.
  • Capt_Apollo
    Capt_Apollo Posts: 9,026 Member
    i am a triathlete, and i incorporate lifting into my routine. i used to think that i could out train my bad diet, and that it wasn't even all that bad to begin with. moderation and all that. i mean, i logged everything, came in just at about my goal. but i stayed at the same weight for about two years. until i really cleaned up my eating and cut way back on alcohol, and i started seeing a drop in weight.

    so lifting or cardio doesn't matter. what and how much you eat does.
  • Wookinpanub
    Wookinpanub Posts: 635 Member
    I lost my weight (60lbs in just over 6 months) doing a lot of cardio, doing some body weight exercises (including some in the sauna), a mixture of weight lifting (novice weight lifter here) and improving my diet. I didn't count calories - just changed some bad habits and would throw in some fasting days here and there. I also had many cheat days, typically on the weekend.


    If you're in a rut, peruse the forums here for tips or search the internets. I also found reading success stories motivating.
  • MB_Positif
    MB_Positif Posts: 8,897 Member
    During my weight loss I did mostly cardio with some strength training. In a year I lost 50 pounds, I was pretty happy with how I looked but over time I started doing more strength training than cardio (right now the only cardio I do is goof around playing sports with my 8 year old son). In a year of focusing more on lifting than anything else I went down 3 more clothing sizes and stayed the same weight, so for me...there's no question strength training "wins" for aesthetic changes. Right now I am bulking to gain muscle and am up 7 pounds from my lowest weight on MFP and still fit in the same clothes.
  • MKEgal
    MKEgal Posts: 3,250 Member
    Everything the kitty said. Yep.

    Here's a post I did about the idea that weightlifting is great because muscle burns more calories than fat, so having more muscle will make you thin without doing much work.
    (Hint, it's not true.)
    Fat burns about 2 cal/lb/day, muscle at rest about 6.
    So yes, there's a difference, but it's not all that big.

    Cardio is better to burn calories, but do keep up on weightlifting so you will maintain muscle mass and be trim & hot when you lose the overlying fat. (And get to some serious/challenging levels, that make you strain, not something that's easy; go for around 80% of your one-repetition maximum, which is exactly what it sounds like).
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    I did both cardio and weights together with a small calorie deficit to lose my weight.
    Followed the MFP "eat back exercise calories" method to fuel my exercise properly.

    The biggest success factor for me was finding a way to adhere to a suitable and sustainable calorie deficit long term - for me that was a version of intermittent fasting but that's where adherence is a very personal thing. Didn't exclude any foods at all.

    It worked.
    Fitter, stronger, healthier, got back to weight I was 30 years ago and maintaining my weight happily.

    If you are stalled for a long time then would look at your food logging and intake rather than your exercise routine in the first instance.
  • Timorous_Beastie
    Timorous_Beastie Posts: 595 Member
    If you're not taking progress photos, add that to your ways of tracking your results.

    When I started lifting, I didn't have much change in my weight or measurements. I started when I was at goal weight. But it made quite a bit of difference in how I looked. My waist measurement stayed the same, but the "muffin top" area between my waist and hips shrunk. My bum got perkier. My arms were a better shape. My back and shoulders had more definition, and that made my waist appear smaller. My stomach was flatter.
  • MB_Positif
    MB_Positif Posts: 8,897 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    I did both cardio and weights together with a small calorie deficit to lose my weight.
    Followed the MFP "eat back exercise calories" method to fuel my exercise properly.

    The biggest success factor for me was finding a way to adhere to a suitable and sustainable calorie deficit long term - for me that was a version of intermittent fasting but that's where adherence is a very personal thing. Didn't exclude any foods at all.

    It worked.
    Fitter, stronger, healthier, got back to weight I was 30 years ago and maintaining my weight happily.

    If you are stalled for a long time then would look at your food logging and intake rather than your exercise routine in the first instance.

    I didn't really say it in my post, but I followed the eat back exercise calories method as well and totally agree with the part about finding a way to adhere to things that are suitable and sustainable for long term. I have been at this for 4 years and 2.5 of those have been maintaining my weight.
  • GiddyupTim
    GiddyupTim Posts: 2,819 Member
    I think it is easier to make your body look better by lifting weights. Running burns more calories. But you have to be really careful because it also makes you REALLY hungry. It is not uncommon for people to start a dedicated running routine and to find they do not lose any weight at all.
  • TBargar101
    TBargar101 Posts: 30 Member

    gbjess204 wrote: »
    No sources to cite, just what has been heard. Things always go in waves in what is best for health, weight loss, and well, anything else. Eggs were bad in the 90's now its a super food. What I am interested in is what is REALLY best for weight loss cardio training or weight training. I know the more muscle one has, more calorie burn through out the day.

    I am stuck in a rut, I was doing only carido, now I have mixed in and equal amount of weight training and not really seeing results. Yes, I am aware that muscle does weigh more than fat, but I measure centimeters weekly, there is not much movement on the measuring tape.

    I am at 1,400 cal/ day with actual measuring food on a kitchen scale and just getting frustrated with the plateau.

    I would love to hear what people have to say. Please no F*ing b**ch debates.What are your stories and what you have experienced?

    I'm not sure why you're measuring food on a scale. I know to estimate caloric intake, but you would need to know the carbohydrate, fat, and protein content of what you're weighing to know the caloric content. You should look at the food labeling to determine caloric content as well as the MFP food database. For those meals that you just cannot find in the database, either create or import recipes to determine caloric content more accurately. It is important to accurately estimate how much you're consuming and then how much you're burning on a daily basis. For the latter, I use a heart rate monitor for estimating calories burned during exercise and the MFP calculator for daily caloric requirements for somebody my height, gender, and age.

    I've been keeping track of calories consumed along with calories burned for the past 7 months using MFP. MFP estimates my caloric needs based on my age, gender, and height, and then tells me how many calories to consume daily based on my desired weight loss rate. I exercise almost every day of the week, both cardio and weight training. I often have a hard time getting out of bed early to exercise (5-530am during the week, later on the weekends), but I do it. I also know that I will be less likely to exercise consistently if I do so in the afternoon (too many competing activities that will win out). I also allow myself to eat some unhealthy foods on occasion to keep my sanity - and do my best to keep track of how much over my daily goal I go! My weight loss has been slow (1 lb per week) and steady.

    During the whole process, I've learned a lot about the calories associated with certain foods and just how much I need to eat to be satisfied.
  • cheshirecatastrophe
    cheshirecatastrophe Posts: 1,395 Member
    TBargar101 wrote: »
    I'm not sure why you're measuring food on a scale. I know to estimate caloric intake, but you would need to know the carbohydrate, fat, and protein content of what you're weighing to know the caloric content.

    You, uh, also have to know how much of it you're eating.

    That's kind of important.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    gbjess204 wrote: »
    I weigh my food by grams and do not sneak bites. I log everything even if I decide to have wine or vodka on weekends. I also measure the oil I use too. I'm not lifting enormous amounts of weights, like 10lb Dumbbells. I do about 50 lbs with the leg attachment on my weight bench.

    I think it'd be good to look into an actual lifting program...SL 5x5, New Rules of Lifting for Women. Those 10 lb dumbbells aren't going to last you long.

    Anyway, strength training in a deficit shows amazing results. I basically do two hours of cardio a week TOPS, usually less. I've lost almost 30 pounds, kept a lot of muscle, and am so happy I'm not sitting in the 130s having lost all my muscle and needing to get into the 120s to look thin enough.
  • hill8570
    hill8570 Posts: 1,466 Member
    TBargar101 wrote: »
    I'm not sure why you're measuring food on a scale

    Because most people overestimate portion sizes if going by eyeball, and measuring by volume is also pretty dicey (portions, and the calorie / macro content thereof are generally spec'd in grams -- any volume portion is very approximate). So if someone, like the OP, is having issues with losing, the first check is make sure the portions being eaten are accurate, thus weighing.

  • hill8570
    hill8570 Posts: 1,466 Member
    OP, if you don't mind a bunch of well-meaning but often annoying suggestions, you might want to make your diary public. Occasionally a fresh eye can see something you might miss.
  • jenluvsushi
    jenluvsushi Posts: 933 Member
    In my experience from when I lost 61 pounds, most of it was through diet. All you need is a caloric deficit to lose weight. When I did finally start working out and lifting heavy, my weight loss REALLY slowed down but I continued to get smaller. If you are going to lift (and I am ALL For that), I would not concentrate on what your scale says. Water weight and lifting go hand and hand. If you aren't getting smaller, you are either over estimating your burn or underestimating your calories. I got to the point that I really didn't care what I weighed. I cared about how I looked and about my body fat % more than anything.
  • minionman
    minionman Posts: 308 Member
    edited February 2015
    I mainly do weights, I don't measure my food, I choose to eat a more nutritious diet, so I can have more and have the best and most effective workout I can. I don't do cardio, cause I mainly do a lot of walking and other things in my daily life. Try doing weights for awhile and see where you end up in a couple of months or so. But by all means, what worked for me might not work for you. Just have fun with it an try not to stress the f$&k out.
  • gbjess204
    gbjess204 Posts: 27 Member
    hill8570 wrote: »
    OP, if you don't mind a bunch of well-meaning but often annoying suggestions, you might want to make your diary public. Occasionally a fresh eye can see something you might miss.

    My Diary is public to friends

  • HeySwoleSister
    HeySwoleSister Posts: 1,938 Member
    10 pound dumbbells are pretty light except for some isolation lifts. Learn some form on the compound lifts and really push yourself in terms of the weights you work with. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised at how good you feel very soon!
This discussion has been closed.