Most Efficient Exercices?

oklm_magl
oklm_magl Posts: 9
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
What are the most efficient exercices you know?

Replies

  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    efficient? As in most cals burned per minute?

    No idea, especially considering all the variables. If I had to guess, I'd say something like sled pulls. Of more traditional exercises, maybe swim intervals?
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    Definite "efficient exercise" please.
  • Most calories burned per minute (thx Jackson)
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    Tabata sprints and other HIIT, but that would only be applicable if you actually put 100% effort into them.
  • SueInAz
    SueInAz Posts: 6,592 Member
    edited March 2015
    The best exercise is one you're going to stick with, of course. What might be most efficient may not be much fun. :-D

    Anything that uses your whole body is going to burn more calories than something that uses only part of it. For example, running burns lots of calories but how much depends on factors including your mass, speed and form. High Intensity Interval Training is also great for burning calories quickly and from what I've read it sounds like the increased calorie burn extends beyond the actual exercise time, too.
  • DWBalboa
    DWBalboa Posts: 37,259 Member
    If you are looking for the highest calorie burn per minute then a Tabata routine or HIIT is what you want. Swimming, sprinting, jumping rope, hitting the heavy bag, or hitting the stairs are also killers. But you can do a HIIT right in your own living room, dorm room or hotel room.

    Read these articles;

    http://www.shape.com/blogs/working-it-out/research-approved-20-minute-tabata-workout

    http://www.shape.com/fitness/cardio/5-ways-burn-500-calories-30-minutes

    Good luck
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    I feel like this is hard to answer because something might burn a lot of calories but you might only do it for a short period of time because it is so intensive. Running a 5 minute mile would burn more calories per minute than a 10 minute mile but it only takes half as long so the final burn for both miles could be close to equal.
  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    I dunno, some people like to get a lot of calorie burn / muscle engagement for their buck, but I think it's better to take a longer time if you have to, so you can do movements correctly.
  • kbmnurse
    kbmnurse Posts: 2,484 Member
    I love the Leslie Sansone walking DVD's I have been doing since 1/1/15. I can see a big difference in the way my clothes fit. Low impact but, a great workout. I add 3 lbs weights to each workout to add some extra cal burn. B)
  • mhildreth66
    mhildreth66 Posts: 24 Member
    for me is Spinning! I burn 600-800 during a 60 minute class with 5 minute warm up and 5 minute cool down. Not to mention the calories i continue to burn AFTER class :-)
  • qn4bx9pzg8aifd
    qn4bx9pzg8aifd Posts: 258 Member
    edited March 2015
    I've come to see "efficient" as having two (albeit functionally related) meanings, in this context.

    1) a calories/minute 'burn' rate
    2) a total body 'impact' aspect

    For me -- and we all have different preferences, tendencies, etc., when it comes to exercise (let alone, different bodies, and potential physical, medical condition, and/or endocrinological or physiological realities to accommodate, contend with, or otherwise 'factor in') -- I seem to prefer a kind of 'best of both worlds' aspect, when it comes to exercise... I like to do things which combine cardio and strength... and the more 'full body' -like any given activity's involvement/impact/effect, the better.

    And to boot, those activities which happen to be a part of 'things which have to get done anyway', are a kind of functional set of actions which comprise a form of 'stealth' exercise for me (or so I like to think :) ).

    Regardless, if one does certain things long enough (as in, frequently or consistently enough, let alone when considering it from an ongoing endurance perspective), the body becomes more efficient 'at' it (and in a number of ways, including many physiological and neuromuscular aspects), and the associated calorie burn rate can decrease, in conjunction with such, but that doesn't mean that the exercise is not of benefit (of course).


    As it turns out to be, for me, the most efficient total body, calories burned per minute, strength + cardio 'exercise'/'workout' that I've yet engaged in, happens to be the shoveling of a huge amount of ice-addled, very wet (and *heavy*) snow, after a blizzard -- which involves arms, shoulders, back, legs, lifting, pushing, twisting, 'chopping', ongoing work that is total body, core- and cardio-intense -- and it's an activity I don't truly have any say in determining the 'timing' or frequency of, given that I don't have control of the weather, nor do I have a snow(-manufacturing) machine (nor would I *want* to engage in that as a regular workout activity -- I need some sun, warmth, Spring, and Summer!)... ;)

    ...as SueInAz conveyed --
    SueInAz wrote: »
    The best exercise is one you're going to stick with, of course. What might be most efficient may not be much fun. :-D
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    This is making me think of that 4 minute ROM machine that is advertised in the back of Popular Mechanics.
  • yusaku02
    yusaku02 Posts: 3,472 Member
    Run fast for an extended period of time :)
    (like 7min/mile for 10 miles?)
  • qn4bx9pzg8aifd
    qn4bx9pzg8aifd Posts: 258 Member
    jemhh wrote: »
    This is making me think of that 4 minute ROM machine that is advertised in the back of Popular Mechanics.

    ...omg... if there is one ad that has consistently resulted in my experiencing a kind of 'full body' 'rolling of the eyes' (and as much as what I've just expressed is rather difficult to visualize ;) ), that ad would be it...

    I cannot help wondering, when I've chanced upon that ad, whether anyone actually buys it -- literally, or figuratively... the claims are one thing, and the (insane) price tag, another... but what also amazes me is that they've been advertising that form of crazy for as long as they have (how are they still in business?! -- and how do they afford the ads?!)...
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,095 Member
    oklm_magl wrote: »
    What are the most efficient exercices you know?
    The ones that people will actually do. A Muay Thai push up is awesome. But if one can't do it, it's pretty inefficient.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 49,095 Member
    jemhh wrote: »
    This is making me think of that 4 minute ROM machine that is advertised in the back of Popular Mechanics.
    Which is basically a Tabata protocol exercise regimen. The idea is to go all out for the 4 minutes. And it does work. But I'm not paying no $5,000 for a machine.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • qn4bx9pzg8aifd
    qn4bx9pzg8aifd Posts: 258 Member
    edited March 2015
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    This is making me think of that 4 minute ROM machine that is advertised in the back of Popular Mechanics.
    Which is basically a Tabata protocol exercise regimen. The idea is to go all out for the 4 minutes. And it does work. But I'm not paying no $5,000 for a machine.

    While, technically, any kind of exercise will do *something*, what the ad for this machine claims those 4 minutes will do -- and are 'equivalent' to -- is ridiculous. Also, the last I knew, the price tag was over $15,000 (which is crazy!).
  • qn4bx9pzg8aifd
    qn4bx9pzg8aifd Posts: 258 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    A Muay Thai push up is awesome. But if one can't do it, it's pretty inefficient.

    I hadn't yet learned of this form of push up... and (after watching its awesomeness executed in a few youtube videos) while I cannot fathom my having the ability to do such (it would be one heckuva remarkable feat if I ever did :) ), I nonetheless thank you for having mentioned it (I never know what I'm going to learn from any given thread, which is a cool reality :) ).
  • DopeItUp
    DopeItUp Posts: 18,771 Member
    RKC planks.
  • AllanMisner
    AllanMisner Posts: 4,140 Member
    Wall balls. A good set of them will work just about every muscle in your body and is so metabolically challenging, if you could do it for an extended period of time, the calorie burn will be fantastic.
  • techgal128
    techgal128 Posts: 719 Member
    oklm_magl wrote: »
    What are the most efficient exercices you know?

    The exercises you actually do. ;)
  • Robertus
    Robertus Posts: 558 Member
    Swimming, especially the Butterfly stroke. No contest.
  • Robertus
    Robertus Posts: 558 Member
    And, believe it or not, motocross. Motocross athletes have the lowest body fat percentage of all. It comes from constantly fighting, flying and repeatedly landing such a machine with a high powered engine.
  • I thought bikers just sit on their bikes, thx I learnt something new Robertus (y)
  • EricLFC1892
    EricLFC1892 Posts: 85 Member
    one word.. Burpees
  • atypicalsmith
    atypicalsmith Posts: 2,742 Member
    The most efficient one for me is my exerbike. I bought it years ago, and it's one of those that the handles move as well as the pedals so that both your arms and legs are moving at the same time. I watch television while using it, so I'm not bored.
  • MKEgal
    MKEgal Posts: 3,250 Member
    I love this answer!
    for me, the most efficient total body, calories burned per minute, strength + cardio 'exercise'/'workout' that I've yet engaged in, happens to be the shoveling of a huge amount of ice-addled, very wet (and *heavy*) snow, after a blizzard - which involves arms, shoulders, back, legs, lifting, pushing, twisting, 'chopping', ongoing work that is total body, core- and cardio-intense - and it's an activity I don't truly have any say in determining the 'timing' or frequency of, given that I don't have control of the weather, nor do I have a snow(-manufacturing) machine (nor would I *want* to engage in that as a regular workout activity - I need some sun, warmth, Spring, and Summer!).
    .
    funny-happy-horse-laughing-love-this-post-pics.jpg
  • MKEgal
    MKEgal Posts: 3,250 Member
    edited March 2015
    High-intensity interval (cardio) training is an efficient way of burning calories, losing body fat, increasing fitness, stamina, & oxygen consumption, and losing inches off the waist.


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23210120
    Evidence based exercise - clinical benefits of high intensity interval training


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25675374
    EPOC Comparison Between Isocaloric Bouts of Steady-State Aerobic, Intermittent Aerobic, and Resistance Training
    Excess postexercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) is dependent on intensity, duration, and mode of exercise. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of both exercise mode and intensity on EPOC while controlling for caloric expenditure and duration ... Both [weightlifting] and [HIIT] aerobic work increased EPOC to a greater degree than did [steady state aerobic] work, indicating that either mode may be more effective at increasing total daily caloric expenditure than [steady state] aerobic exercise.
    So keep doing the weightlifting to maintain muscle mass, because it's just as good
    for the afterburn as HIIT.


    I'm going be trying this.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24905559
    Running sprint interval training induces fat loss in women
    Fifteen recreationally active women ... completed 6 weeks of running [sprint interval training] (4 to 6, 30-second "all-out" sprints on a self-propelled treadmill separated by 4 min of rest performed 3 times per week). Training decreased body fat mass by 8.0% ... waist circumference by 3.5% ... it increased fat-free mass by 1.3% ... maximal oxygen consumption by 8.7% ... and peak running speed by 4.8% ... Running [sprint interval training] is a time-efficient strategy for decreasing body fat while increasing aerobic capacity, peak running speed, and fat-free mass in healthy young women.
This discussion has been closed.