DEXA Body Scan - Shed Fat, Not Weight
Options
![BeckiSwim19](https://dakd0cjsv8wfa.cloudfront.net/images/photos/user/63fa/75b7/5654/b140/2b99/7e63/ffe3/902fae60a3dfba0c64dfd96c6996ebc9b473.jpg)
BeckiSwim19
Posts: 22 Member
This is incredibly interesting! I suggest everyone looking to shed any unwanted pounds takes a look at the video below. Towards the end - it talks about his comparison with another man.
Jamie Aldertons DEXA BodyScan RESULTS!:
http://youtu.be/JD6DUYZPAmU
Jamie Aldertons DEXA BodyScan RESULTS!:
![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/JD6DUYZPAmU/0.jpg)
0
Replies
-
23 minutes?
Can you give a précis please0 -
Summary :-
Dexa is "gold standard" for body composition.
Leanest guy 13.5% body fat
Tallest guy they've had
need to be centred on table and still
scan takes a couple of minutes or less
analysis takes longer -https://youtu.be/JD6DUYZPAmU?t=303
10.4 kilos of fat, very little, 12.3% body fat. Best seen in 6 weeks in London. Lowest 2% compared to test database of US subjects.
27.8 BMI due to muscle.
A few hundred grams only of visceral fat.
Fat mass index 3.63 (not defined)
http://www.bodyscanuk.com/
3.8kg of bone (skeleton) - quite heavy
71kg of fat free (lean) mass0 -
I've had one. The results were that my ideal body fat % meant that my ideal weight is 75kg which is 4 kg above the top weight of my BMI range. I apparently have above average muscle mass for a woman. It was very enlightening although they give you these x-ray images of the scan in which you can see your skeleton and then your muscle and then all this puffy white fat around everything (assuming you are overweight) which made me look like I am wearing a giant fat suit (which I am). It also tells you how much visceral fat you have. I plan to have another when I get to 75kg and see what the results are.0
-
-
Dexa scans come with all kinds of error bars. The unfortunate reality is that even the "gold standard" for fat analysis isn't super accurate.
One day....!0 -
-
0
-
I've had a dexa, and i've also used the bodpod.
I'm not sure where you might be able to get yours done, but i had mine done at the Memorial Hermann Iron Man Sports Medicine Institute, where my orthopedic surgeon was.
They offer a la carte performance testing.
I'd look to see if theres a place in your area that offers it.
I paid a total of $250.00 for both of these to be done as they are not covered by insurance.
Also, this was a few years ago. But it is the entire reason i switched to lifting weights and cutting my cardio. I had a significant amount of fat, after i reached my initial "goal weight" at 27% and 118 pounds and 5'4.0 -
Yeah, and worth every penny, right?0
-
It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!0
-
atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
I don't think anyone would consider a Dexa scan as a quick fix, it doesn't do anything to help you lose weight. I would consider it a tool for someone who really wanted to know their BF percentage and who cared about lowering it to a certain level. If someone is interested enough to want to pay for it, and it will help motivate them on their journey, I don't see any problem with it.0 -
I'm personally going to ask my GP for a DEXA order at my physical this fall. I've been recommended to have a baseline bone density scan, and I figure I should ask for the DEXA in that context. According to my OB radiologist, I've got 10+ years until menopause (I have a cyst on an ovary they are monitoring, and they keep telling me my ladynuts look 10 years younger than they are. Boo, I don't need them anymore.)0
-
atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
0 -
atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
How is a Dexa a "quick fix" in any way, shape, or form? Please explain your rationale because I'm not seeing it.0 -
blankiefinder wrote: »atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
I don't think anyone would consider a Dexa scan as a quick fix, it doesn't do anything to help you lose weight. I would consider it a tool for someone who really wanted to know their BF percentage and who cared about lowering it to a certain level. If someone is interested enough to want to pay for it, and it will help motivate them on their journey, I don't see any problem with it.
I agree. This would purely be for personal interest. Within my swimming squad they conduct skin fold testing. Although it may be free, I do not accept the results. It doesn't represent body fat percentage well due to subjectivity of who takes the measurements, the tool used etc.
0 -
atypicalsmith wrote: »(which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't)
Just DO IT!
So you tried to quit smoking but didn't?
And then you tell people to just do it?
Seems a bit contradictory
I'm not a smoker but those smoking patches sound like they would be helpful for someone with a bit of will power and planning. So they aren't going cold turkey.
Like how people suggest small changes when starting to eat healthy, like cutting down on fizzy drinks etc
Instead of going from 4000 cal of pizza and junk a day to 2000 fruit and veg and lean meats over night.
0 -
atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
Do you even know what a Dexa scan is? I'm guessing not.0 -
I had a dexa scan done when I had a bone density test. it cost $50. I am 163 cm and was 49 kilos then. I had more fat than muscles by a mile. I have since taken up exercising 5 x a week and incorporating some light weights too. I will go back in 2 years to check bone density again. I have begun supplements as I am in a high risk category. Dexan scan is the best way we have to see how we are tracking0
-
atypicalsmith wrote: »It kills me to see how much money people are making off of people who want to lose weight, quit smoking, etc. Nicorette has been around for at least 35 years (which is the age of my son, when I decided to quit but didn't) and it's STILL around. If it worked, nobody would be smoking. Stop looking for a quick fix, people. Just DO IT!
@atypicalsmith DEXA isn't a quick fix…
It's a tool used to determine body fat % and LBM. It doesn't miraculously shed the pounds.0 -
I wouldn't mind getting one of these scans. But more when I get closer to my goal weight.
I hope I'm not losing muscle too much. I do cardio and some strength training and I keep putting my weights up every other week or so, suggests to me I'm gaining a little muscle at least.
According to my super "accurate" scale I have 30% body fat which if my math is correct, if I was to get to about 15-17% body fat I would be like 90kg which I think is above the healthy weight ranges I see.
Having a more accurate bf% would let me be more accurate in my goal.
I don't want to get down to the healthy weight range and find I lost 5-10kg of muscle to do it.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 398 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 977 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions