Is Stationary Bike Really A Waste Of Time?

Options
24

Replies

  • LITtlerMeCO
    LITtlerMeCO Posts: 130 Member
    Options
    Snooozie wrote: »
    moving ANY of your parts, in ANY way, for any length of time... is NEVER a waste of time.

    About 60% of my gym time is spent on a bike, 20% yoga, 10% Pilates, and 10% weight training. I've lost 51 pounds, but more importantly, I am able to fit into a couple of pairs of size 12 pants I couldn't get more than an inch or two past my knees last February.

    I'm fine with the people who judge the bike as being inferior because while they are waiting for space in the weight area or to use the "better" machines (and wasting their workout time standing around) means I don't have to fight them for the one that has worked for me.

  • BuckyArden33
    BuckyArden33 Posts: 146 Member
    Options
    i hook my mountain bike up to my turbo trainer and keep my heart rate around 140bpm. works for me
  • JeffS435
    JeffS435 Posts: 133 Member
    Options
    The way I see most people on stationary bikes at the gym it is a worthless way to spend your time. Most are not going fast enough to break a sweat
  • matthew_garcia
    matthew_garcia Posts: 16 Member
    Options
    I love to go for bike rides . the longer the better. Sometimes weather does not allow me to do so. I have an indoor trainer that I use on really windy days. When I'm done, I'm soaked. No one is going to tell me that I'm not burning calories. The bottom line is, do what you like. the fact that you're doing some type of exercise is what's important. Too many people discourage one type of workout to another,and based on what, because they don't like it?If you like it ,that's all that matters.
  • moxie1962
    moxie1962 Posts: 165 Member
    Options
    Anytime you get your body moving is a good thing. Your legs are the largest muscles in your body, so working them, even on a stationary bike....is worth something.
  • melodyis4reals
    melodyis4reals Posts: 186 Member
    Options
    I love riding my stationary bike while I watch tv. I will ride for an hour long show. The harder I pedal, the more I sweat! It's better then sitting in the couch!
  • darrensurrey
    darrensurrey Posts: 3,942 Member
    Options
    iwlf wrote: »
    It's a waste of time if you're trying to go from point "A" to point "B". (It is stationary!) However, for cardio work, it's great!

    :D

  • wizzybeth
    wizzybeth Posts: 3,573 Member
    Options
    It can be an intense workout! I do spin class 2x a week and we are up and down off the seat, do different speeds & different resistance levels...yesterday I did 20 mins on a Recumbent bike and had sweat running into my eyes...so yeah...it can be a workout if you make it one. :)
  • Michael190lbs
    Michael190lbs Posts: 1,510 Member
    edited April 2015
    Options
    I have walked around at 250 plus pounds my entire life (16-46 years) always lifted weights with low cardio last may I bought a bike that I ride six days a week 14-20 miles for 45-60 min. I was 201 this morning and the only variables that have changed in the last year is More protein/fat less carbs/sugar controled calories and that bike!! I feel Fantastic and love my bike!!

    fytmxytoffjk.png


  • lulucitron
    lulucitron Posts: 366 Member
    Options
    I mix it up between the bike, step mill and skipping between weights...would love to run but running doesn't love me. I don't want to lose any muscle so I don't do high intensity cardio for long periods. Just a steady state to get a good sweat and that's it, or if I'm doing a HIIT workout just for short bursts between sets. I super set as well and don't rest long between sets to keep my heart rate up and steady. Combine that with good nutrition and that gets me the results I want.
  • aubreyjordan
    aubreyjordan Posts: 276 Member
    Options
    wizzybeth wrote: »
    It can be an intense workout! I do spin class 2x a week and we are up and down off the seat, do different speeds & different resistance levels...yesterday I did 20 mins on a Recumbent bike and had sweat running into my eyes...so yeah...it can be a workout if you make it one. :)

    I do spin as well 2 to 3 times a week for ~40-50 minutes at a time. I'm pouring sweat and my heart rate averages in the 130s to 140s, peaking in the 150s to 160s (I have a heart condition and am on medication that keeps my heart rate down, so I usually peak in the 150s). I burn anywhere from 350 to 450 calories (based on my polar ft7). Like wizzybeth said, it's a workout if you make it one.
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,574 Member
    Options
    I love the stationary bike. I'm more focused on lifting and don't care if I don't burn a ton of calories. Sometimes I just hop on for 10-20 minutes at steady state to help pad my deficit, sometimes I go all out on intervals if I want to burn the extra few calories.
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    Options
    The effectiveness comes down to the quality of the bike. A high HR without the corresponding work load is meaningless. Some bikes provide a great workout, some are the equivalent of spinning out the pedals while going downhill.
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    Options
    tomatoey wrote: »
    It's not great for calorie burns

    Based on what? Its completely dependent on duration and intensity like all cardio. OP if you feel your heart is racing and you are experiencing that shortness of breath then you will be trying hard. People sweat at different temperatures, but you know your own body and should exercise based on that. Keep track of your times and distances, then you know when you are improving and when you are slacking. If you put the effort in then in terms of cardio burn its right up there with the best of them. Ive been using bike and rower, tend to find the bike easier, but its up to e to increase intensity and duration so its not easy. You do get to look around and its easier to listen to music.

    I prefer the spin bikes as they feel more like a normal nike.
  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    edited April 2015
    Options
    999tigger wrote: »
    tomatoey wrote: »
    It's not great for calorie burns

    Based on what? Its completely dependent on duration and intensity like all cardio. OP if you feel your heart is racing and you are experiencing that shortness of breath then you will be trying hard. People sweat at different temperatures, but you know your own body and should exercise based on that. Keep track of your times and distances, then you know when you are improving and when you are slacking. If you put the effort in then in terms of cardio burn its right up there with the best of them. Ive been using bike and rower, tend to find the bike easier, but its up to e to increase intensity and duration so its not easy. You do get to look around and its easier to listen to music.

    I prefer the spin bikes as they feel more like a normal nike.

    Based on the amount I burn in 30 mins on a bike compared to what I burn on the elliptical or just walking on the treadmill.

    I switch between all those. But, I still mostly bike, because I have joint issues. I always do intervals, and I always use as much resistance as makes sense, and I keep the revolutions per minute between 100 and 160.

    And even then, it's still only roughly equivalent at that point. However, my thighs are looking shapelier and I'm sure the bike is what's making the difference there.
  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    Options
    also - it's not weight bearing exercise, which we need to help our bones. so it's good to mix it up with other things.

    but it's not a waste of time, at all, you can def get a lot out of it, but you have to work hard.
  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    Options
    arditarose wrote: »
    I love the stationary bike. I'm more focused on lifting and don't care if I don't burn a ton of calories. Sometimes I just hop on for 10-20 minutes at steady state to help pad my deficit, sometimes I go all out on intervals if I want to burn the extra few calories.

    also yeah, apparently it doesn't interfere with weightlifting as much as some other forms of cardio.

    so yeah, those are the things i know about biking.
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    Options
    tomatoey wrote: »
    also - it's not weight bearing exercise, which we need to help our bones. so it's good to mix it up with other things.

    but it's not a waste of time, at all, you can def get a lot out of it, but you have to work hard.

    Its weight bearing when you are out of the saddle. You are better off doing resistance training for bone density, which will be far more effective.

    How much you burn is mostly dependent on your weight as well as the intensity and duration. Just because you dont seem to burn much is more of a reflection on how hard you are working relative to the other machine and has no bearing on how hard the ops workout is.
  • tomatoey
    tomatoey Posts: 5,446 Member
    edited April 2015
    Options
    999tigger wrote: »
    tomatoey wrote: »
    also - it's not weight bearing exercise, which we need to help our bones. so it's good to mix it up with other things.

    but it's not a waste of time, at all, you can def get a lot out of it, but you have to work hard.

    Its weight bearing when you are out of the saddle. You are better off doing resistance training for bone density, which will be far more effective.

    How much you burn is mostly dependent on your weight as well as the intensity and duration. Just because you dont seem to burn much is more of a reflection on how hard you are working relative to the other machine and has no bearing on how hard the ops workout is.

    I work my butt off on any machine I get on, thanks. The OP may well get a nice burn, I haven't said anything about that. I'm saying that in comparison to other activities it just doesn't burn as many calories. People can investigate that for themselves to see it's true.

    Some people actually can't weight train for one reason or another. Sometimes, those are the same people who have to use bikes. For them/us, walking is an excellent activity for bone density.

    also lol @ "weightbearing when you get out of the saddle" - it's likely not enough.
  • 999tigger
    999tigger Posts: 5,235 Member
    Options
    You completely miss the point which is bikes can be great for cardio burns if you work hard enough in terms of intensity and duration, then the burn is limited only by the person on the machine.

    Heres a review of machines. Sorry you cnat manage to get a decent burn off a bike compared to walking, but if you work hard enough then ofc you can achieve high rates of burn.

    The only thing you have to back up that according to you bikes dont burn many calories is that you dont burn many when working your butt off.
    In can be intimidating to walk into the gym and see row upon row of shiny contraptions with belts, chains and gears. The vast array of cardio machines is dizzying. But when it comes to getting results, boosting your fitness and shrinking your waistline, the best cardio machine is the one that burns the most calories. In this article, I'll review the most popular machines -- the ones you'll probably find in both the poshest exclusive health clubs and the hole-in-the-wall hotels. You'll learn which ones burn the most calories and how to use them properly.

    The bike

    The pedaling motion of the bike incorporates the big and powerful leg muscles and can burn 500-1,000 calories per hour, which ranks it among the highest calorie burners (as long as you use it correctly). But most people don't choose a resistance that is high enough to stimulate all the calorie-burning leg muscles, and instead let the natural movement of a bicycle's pedals do the work for them. To get maximum benefit from a bike, choose a resistance that makes you breathe hard at 90 RPM (revolutions per minute). Most stationary bicycles show RPM on the computer display.

    The treadmill

    Running on a treadmill can burn 600-1,200 calories per hour, and running up an incline on the treadmill is the best way to boost your metabolism for hours after you've finished your workout. In contrast, walking on the treadmill burns only 150-400 calories per hour, depending on your speed and incline. If you're using a treadmill, then either run or jog (if your joints can handle it) or walk up a steep incline. Avoid the common mistake of constantly holding on to the handrails. These should only be used if you have extreme balance difficulties or must stabilize yourself to change a setting.

    The elliptical

    You generally burn about 600 calories per hour on the ellipticals that don't include arm movement, and 700-900 calories on the ones that do. Using an elliptical burns fewer calories than running because once you get the parts on an elliptical moving, they use momentum to keep going, and you expend less energy. To get the best results on an elliptical, use the rails as little as possible, and challenge yourself with the resistance settings. You should be breathing hard while aiming for a cadence or stride rate of 120-140+ (this is shown on the display). If you don't feel your muscles contracting during the forward and back stroke of the elliptical, then you probably need to increase resistance.

    The Stairmaster

    Although the stairmaster is popular, it doesn't get great results. It incorporates small, low-calorie burning calf muscles, and just a small part of your upper thighs and butt -- and only burns at most 400-500 calories per hour. In addition, if you have low back pain, then you may find that the pain is aggravated during the up and down motion of the Stairmaster.

    However, if you are lucky enough to have access to the kind of machine where you walk up a moving belt of stairs (like a stationary staircase), then you can get far better results. It will give you just as much calorie-burning benefit as running up an incline on a treadmill, and do a fantastic job toning your butt and thighs. While using it, try holding dumbbells or switching to a slow pace and taking 3-4 steps at a time.

    The rowing machine

    The rowing machine can burn over 1,000 calories per hour, and it's an excellent upper and lower body muscular endurance and cardiovascular workout. But it can be boring. To make things more interesting on the rowing machine, try to intersperse short periods of very hard pulling with easy pulling. For instance: row for 250 meters as hard as possible, then row 100 meters easy, and repeat 6-8 times. When rowing, use both your torso and legs -- not just your arms.

    No matter which form of cardio you choose, be sure to regularly switch things up and incorporate new forms of cardio that are unfamiliar to your body. So if you always walk, then switch to cycling or the elliptical; or if you always run, then try rowing. This will ensure that your body is constantly challenged and burning as many calories as possible.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-greenfield/best-cardio-machines_b_1035202.html