Polar A300 or Fitbit Charge HR?

I recently got the Polar a300 and I love it!!! It is completely waterproof, and yes you do need a chest strap to measure your heart rate but it is far more accurate than the Fitbit HR. Also, I prefer the polar app to the Fitbit app. Overall its an awesome watch! It tracks sleep patters, steps etc.

I have a Polar chest strap HRM and the Charge HR. The Polar chest strap HRM is accurate, the Charge HR is not. I still enjoy the steps part of the Charge HR. Also the sleep mode is accurate and i like looking at the graph and times i was restless and woke up during the night.

I got the Polar A300 exactly a week ago today. I LOVE IT! You only need to wear the strap when you are actually working out. Otherwise, throughout the day the watch counts your steps and does everything the fitbit does and more. As they have mentioned above, it is completely waterproof, very user friendly, the app is helpful and informative. And a petty plus is that you can switch out the bands to different colors. I bought a black watch but bought a yellow band for my kids to wrap up for Mother's Day. I don't even know if I have ever been so excited for Mother's Day lol.

I can't tell you enough how much I recommend it.

I've got the a300's bigger brother. Some friends have the fit bit charge hr. The chest strap is way more accurate during exercise than the light sensor (get alot of anomallys ) I prefer the polar.

fabotih10 wrote: »

Thanks for all the info! I'm still having a hard time deciding.

It would help if you describe what you plan on using an exercise / tracking device for. What do you do?

Bumping because I'd like to know if it will sync on Android?

I came online to ask this exact question tonight. I have purchased the fit bit HR I do not find the steps accurate, from point A home to point B work in a car it says my steps are from 200 to 500. The heart rate monitor also does not seem accurate compared to the monitors on the machines in the gym. Looking into the reviews polar with the waistband is much more accurate I'm looking to keep my heart rate at the optimal level during my workouts running, kickboxing and kayaking. I will not be able to wear my fit bit in the ocean while kayaking so I think I'm going to exchange it for the polar thanks for all the above advice

Steps on the charge hr I find to be quite accurate, more than my phone was and more constant because it's always on you. I don't know about the A300 and whether it tracks your daily activity/TDEE the way fitbits do, but that's my favorite thing about my Fitbit. If you log accurately and setup correctly with mfp you'll find you can eat back step based calories and lose the expected amount per week.

However it's not designed for intense cardio tracking. But i already owned a basic polar chest strap for that. Keep in mind that an HRM won't be accurate for non steady state cardio anyway--strength training, circuit training, etc-- almost worthless no matter where you buy it.

Chest strap HRM are far more accurate than wrist. That's something else in favor of the Polar A300 + H7. The A300 will also do HR while swimming, don't know if that was listed specifically.

I currently have a Polar Loop + H7 and am waiting impatiently to upgrade to an A300.

Downside of Polar (UNLESS YOU HAVE IPHONE) it does not play well with MFP on andriod platforms.

I am trying to decide which tracker to get