We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Suunto Ambit - Calories burned

FatMoojor
FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
I have seen a few threads on here about various fitness trackers giving overly large calorie burns and I wondered if anyone else has a Suunto Ambit R and how they feel it's calorie tracking is.

My stats are:

Male, 5'8", 164lbs, 20% BF (measured from scales so probably not accurate)

Details from Movescount -
1. Treadmill workout - 1:00, 9km, 160 average hr, 925 calories
2. Trail run - 1:50, 18.2km, 152 average hr, 1350 calories

For the above runs in MFP using "Running (jogging), 5 mph (12 min mile)"

1. 596 calories
2. 1092 calories

If you then use the advice that MFP actually overestimates runs and only eat back 50% of calories from its numbers that would mean

1. 293 calories
2. 546 calories

The difference between using 50% of MFP at eating back what my Ambit says I burnt is huge. I guess my question is "which of the following is the best idea?"

1. Use the numbers from my Ambit, eat back a portion of the calories burnt.
2. Use the numbers from MFP exercise and eat back 50%
3. Ignore both sets of numbers and just go all out pure TDEE calcs.

I have got to a point where I am almost happy with my weight and want to move in to maintenance and am just not sure which is the best way to track CI/CO

Replies

  • nicklippa
    nicklippa Posts: 31 Member
    Hello, I have quick question as I have used 3 watches in the last 2 years, Garmin Fenix 2, Suunto Ambit 2S and my current Polar v800. You don't say if you are using a Heart Rate Monitor during your runs, can you clarify this? I just ran a 10K with my Polar watch and here are my numbers from Polar Flow:

    Duration 58:02, Distance 10.08km, 5:45 min/km Average Pace, 4:00 min/km Max Pace, 153BPM average/ 166BPM Max, 791 Calories. So I would guess your Movescount numbers are too high because I am 5'8, 174lbs and 13% BF (fitbit scale). I found when I used the HRM across all devices, the numbers are usually within small percentages of each other. When I started my journey to my weight loss, I used devices entry level devices like fitbit or jawbone, good ideas but IMO calories were all theoretical where now I am getting consistency.

    Let me know if you are using an HRM with your Suunto? By the way Suunto makes great watches and I would have kept the Ambit 2 if it had wireless sync like my Polar v800 does.

  • FatMoojor
    FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
    edited June 2015
    Sorry, yes all runs with my ambit are done using the HRM. Having a look back through my runs the calorie burn is pretty much constant.

    Just checked my stats in movescount. had me @ 5'10 and 12lbs heavier. I should probably also do a full resting heart rate check again.

    So have corrected this and will have a look what it says when I head out on Saturday.
  • nicklippa
    nicklippa Posts: 31 Member
    Well for sure that makes sense now as the watches really don't lie. It really is x X y = z but x and y have to be correct.
  • FatMoojor
    FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
    Cheers for the reply nick. Seeing your stats etc was the nudge to make me recheck mine.
  • FatMoojor
    FatMoojor Posts: 483 Member
    So just plugged in my watch with the correct stats and it is showing 800 calories burned which puts me closer your numbers nick.
    I think I'll just go with the numbers from my watch and eat about 75%/80% and track how that goes over time and my predicted loss.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories