We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Heart rate monitor calories burned vs other

PhilipHall
PhilipHall Posts: 37 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
I have a garmin chest strap that I use with a Garmin monitor and other Garmin sensors on my bike to track cadence, speed and heart rate. The Garmin website gives on reading for calories used and the Strava website shows a very different number. The generic number on MFP is very high compared to these two.

Anyone know of a way to estimate calories burned so I know which of these is correct. Garmin seems to be the more accurate one. Example: 30 min on the bike avg 16.4 mph with an avg heart rate of 160 bpm (yes I'm out of shape and I have a high max hr of 203), Garmin shows 463 cals burned and Strava shows 217. Any way to confirm one of these is accurate?

Replies

  • BrianSharpe
    BrianSharpe Posts: 9,248 Member
    I tend to trust my Garmin (I'm using the HRM & cadence sensor too) it comes in far lower than many other calculators I've seen (including MFP) but I suspect to really get an accurate number you'd need to know how many watts you were putting out and that can get a little pricey!
  • PhilipHall
    PhilipHall Posts: 37 Member
    The Garmin is about half of whats in MFP but Strava records it at about half of what Garmin does. I'm just curious why. Thanks for the input! I have been using the Garmin numbers and will continue to unless someone can explain why its wrong.

    Thanks again.
    Philip
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    What are you using the number for, exactly?
  • PhilipHall
    PhilipHall Posts: 37 Member
    I put it in MFP as the calories I have burned for that exercise. I'm just trying to have the most accurate data available.
  • hermann341
    hermann341 Posts: 443 Member
    I've had several HRMs including Polar and the one that came with my Timex Global trainer. I always trusted them more than the machines, usually because I've put my stats in the watches I wear with the chest strap. I think using the same source of data all the time is going to be more consistent, and therefore better.
  • Mr_Knight
    Mr_Knight Posts: 9,532 Member
    PhilipHall wrote: »
    I put it in MFP as the calories I have burned for that exercise. I'm just trying to have the most accurate data available.

    After a few weeks, your actual vs expected weight loss will tell you how accurate your burn numbers are (assuming the food logging is accurate!)
This discussion has been closed.

Categories