Wheat belly? Is wheat bad for losing weight?

CharonCharon wrote: »

I love things like barley, wheat bran cereal, brown rice, bulgur wheat, etc.
I saw a show on PBS saying that wheat was bad for my weight loss?
What? Really?
Why?
How can something that makes me feel so nice and full and makes me happy in the bathroom be making fouling up my weight loss?

Only folks with specific issues related to gluten have to stay away from barley and wheat.

Wheat belly is a good book and mentions the changes wheat has gone thru since ancient times. Still in our modern lives we are stuck eating the mass produced wheat. It is another diet that tells you wheat might not be that good for you. Yes I read the book. http://www.webmd.com/diet/wheat-belly-diet-review

My mum and sister call their bellies a "wheat belly". My mum particularly eats a lot of it. She goes through a loaf of bread in 2 days, and has 6 or more weetbix every morning for breakfast. She is a skinny little rake, but has that pot belly.

UltimateRBF wrote: »

CharonCharon wrote: »

I love things like barley, wheat bran cereal, brown rice, bulgur wheat, etc.
I saw a show on PBS saying that wheat was bad for my weight loss?
What? Really?
Why?
How can something that makes me feel so nice and full and makes me happy in the bathroom be making fouling up my weight loss?

It's not. Unless you have celiac disease or an allergy to wheat, it's not bad.

I'd also add that some people have allergies to ingredients (or allergies to certain pesticides used on ingredients) found in products like wheat breads, but not the actual wheat or gluten, and will often mistake that for a wheat or gluten allergy. Which is another reason why sometimes wheat gets a bad rap.

I lost all my weight while eating wheat and gluten products every single day. Again, as long as your calories in are lower than your calories out, you will lose weight. It does not matter what foods you eat if weight loss is your only goal.

UltimateRBF wrote: »

CharonCharon wrote: »

I love things like barley, wheat bran cereal, brown rice, bulgur wheat, etc.
I saw a show on PBS saying that wheat was bad for my weight loss?
What? Really?
Why?
How can something that makes me feel so nice and full and makes me happy in the bathroom be making fouling up my weight loss?

It's not. Unless you have celiac disease or an allergy to wheat, it's not bad.

I second this. I have coeliacs. Why cut out a food group if you do not have to? Taking gluten out of your diet is a lot harder then you think.

Appreciate some of the comments on this board. I just started reading the book "wheat belly" based off of a recommendation from a friend I know that lost 100 lbs. i like what Pinnacle had to say about moderation, that is the approach that has worked for me in the past as well.

I found it difficult to lose weight when all I did was eat food that had wheat in it...I would always bloat afterwards, I looked like I was 6 months pregnant.

Pinnacle_IAO wrote: »

I cut back on wheat products and thought myself "low carb" only to realize I was still eating 50% carbs.
Most are from rice, veggies and fruits, but I still eat wheat produced foods.

In my fat times, I just went carb crazy, but with moderation, I had no real issues.

Carb crazy sounds like my experience leading up to my heaviest weight.

In those days I might eat a healthy balanced dinner but for the rest of the day I finally realized I was reaching for carbs, carbs, carbs (easy and quick) and most of those carbs were wheat or grain based carbs, and of items I was clearly over indulging on, those were almost always grain carbs. It would not surprise me if I was getting 75% or more of my calories from carbs, largely from low nutritional value wheat or other grain carbs. Breakfast, lunch, and snacks were largely carb rich.

Today I take time to make better breakfast and lunches no matter how busy my day is, and I don't reach for grain rich carbs for snacks. Rather arbitrarily I picked a 35% goal for my carb macro but don't worry at all if I go over - the target is there primarily to keep me mindful. It's not just total % of carbs but sources that matter. If I'm over, even way over, and the dominant source is from fruits and veges in my day, I don't feel the need to worry about it.

Some love to say that calories are all that matter - "go ahead and eat a loaf of bread if you've got 'room' in your calorie budget" - but that's a facile response which doesn't take into account myriad other health factors and individual tolerance and responses.

Non-celiac gluten intolerance is an observed reality in a larger percentage of the population than is known to suffer from celiac disease, but the physiological nature of the intolerance isn't the same and isn't well understood.
Inflammatory effects of grain rich diets, particularly diets high in highly processed grain, is a well documented phenomenon. Grain based foods with higher glycemic index are known to affect insulin sensitivity and that can have an impact on one's weight.

The reality is different people react, surprise, differently to what's in their food stream.

I went wheat free for awhile (because of Symptoms A, B and C) but started putting it back into my diet. I realized I still had Symptoms A, B and C while being gluten free, but to a much less scale. After slowly starting to introduce it back into my diet, the symptoms came with a vengeance. I tried, but I'm going to cut it out again. The symptoms were manageable when I was wheat free, and I think with a little exercise added in there they will be totally fine. I can't even think about exercising right now because I'm so lethargic/tired/exhausted.