BMI to body fat %
Options
Replies
-
so I just came across this formula which seems to line up with the % from my scale for body fat %.
Just wondering if it's accurate for others.
Anyone mind calculating this and posting the result, along with what you think your body fat % actually is.
Formula is
1.2xbmi + 0.23xage -5.4 for female and -16.2 for males.
See my scales and this formula are 1.4% different.
Just curious as to the accuracy of this formula.
I might post a image of me working out as a reward :P
How does that take account of musculature which is a pre-requisite for understanding BF isn't it?
It doesn't, other than some generalized sex-based assumptions built into the equation (the -5.4 for women and the -16.2 for dudes).
Where did you get this formula, @Mercavar?0 -
dondotwinks wrote: »I got 38.8% my scales this morning gave me 39.3%. Pretty damn close
So one bad reading matches another bad reading ?0 -
-
Should work (on average, like the bmi) for most people in the middle of the bell curve0
-
-
Formula gives me 27%. My scale gave me 15% every morning this week.0
-
HazelTrisEverdeen wrote: »This gives me 20.61%. My scale gives me around 17%. I think I should go have my body fat % checked at the doctor's next time just so I actually know.
Dexa scan is your best bet0 -
It gives me 40% which is what my BF % was when I weighet 35kg heavier. My current BF% (measured with a calipur) is 22%.0
-
so I just came across this formula which seems to line up with the % from my scale for body fat %.
Just wondering if it's accurate for others.
Anyone mind calculating this and posting the result, along with what you think your body fat % actually is.
Formula is
1.2xbmi + 0.23xage -5.4 for female and -16.2 for males.
See my scales and this formula are 1.4% different.
Just curious as to the accuracy of this formula.
I might post a image of me working out as a reward :P
How does that take account of musculature which is a pre-requisite for understanding BF isn't it?
It doesn't, other than some generalized sex-based assumptions built into the equation (the -5.4 for women and the -16.2 for dudes).
Where did you get this formula, @Mercavar?
A few places, I just googled something like Body fat from BMI. Im not claiming its awesome or for everyone etc. Just it seemed accurate for me and another person so I was curious about others. Its based on the BMI so its going to be inaccurate for some just like the BMI.
http://halls.md/body-fat-percentage-formula/
http://www.livestrong.com/article/173592-how-to-convert-bmi-to-body-fat-percentage/
http://www.caloriecount.com/forums/weight-loss/way-calculate-body-fat-percentage-bmi0 -
These things are typically correlations between measured variables in a sample population. You end up with a cloud of dots and a line passing through the middle. Many dots are a way off the line. Typically the correlation coefficient is <0.7 which implies 30% of the variations are not taken care of by the equation.
They serve a purpose if you only know your height, weight and age but are no substitute for decent measurement.0 -
Doesn't seem to work too well for me - older but fit with more muscle than most old farts my age (55).
Gives me 26%
My "guesstimate" is around 15% but haven't tested my BF for a quite a while.0 -
Your formula 35.25%
Cheap scale 31.8%
Average of tapings 29.5%0 -
Formula - 39.316 BF%
Dexa scan done in Feb 2015 - 50.9 BF%
Though I've lost 10# since the scan, pretty confident I didn't lose 11% in body fat.0 -
The calculator gave me 31.19%, Body fat measured last night at one of those stand on scales at the gym came to 31.1%.. I'll take that.0
-
I'm thinking this formula is assuming that, something like, a female at a BMI of 18=18%BF and a female at a BMI of 30=40%BF and it's just applying a conversion formula to reach those assumed BF% at those BMIs. **numbers are pulled out of my head** and then adding a little cojigger to assume older people have a higher BF%0
-
The formula gives me 31.35%. Based on DEXA I'm around 25%. I'm another person who is older (45), and tries to stay fit, although I wouldn't have said I have that much muscle. I do have enough (according to DEXA) that I'd have too low bf at the bottom of the BMI range for my height, though. (I think I'll be happy at 20.5-21, am 22 now, so I'd also have said I'm a person the BMI range works great for.)0
-
The formula is largely dependent on BMI being accurate. Which for anybody with muscle it is not.
Formula = 28.74%
Actual 15-18%0 -
Well, if the formula includes BMI, it's fundamentally flawed from the start.0
-
Whoa! No, that wasn't even close for me. Maybe because I'm old and have quite a bit of muscle, but it was over 10% high. And I've had my BF% measured by DEXA scan.0
-
rjmudlax13 wrote: »Well, if the formula includes BMI, it's fundamentally flawed from the start.
Yup.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.1K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.9K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.4K Fitness and Exercise
- 403 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions