What on earth: Liquid measurements for grapes

Options
DoingTheNeedful
DoingTheNeedful Posts: 23 Member
edited October 2015 in Food and Nutrition
The way I see it, you can either count grapes or weigh them. Logical, yeah?

So why on earth do all the "verified" entries for frigging grapes give liquid measurements? What am I going to do, pulp them and drink it?

aaa3vy76v5di.png

Replies

  • elephant2mouse
    elephant2mouse Posts: 906 Member
    Options
    If you're not drinking your grapes, you're doing it wrong. ;)
  • Ang108
    Ang108 Posts: 1,711 Member
    Options
    I think that it is ( outside of communities like MFP ) the " american " way.
    I always have been surprised that so many recipes have measurements like " 3 cups of Brussels sprouts "in them. In the last 10-15 years it has become more popular to also use ounces, but the cup measurement is part of the US culinary culture that will be difficult to change.
    At least this is my opinion and one of a non-American not even living in the country.
  • CyberTone
    CyberTone Posts: 7,337 Member
    Options
    I think this was the not-so-intended result of MFP's idea to convert serving sizes automatically from cups to milliliters when a user creates a food item, regardless whether the conversion passes the "common sense" test. In your example, I guess the package of grapes provided nutrition information in a measurement of cups, most likely with grams in parentheses; however, the user that created the entry used only the 1 cup serving size and that measurement got converted to milliliters automatically by the software algorithm.
    Breaking News :) We are in the process of rolling out a major update to our serving size behavior in our Android, iOS and Web apps. This update will allow automatic conversion between units of measure. For example, foods created in ounces will be measurable in grams, and foods created in cups will be measurable in liters). We will update the article below when the rollout of this feature is complete.
    Reference:
    https://myfitnesspal.desk.com/customer/en/portal/articles/300068-the-serving-size-i-need-to-log-is-not-available-
  • DoingTheNeedful
    DoingTheNeedful Posts: 23 Member
    Options
    Huh. Okay, well, that makes sense CyberTone. The real question is, apart from contributing to bloat and fragmentation of items by creating my own "grapes" item, how might I go about fixing it?
  • Thowe92
    Thowe92 Posts: 109 Member
    Options
    I think MFP is saying to drink more wine.
  • tincanonastring
    tincanonastring Posts: 3,944 Member
    Options
    Don't use the Kroger - Grapes entry. Search "Grapes, raw" and one of the choices will have gram measurements. The best way to search whole food database entries is to use the exact listing as the USDA nutrition database.

    http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list
  • DoingTheNeedful
    DoingTheNeedful Posts: 23 Member
    Options
    Yeah, tracking down the USDA entry I want is hit or miss. Sometimes I can search for something-USDA and it'll hit, or not. I'll remember to try "grapes, raw" next time. Anything would be a damn sight better than searching for grapes and getting "Gatorade, grape drank" or whatever
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,372 Member
    Options
    It's because people somehow think that it's a good idea to use volume measurements for solids, so MFP automatically converts into fluid ounces now.
  • Maxematics
    Maxematics Posts: 2,287 Member
    Options
    Yeah, sometimes you really have to dig around for good entries or enter them yourself. It bothers me when I scan a barcode or search up a food in the database and see a half-assed entry tied to it. The way I see it, if someone is going to submit a food and share their submission with other MFP members, they should make sure it's as accurate as possible. I hate seeing things like "chobni grek youguert (Sam's) - vanilla" and it's fraught with spelling errors, the wrong unit(s) of measure are listed, and/or only the calories are included. For fruits and vegetables, always search "fruit/vegetable name usda"; I find those entries are the best and I often compare a few of them to make sure the calorie count is correct.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,626 Member
    Options
    I've never heard of measuring grapes as a liquid before. I don't *think* it's the American way.

    USDA entries are my personal favorites. Sometimes I have to make calorie adjustments, but they give you better info on your micros, so I use those when I can.

    It's a pain in the butt, though. I have yet to find frozen raspberries. All the other berries, I can find the frozen version, but not the rasp ones. Maybe it's my fault - it could be there and I can't find it. But it really IS tough to use.
  • MelodyandBarbells
    MelodyandBarbells Posts: 7,725 Member
    edited October 2015
    Options
    synacious wrote: »
    Yeah, sometimes you really have to dig around for good entries or enter them yourself. It bothers me when I scan a barcode or search up a food in the database and see a half-assed entry tied to it. The way I see it, if someone is going to submit a food and share their submission with other MFP members, they should make sure it's as accurate as possible. I hate seeing things like "chobni grek youguert (Sam's) - vanilla" and it's fraught with spelling errors, the wrong unit(s) of measure are listed, and/or only the calories are included. For fruits and vegetables, always search "fruit/vegetable name usda"; I find those entries are the best and I often compare a few of them to make sure the calorie count is correct.

    Since I use the app almost exclusively, I try to go back and edit crappy entries that are tied to a scanned barcode.

    FYI for anyone, the author @SezxyStef covers how to do that here. http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1
    Kalikel wrote: »
    I've never heard of measuring grapes as a liquid before. I don't *think* it's the American way.

    USDA entries are my personal favorites. Sometimes I have to make calorie adjustments, but they give you better info on your micros, so I use those when I can.

    It's a pain in the butt, though. I have yet to find frozen raspberries. All the other berries, I can find the frozen version, but not the rasp ones. Maybe it's my fault - it could be there and I can't find it. But it really IS tough to use.

    As explained in some earlier posts above, they just mean the idea of cups measurement, in general. And now MFP has a "helpful" update where they can basically click a button and add all the conversions for any verified food. So if the measurement unit entered was cups (liquids), they'll automatically add ml, fl oz, liters, etc for you. If it was in grams (solid), they'll add lbs, kg, oz, 100g, etc
  • Maxematics
    Maxematics Posts: 2,287 Member
    Options
    JaneiR36 wrote: »
    synacious wrote: »
    Yeah, sometimes you really have to dig around for good entries or enter them yourself. It bothers me when I scan a barcode or search up a food in the database and see a half-assed entry tied to it. The way I see it, if someone is going to submit a food and share their submission with other MFP members, they should make sure it's as accurate as possible. I hate seeing things like "chobni grek youguert (Sam's) - vanilla" and it's fraught with spelling errors, the wrong unit(s) of measure are listed, and/or only the calories are included. For fruits and vegetables, always search "fruit/vegetable name usda"; I find those entries are the best and I often compare a few of them to make sure the calorie count is correct.

    Since I use the app almost exclusively, I try to go back and edit crappy entries that are tied to a scanned barcode.

    Same! I'm glad they have the "Find a better match" option because 80% of the time I have to do that or make my own entry.
  • sinbadfxdl
    sinbadfxdl Posts: 103 Member
    Options
    Experiment. Liquify how many it would take. ;)
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,013 Member
    Options
    I have found this in many "verified" entries, solid foods with only liquid measures available. I actually avoid the verified entries at this point, they just aggravate me.
  • flaminica
    flaminica Posts: 304 Member
    Options
    DoingTheNeedful wrote: »
    So why on earth do all the "verified" entries for frigging grapes give liquid measurements? What am I going to do, pulp them and drink it?

    aaa3vy76v5di.png

    If it helps, millilitres and grams are freely convertable: 1ml = 1g. So 237ml is 237g.

    The "verified" entries are riddled with errors. When in doubt, search multiple entries on MFP or double-check against other calorie databases altogether. MFP's database is huge, but the noise-to-signal ratio is so high that it's frequently unreliable.
  • tincanonastring
    tincanonastring Posts: 3,944 Member
    edited October 2015
    Options
    You can always just make your own for each new food you want to add and just use the "My Foods" section. I wouldn't worry about cluttering up the system. If MFP was worried about database accuracy, they'd actually pay someone to manage it responsibly and you wouldn't see ridiculous measurements/entries like that. They'd probably actually prefer database bloat so they can hype the size.
  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 9,979 Member
    Options
    flaminica wrote: »
    DoingTheNeedful wrote: »
    So why on earth do all the "verified" entries for frigging grapes give liquid measurements? What am I going to do, pulp them and drink it?

    aaa3vy76v5di.png

    If it helps, millilitres and grams are freely convertable: 1ml = 1g. So 237ml is 237g.

    The "verified" entries are riddled with errors. When in doubt, search multiple entries on MFP or double-check against other calorie databases altogether. MFP's database is huge, but the noise-to-signal ratio is so high that it's frequently unreliable.

    That's only true for water or substances with the same density as water. 237 ml of water is 237 g. 250 ml of grapes are only 157 g (at least for the variety of grapes I have on hand, an oblong variety called moondrop).
  • flaminica
    flaminica Posts: 304 Member
    Options
    lynn_glenmont wrote: »

    That's only true for water or substances with the same density as water. 237 ml of water is 237 g. 250 ml of grapes are only 157 g (at least for the variety of grapes I have on hand, an oblong variety called moondrop).

    Thanks for the clarification.

  • vegan4lyfe2012
    vegan4lyfe2012 Posts: 1,135 Member
    Options
    DoingTheNeedful wrote: »
    Yeah, tracking down the USDA entry I want is hit or miss. Sometimes I can search for something-USDA and it'll hit, or not. I'll remember to try "grapes, raw" next time. Anything would be a damn sight better than searching for grapes and getting "Gatorade, grape drank" or whatever

    "grape drank" LOL...Love! Thanks for making me chuckle!
  • CooCooPuff
    CooCooPuff Posts: 4,374 Member
    Options
    kimny72 wrote: »
    I have found this in many "verified" entries, solid foods with only liquid measures available. I actually avoid the verified entries at this point, they just aggravate me.
    I'm usually fine with whole foods. It's with packaged foods that I have this problem. I was looking for an entry for some cookies recently and found ml. Mmmmm, liquid cookies.

Categories