Weights or Cardio better to lose 150 lbs?
watkins1980
Posts: 14 Member
I have about 150 lbs to lose to reach my goal. I am confused as to which is better, weights via strength training, or cardio? I read doing weights will keep your body burning calories up to 36 hours after you're done with your workout, and cardio will only burn up until you stop your workout. I prefer weights, but am seeking to find the best path. Thanks!
Mike
Mike
0
Replies
-
I am not much help but I would say do both. Strength training and cardio each have their own benefits.0
-
Calorie deficit for weight loss. Cardio for heart and lung health, though it can help with the deficit. Weights for strengthening and maintaining muscle mass.0
-
Another vote for both. (But do ease into it so you don't hurt yourself.)0
-
Do what you like best for now. Any activity is good activity, and when you're just starting out with an exercise regimen you don't have to go all-out. Try out different things- spinning, yoga, elliptical, racquetball, cycling, jumping rope, basketball, running, rollerblading, etc. The world is your oyster and exercise should be fun!
The point I'm trying to make is that exercise shouldn't be a means to an end or "so I can lose X amount of weight" sort of thing-- it should be something you do for life because you enjoy it.0 -
I'd say both too but if you really hate one or the other just start with the one you like. You can always add in other things later.0
-
-
watkins1980 wrote: »I have about 150 lbs to lose to reach my goal. I am confused as to which is better, weights via strength training, or cardio? I read doing weights will keep your body burning calories up to 36 hours after you're done with your workout, and cardio will only burn up until you stop your workout. I prefer weights, but am seeking to find the best path. Thanks!
Mike
The "afterburn" claims for weight training are highly overstated -- it doesn't make a difference if you are "burning more calories for 36 hours" if that extra burn is only 2-3 calories per minute.
That being said, it is possible to lose weight doing primarily resistance training combined with a calorie deficit. There is no "best" way--the "best" way is the one that you are most likely to consistently follow. Choosing an exercise modality because someone says it's "the best" is usually a fool's errand. The commitment needs to be internal not external.
0 -
Uh, "2-3 calories per minute" for 36 hours would be 4,320-6,480 calories. That would make a HUGE difference for most people.
(I don't think it actually DOES that, mind you.)
0 -
Calorie deficit for weight loss. Cardio for heart and lung health, though it can help with the deficit. Weights for strengthening and maintaining muscle mass.
^ Exactly this. As Azdak said, EPOC is highly overstated and worrying about it is majoring in the minors. Do whatever exercise you like best and will stick to.0 -
Cardio AND weights or other resistance training, AND calorie deficit. That's all I've needed. Lost 130 so far, 21 to go.0
-
Calorie deficit and weight lifting. Cardio is optional.0
-
I prefer cardio to weight lifting, in fact I've found I really don't enjoy strength training at all. But I suffer through it because I don't just want to be thin, I want to be toned in all the right places and it's worth it to achieve that. So just my personal perspective. I actually enjoy cardio.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions