Runners: how do you balance high mileage and hunger and weight loss?
Sailor_Moon86
Posts: 48 Member
I keep eating at maintenance, sometimes a little over, and I'm frustrated because I want to lose these last 10 lbs ASAP. I hover between 135-139. I run 37-40 miles a week, and I was aiming for 1500 a day but end up at 1670 or so. Because I'm starving all the time. STARVING. I woke up hungry at 230 am today and ate a piece of a Lenny and Larry cookie with milk! Was sad because I had to log it for today lol. I'm a 5'3.5 female. Started at 173 April 2015. Want to get down to 120-125 range. 34/27/36 measurements.
0
Replies
-
Eta: I also strength train 3x a week for 40 minutes each.0
-
To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..0
-
Sometimes it's not how much we're eating, but what we're eating. Your diary is closed, but have you already ensure you're getting enough protein and fiber?0
-
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
0 -
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.0 -
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
0 -
Maybe it's water weight? I know I've lost inches. Clothes fit better. Even if I was off by half, 2000 caloric deficit should produce at least half a pound of Loss.0
-
I keep a small deficit. That's the only way for me to continue being a runner, lose weight, and not murder everyone from the hangries.
I'm losing 0.5 lb a week, but it's progress. I could lose faster, but I would have to be less active and that's not the lifestyle that I want to develop.0 -
Hard to say whats happening, my guess is that you aren't burning as many calories as you think. I feel like running is just eating away my muscle mass though. Maybe try just eating back half your exercise calories, FWIW I have found it incredibly hard to run and eat at a deficit....0
-
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.0 -
You might have to make better choices regarding your protein, fiber, and fat percentages. I don't have a hunger problem when I run because 1) My need to eat gets decreased and 2) When it does increase I have more than enough calories that I would have to stuff my face to eat back. A net deficit of 4000K is just over a pound a week. Maybe you need to reset expectations about how fast you can lose and still feed your body at the right levels now that you are not 173 anymore.0
-
Do you weigh solids and measure liquids?0
-
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »Maybe it's water weight? I know I've lost inches. Clothes fit better. Even if I was off by half, 2000 caloric deficit should produce at least half a pound of Loss.
I believe so and I know I am going through the same thing. Water retention is normal to help with the healing of muscle tissue that you're tearing up with the weightlifting. I hit a plateau when I began lifting again too. If your calorie count is on point, it is water. Keep it up and you will see results.
0 -
-
janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
0 -
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
So you're counting the 35-40 miles as your light cardio 3 times a week? Or you're doing light cardio 3 times a week and then the runs on top of that and eating back 90 calories per mile run? And you haven't lost anything for three weeks?
Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an understanding of what your actual calculations are.0 -
janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
So you're counting the 35-40 miles as your light cardio 3 times a week? Or you're doing light cardio 3 times a week and then the runs on top of that and eating back 90 calories per mile run? And you haven't lost anything for three weeks?
Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an understanding of what your actual calculations are.
Lol yes sorry. I'm underestimating so I placed myself under light cardio 3x a week which equals 35-40 miles. Then I recalculate what MFP gives me down to 90 cals per mile instead of 100.
0 -
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
So you're counting the 35-40 miles as your light cardio 3 times a week? Or you're doing light cardio 3 times a week and then the runs on top of that and eating back 90 calories per mile run? And you haven't lost anything for three weeks?
Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an understanding of what your actual calculations are.
Lol yes sorry. I'm underestimating so I placed myself under light cardio 3x a week which equals 35-40 miles. Then I recalculate what MFP gives me down to 90 cals per mile instead of 100.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you generated your calorie goal based on your TDEE (which is what Scooby gives you) and are then "double-dipping" when you log your exercise calories. You only want to count the activity once. If you are including it in your initial goal and then having MFP give you more, then you're double-dipping.
MFP's method is based on taking your non-exercise activity level and then adding exercise calories back to that. You can choose that method or the TDEE method, but mixing them can cause problems. You will probably want to choose one or the other.
0 -
i eat at a calorie deficit and try to eat nutrient dense foods0
-
janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
So you're counting the 35-40 miles as your light cardio 3 times a week? Or you're doing light cardio 3 times a week and then the runs on top of that and eating back 90 calories per mile run? And you haven't lost anything for three weeks?
Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an understanding of what your actual calculations are.
Lol yes sorry. I'm underestimating so I placed myself under light cardio 3x a week which equals 35-40 miles. Then I recalculate what MFP gives me down to 90 cals per mile instead of 100.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you generated your calorie goal based on your TDEE (which is what Scooby gives you) and are then "double-dipping" when you log your exercise calories. You only want to count the activity once. If you are including it in your initial goal and then having MFP give you more, then you're double-dipping.
MFP's method is based on taking your non-exercise activity level and then adding exercise calories back to that. You can choose that method or the TDEE method, but mixing them can cause problems. You will probably want to choose one or the other.
Okay so here is what I do:
According to Scooby, my TDEE is 1670 at light cardio 3x a week.
I manually input this into MFP. So MFP is set at 1670 maintenance for me.
On average, that is what I eat. 1670. Sometimes a little more, 100 calories or so, for the past 3 weeks, since I've upped mileage. I do not eat exercise calories back. I don't even pay attention to that part of MFP. MFP is purely for logging purposes so i can keep track of what Ive eaten and not have to remember in my head. I find it useful to log my calories and to keep track of what I've burned. Thats it.
Now, if Im supposed to maintain at 1670, with light cardio 3x a week, and I end up burning nearly 4k a week, I should be losing roughly one lb or half a pound if some calculations are horridly off. Does that make sense?
FWIW, I have lost inches and fit back into my jeans that i hadn't worn in years. Im just frustrated with he scale. and I do feel kind of bloated.0 -
Personally I can't imagine running that mileage while still eating at a deficit. If your #1 goal is weight loss (not improving your running), I'd cut back on both the running (maybe to 20-25 miles/week) and the calories. Running 40 miles/week IS going to make you ravenous, no way around it, and eating at a deficient I don't see how you can properly power your long runs.0
-
Last bit is bloody hard, even for runners. Hence why I still have to track.
I have myself on a lose .5 lbs/week, sedentary. Run with garmin/HRM to get a more realistic burn than what MFP would give (1cal/kg/km is reasonable). I run 60 miles/week and eat most of those calories back but don't forget to count the gels/gatorade/cliffs/whatever consumed on the runs. And I try and eat within an hour or so of getting back vs letting myself get to that super-hungry point. You can't do the last 10 with super huge 1-2lbs a week. Even .5 lbs is a bit too aggressive.0 -
How can your level of exercise be classified as light cardio?
There is something very wrong with all your numbers.
Sorry, but you should ask lots of questions now, risk looking a bit lost, and start again.0 -
Hmm, 10lbs isn't an awful lot to lose so maybe the rate of loss will slow down anyway. Did u say u started at 173 so you've lost a good 40 lbs. I know you're only 5ft 2 but to me it sounds like you are very active running up to 40ish miles per week AND doing 3 strength sessions. I'd think you'd need to be eating a little more. U can't always trust these calculators and sometimes you have to go by trial and error. Maybe going your body a boost and eating 1800 cals or something like that for a week or 2 and seeing how that goes and then dropping down again. Just to recharge yourself and give your body and your brain a break. It works for me
0 -
It's easy to overestimate calories burned from high mileage, because the calculators usually don't take into account the amount you'd burn anyway (and also some people just naturally burn less calories otherwise on a long run day). I tend to assume calories are right on for shorter runs, but cut them back substantially for longer runs.
Also, at under 150 you burn less than 100 cal/mile even for shorter runs. (I started running again at 200 and am now 125, and it's so sad how many fewer calories I burn for the same distances -- at least it takes less time, I guess.)
Don't know if any of that helps, as I haven't run your numbers (although I agree you ought to be losing if you are eating 1670 consistently with that exercise), and you might want to have someone look at the logging -- the entries in MFP can be inaccurate if you haven't yet gotten the hang of the database.0 -
FWIW I would say to set your activity at sedentary and track your exercise. Then eat half of the calories back to see where that puts you. Something seems wrong with your calculations and possible double dipping here...0
-
I'll be more helpful than my last post.
Calculate your maintenance calories WITHOUT exercise. Scooby's calc at sedentary is really good for this.
Calculate your running figures by using a heart rate monitor.
Each day calculate your TDEE, depending if it's a rest day. Then you will be fuelling properly for your longer runs.
Take 250 calories off, and hope for a half a pound weight loss per week.
Ideally you should stop exercising and find your true maintenance figure, but you will drop a lot of glycogen and water weight and get even more confused.
It took me some trial and error to work out my burns and maintenance but it was worth it,
Running fast is 600 cals per hour, cycling about 4/500 strength training is impossible to work out so I just use about 200 per hour but I work super hard and heavy with short breaks.
I'm 129lb so your burns will be different.0 -
Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
A deficit from the calories burned running. I think I should be losing weight at a much faster pace. Just not sure how to not be so god damn ravenous all the time.janejellyroll wrote: »Sailor_Moon86 wrote: »
I have a deficit of nearly 4K a week from running.peaceout_aly wrote: »To lose you have to have a deficit, so eating at or above maintenance would be the reason you aren't losing..
I'm confused then because your OP says you are eating at maintenance.
If you're in a deficit, you should be losing weight.
Do you know what your actual deficit is? Not what you're burning total from running, but the difference between what you're consuming total and what you're burning total?
That is what determines how quickly you will lose and whether or not you're actually "eating at maintenance" or are in a deficit.
Well for the past 3 weeks I've been averaging an intake of about 1670-1700. Which is maintenance for me according to Scooby. For someone who does light cardio 3x a week. Then I run 35-40 miles and even then, I recalculate what MFP says. It says I burn 100 calories per mile but I take it down to 90. But idk. Maybe I'm underestimating calories because I'm so ravenous all the time and I get careless? But even then, even if I was off by 2000, half a pound should come off lol. But I'm guessing it may be water weight. I just increased mileage a month ago from 25-30 miles to 35/40.
So you're counting the 35-40 miles as your light cardio 3 times a week? Or you're doing light cardio 3 times a week and then the runs on top of that and eating back 90 calories per mile run? And you haven't lost anything for three weeks?
Sorry for all the questions, I'm just trying to get an understanding of what your actual calculations are.
Lol yes sorry. I'm underestimating so I placed myself under light cardio 3x a week which equals 35-40 miles. Then I recalculate what MFP gives me down to 90 cals per mile instead of 100.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you generated your calorie goal based on your TDEE (which is what Scooby gives you) and are then "double-dipping" when you log your exercise calories. You only want to count the activity once. If you are including it in your initial goal and then having MFP give you more, then you're double-dipping.
MFP's method is based on taking your non-exercise activity level and then adding exercise calories back to that. You can choose that method or the TDEE method, but mixing them can cause problems. You will probably want to choose one or the other.
Okay so here is what I do:
According to Scooby, my TDEE is 1670 at light cardio 3x a week.
I manually input this into MFP. So MFP is set at 1670 maintenance for me.
On average, that is what I eat. 1670. Sometimes a little more, 100 calories or so, for the past 3 weeks, since I've upped mileage. I do not eat exercise calories back. I don't even pay attention to that part of MFP. MFP is purely for logging purposes so i can keep track of what Ive eaten and not have to remember in my head. I find it useful to log my calories and to keep track of what I've burned. Thats it.
Now, if Im supposed to maintain at 1670, with light cardio 3x a week, and I end up burning nearly 4k a week, I should be losing roughly one lb or half a pound if some calculations are horridly off. Does that make sense?
FWIW, I have lost inches and fit back into my jeans that i hadn't worn in years. Im just frustrated with he scale. and I do feel kind of bloated.
Got it. Sorry for being slow, thank you for breaking it down for me.
Are you confident in your logging? Many times when people aren't losing when they expect it, it's because of an issue with their logging. Are you using a food scale for all solid food (including pre-packaged stuff)? Are you avoiding generic entries?0 -
Am I the only one seeing the 35-40 miles a week running and not matching it up with 1670 calories per day AND not losing weight.
Either the calorie counting is off or something.0 -
Springfield1970 wrote: »Am I the only one seeing the 35-40 miles a week running and not matching it up with 1670 calories per day AND not losing weight.
Either the calorie counting is off or something.
Yeah, my (tentative) guess is that this is a logging issue.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions