Muscle Mass % ??
sbl1881
Posts: 213 Member
So, I have a fancy scale that tracks weight, body fat %, water weight %, muscle mass %, bone density (I think). I know where I should be ideally for my weight and body fat, and it's nice to see when my weight fluctuates due to water, but I've never really paid attention to the muscle mass %. Is there an "ideal" range to be in? I'm 5'3, 139 and trying to get back in low-mid 120's. I do not want to lose muscle to lose weight, and do work out 4-5 times a week. My current muscle mass is showing at 35.8%. I know these things are 100% accurate, but just was curious to know what the experts out there thought.
Thanks!
Thanks!
0
Replies
-
Those kinds of scales are notoriously inaccurate. Some people say you can use them to see a trend, but even then my understanding is that it is skewed so much by water that it can vary dramatically.
My advice would be to ignore the number completely and lift heavy while eating at a moderate deficit. That way you can preserve as much of your lean body mass as you can while losing weight
ETA: You say that you're currently working out 4 days a week. Are you following any sort of a progressive heavy lifting program at the moment or focusing mainly on cardio?0 -
Thanks. I am using it for trendy only.
I mainly do cardio now. I just started the C25K program and am also in a group boxing class. I'd like to add in strength training at some point, but it will never be "heavy lifting". I'm just not interested in that.0 -
kathrynjean_ wrote: »Those kinds of scales are notoriously inaccurate. Some people say you can use them to see a trend, but even then my understanding is that it is skewed so much by water that it can vary dramatically.
My advice would be to ignore the number completely and lift heavy while eating at a moderate deficit. That way you can preserve as much of your lean body mass as you can while losing weight
ETA: You say that you're currently working out 4 days a week. Are you following any sort of a progressive heavy lifting program at the moment or focusing mainly on cardio?
Notoriously inaccurate to say the least. Good article about the accuracy (or lack thereof) of BIA devices: http://weightology.net/weightologyweekly/index.php/free-content/free-content/volume-1-issue-4-the-pitfalls-of-body-fat-measurement-parts-3-and-4-bod-pod-and-bioelectrical-impedance-bia/the-pitfalls-of-bodyfat-measurement-part-4-bioelectrical-impedance-bia/0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 398.4K Introduce Yourself
- 44.7K Getting Started
- 261K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.4K Food and Nutrition
- 47.7K Recipes
- 233K Fitness and Exercise
- 462 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.5K Motivation and Support
- 8.4K Challenges
- 1.4K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 17 News and Announcements
- 21 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.5K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions
