Best HRM for the workouts I'm Doing
raven56706
Posts: 918 Member
IM currently trying to track as accurate as i can my calories burned.
I workout 6 days a week. 4 is weight training with some cardio at the end and 2 days is just cardio. THe 2 days of cardio can be either a step machine or sprints on a track. Also i have the option of doing Insanity or Insanity 30.
Plus soon i will be doing swimming
which one works best for me?
I workout 6 days a week. 4 is weight training with some cardio at the end and 2 days is just cardio. THe 2 days of cardio can be either a step machine or sprints on a track. Also i have the option of doing Insanity or Insanity 30.
Plus soon i will be doing swimming
which one works best for me?
0
Replies
-
None of the above......HRMs are only intended to give some semblance of accuracy in respect to calories expended during steady state cardio (ok, so the step machine might be ok) the truth is that HRMs are intended to track heart rate and many of them, especially the less sophisticated ones, have algorithms that incorrectly correlate heart rate to energy expenditure.
If you were running & cycling I'd probably suggest something GPS based as they can also track pace, distance, elevation gains etc but a HRM alone for energy expenditure, I'd probably save my money.0 -
bump/// anyone else feel the same way>0
-
As mentioned above, an HRM is only useful during steady-state cardio such as running, cycling, etc. You could also use it during swimming if you wanted to spend the extra money for a waterproof one. In that case, both the HRM chest strap AND the watch would need to be waterproof. I'm a fan of Garmin personally but I believe their waterproof one is around $600 which is too rich for my blood.
For weight lifting an HRM is not useful.0 -
I have a GPS watch for triathlons.. but I use it as my HRM at the gym as well. My Garmin 910xt will not work with HRM during a swim, although I believe the newer version may.
I do "bootcamp" classes.. so a mixture of strength and indoor cardio. I like to have some idea of how hard I am/could be working.. but I never use it to eat back my calories. I always use it when I run and bike per above poster.
I really like my Garmin.. but it probably is a little more sophisticated than what you're looking for.0 -
how about for Insanity which is kind of HIIT workouts? wouldnt this be useful?0
-
raven56706 wrote: »how about for Insanity which is kind of HIIT workouts? wouldnt this be useful?
Hiit isn't steady state cardio, so nope.
What many people do is forget the whole logging this workout & logging that workout. But instead use a calorie calculator that includes exercise up front. A TDEE calculator has you put in a range of workout times. Then averages everything out across your week. http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/
Exercise is for fitness. Calorie burns are not even the most important thing.
0 -
raven56706 wrote: »how about for Insanity which is kind of HIIT workouts? wouldnt this be useful?
Nope.0 -
Remember, HRMs are training tools. Not calorie counters. They may spit out calorie burn estimates but that isn't really their purpose.0
-
raven56706 wrote: »how about for Insanity which is kind of HIIT workouts? wouldnt this be useful?
Still no...0 -
I use a Polar H7 for cardio. I also use it for walking paired with my phone for GPS. I continue to use it for body-weight training but I always figure it's a 30% overestimation for non-steady state cardio. Even with HIIT training on the elliptical it's fine, as long as I am not planning on eating back all of my calories. I compare what my app reads using the Polar vs what the machine reads out without using heart rate for calculation. Doing it this way I've been very happy with results and have consistently dropped weight over the last year. However, if you're intending on taking long rest breaks while lifting, etc. I wouldn't use it, or at the very least figure its overestimation to be much higher than 30%. When I am lifting/body-weight training I really don't give myself much rest in-between sets, I simply switch muscle groups to keep my heart rate up. But then again, I only do body-weight training most of the time. So for me the H7 is a perfect fit.
When you're using an HRM paired with an app that uses heart rate in its calculations you're doing just that.. you're using your heart rate as a factor in calculating calories burned. For steady cardio it makes it much more accurate. For sports, lifting, or non-steady state exercise it's not all that accurate. It will over estimate because your heart rate may stay higher while resting but you may not be exerting energy. Still though, if your heart rate is high enough, you're still burning calories. As long as you keep all that in mind, and compare your calculations with the HRM to estimations without an HRM you should be able to come up with a number that is accurate enough for your own use anyway.
FYI: The Polar H7 would not be suitable for swimming. Polar may make one for that but nothing that reads electrical activity through the skin will be accurate in water.
Just my .020
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions