Calories burnt - which is the best method of calculating?
stephiehampshire
Posts: 160
Hiya,
I guess the answer is obvious but I wanted to check,
I cycle to work every day and its between 9-10 miles each way depending on the route,
The route is not on flat ground there are hills to climb and some of it is against the wind along the seafront,
Today I put my time and speed on MFP and it came out as burning 395 calories
I also use a GPS tracker and exercise pal on my BB, that said I had done 309 calories
I also use a heart rate monitor, this said I had burnt 589 calories, it said I was in the fat burning zone for 55minutes
I guess the most accurate is my heart rate monitor as it is the one thing that monitors how hard I am working, but it is such a drastic difference I wanted to run it by you guys first!
Today was an extra hard day as it is incredably windy and I was against the wind uphill most of the way in
Thanks Guys
I guess the answer is obvious but I wanted to check,
I cycle to work every day and its between 9-10 miles each way depending on the route,
The route is not on flat ground there are hills to climb and some of it is against the wind along the seafront,
Today I put my time and speed on MFP and it came out as burning 395 calories
I also use a GPS tracker and exercise pal on my BB, that said I had done 309 calories
I also use a heart rate monitor, this said I had burnt 589 calories, it said I was in the fat burning zone for 55minutes
I guess the most accurate is my heart rate monitor as it is the one thing that monitors how hard I am working, but it is such a drastic difference I wanted to run it by you guys first!
Today was an extra hard day as it is incredably windy and I was against the wind uphill most of the way in
Thanks Guys
0
Replies
-
personally i would trust your HRM, like u say its the only 1 that actually marks how hard u worked (with the wind, hills etc) so even though it seems a lot higher than mfp, mfp will only be calculating it on a flat surface im guessing
x0 -
I was told by my trainer that it would be your HRM. I have a Forerunner that i use for running and its usually 200-300 calories off from my HRM. those GPS only goes by your settings(height, wgt, age) and how fast youre going, whereas the HRM is calculating not only your stats, but your actual heart rate in the fat burning and fitness zones, if that makes sense0
-
thanks guy I thought as much but because of the big difference I didnt want to just assume and take those extra 200 calories burnt for granted if that makes sense lol
Going for my normal walk at lunch time today, I normally estimate burning around 180 calories as we do about 2.2 miles, be interesting to do it with the HRM,
I only found my HRM this morning had to update the stats on it, depressing enough last time I used it I was 5lb lighter! I will get there again!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions