Calories
Options
shellebellesr319
Posts: 4 Member
How do i count the calories on steak do i do it on the weight raw or cooked , a raw steak i just cooked was 143g but when cooked weighed 85g . I know it might be a stupid question but its a big difference in cals
0
Replies
-
Is the info you are looking at listing it as cooked or raw? I generally figure it by cooked weight for proteins, because that is how it's going into my body. Something like oatmeal I'll do by dry weight, since that is how it is intended to be listed by manufacturer.0
-
You can log it either way, just make sure you find steak cooked or raw in the database.0
-
The information on your nutrition label is usually for the raw weight (unless the label specifies otherwise). If you need/want to weigh it after cooking, that's fine. Just be sure you're choosing an accurate and appropriate entry from the database that specifies it's for the cooked weight (ie you wouldn't use a grilled entry if you boiled it, etc)1
-
It just says cals per 100g , i usually do weigh cereal and other thing before cookin but stuck on this because the calorie difference is huge . Thanks for replying0
-
diannethegeek wrote: »The information on your nutrition label is usually for the raw weight (unless the label specifies otherwise). If you need/want to weigh it after cooking, that's fine. Just be sure you're choosing an accurate and appropriate entry from the database that specifies it's for the cooked weight (ie you wouldn't use a grilled entry if you boiled it, etc)
The cals of the steak raw was 283 but the cals of the the cooked steak went down to 168 so im confused , its my first time askin a question so i might *kitten* it up lol0 -
shellebellesr319 wrote: »diannethegeek wrote: »The information on your nutrition label is usually for the raw weight (unless the label specifies otherwise). If you need/want to weigh it after cooking, that's fine. Just be sure you're choosing an accurate and appropriate entry from the database that specifies it's for the cooked weight (ie you wouldn't use a grilled entry if you boiled it, etc)
The cals of the steak raw was 283 but the cals of the the cooked steak went down to 168 so im confused , its my first time askin a question so i might *kitten* it up lol
Weigh raw unless an entry is specifically marked as cooked. USDA entries are the most accurate. The cut matters a lot. A ribeye is very high in calories, for instance, compared to leaner cuts.0 -
shellebellesr319 wrote: »diannethegeek wrote: »The information on your nutrition label is usually for the raw weight (unless the label specifies otherwise). If you need/want to weigh it after cooking, that's fine. Just be sure you're choosing an accurate and appropriate entry from the database that specifies it's for the cooked weight (ie you wouldn't use a grilled entry if you boiled it, etc)
The cals of the steak raw was 283 but the cals of the the cooked steak went down to 168 so im confused , its my first time askin a question so i might *kitten* it up lol
The difference in weight is mostly contributed to the loss of water during cooking, which would not change the calorie count. Logging raw is the best way to go.1 -
Ok thanks everyone0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 401 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 992 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions