What is your % calorific deficit?

Options
So we know that MFP will take your BMR and apply an activity level multiplier to estimate your Total Daily Energy Expenditure and then from there will reduce the daily calorie limit by 500 for 1lb loss or 1000 for 2lb loss.

The issue with this is that too large of a deficit can mean that weight lost is not actual fat loss but lean body mass (LBM) which will lower your BMR. This can lead to yo-yo dieting as it effectively reduces the amount of calories you can eat without gaining weight.

A good recommendation to ensure that the weight you lose is fat and not LBM is to reduce your calorie intake by 20% from your TDEE and also ensure that you don't lose more than 2lbs per week. (Although it is possible to lose more than this and the majority being fat for very obese people, it is a rare occurence)

So how do you work out your calorific deficit in %?

Go to Tools - BMR. Get this number and multyply it by the following depending on your activity level.

1.2 = Sedentary (Little or no exercise and desk job)
1.3-1.4 = Lightly Active (Little daily activity & light exercise 1-3 days a week)
1.5-1.6 = Moderately Active (Moderately active daily life & Moderate exercise 3-5 days a week)
1.7-1.8 = Very Active (Physically demanding lifestyle & Hard exercise or sports 6-7 days a week)
1.9-2.0 = Extremely Active (Hard daily exercise or sports and physical job)

Example: me at 5'8" and 172lbs, my BMR is 1744. Multiply by 1.4 (desk job with exercise 5 days a week) equals 2442 cals.

Now take your daily calorie limit and divide it by your TDEE. My example: 1-(2000/2442) = 18% calorie deficit.

As you get leaner, the % deficit you can use to lose weight but not LBM is reduced so it is a good thing to check on through your weight loss journey.

So if you want post up:
Male or Female:
Approximate BF%:
Calorie Deficit %:

Male
12% BF
18% deficit
«1

Replies

  • kellyscomeback
    kellyscomeback Posts: 1,369 Member
    Options
    Female
    19% deficit though I'm Sedentary and work out 5-6 days a week
    45% BF per my scale
  • Pcramer2
    Pcramer2 Posts: 16
    Options
    Great Post!!

    Not sure if I am doing this right though.... Height: 5'. Weight: 133 pounds. BMR: 1144. TDEE: 1601 (@1.4) BF% 26.11

    Yeah, it sucks being so little....lol My TDEE might be a bit higher since I am doing intense exercise 6 days a week (Turbo Fire)

    Not sure how to figure the deficit ??
  • ChRiStA_1983
    ChRiStA_1983 Posts: 380 Member
    Options
    Gender: Female
    Height: 5'9"
    Weight: 130.4 lbs.

    Not sure of my Body Fat %, but my BMR = 1,386. Multiplied by 1.3 (A LITTLE activity, but working out 5-6 days per week) = 1,801.8

    Daily Caloric Allowance = 1,532 (Therefore 1-(1,532/1801.8) = 0.15).

    My Daily Caloric Deficit is at 15%.
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Options
    Great Post!!

    Not sure if I am doing this right though.... Height: 5'. Weight: 133 pounds. BMR: 1144. TDEE: 1601 (@1.4) BF% 26.11

    Yeah, it sucks being so little....lol My TDEE might be a bit higher since I am doing intense exercise 6 days a week (Turbo Fire)

    Not sure how to figure the deficit ??

    1- (your daily calorie goal/TDEE)x100 to get it in % :)

    So if you are at 1200 it would be 25%.
  • Pcramer2
    Pcramer2 Posts: 16
    Options
    Great Post!!

    Not sure if I am doing this right though.... Height: 5'. Weight: 133 pounds. BMR: 1144. TDEE: 1601 (@1.4) BF% 26.11

    Yeah, it sucks being so little....lol My TDEE might be a bit higher since I am doing intense exercise 6 days a week (Turbo Fire)

    Not sure how to figure the deficit ??

    1- (your daily calorie goal/TDEE)x100 to get it in % :)

    So if you are at 1200 it would be 25%.

    Got it!! Thanks : )
  • Mike523
    Mike523 Posts: 393 Member
    Options
    Hey Chris,

    The numbers/descriptions you use for activity multipliers are slightly different than what I see all over the Internet. Here's what I see pretty much everywhere:

    Sedentary = BMR X 1.2 (little or no exercise, desk job)
    Lightly active = BMR X 1.375 (light exercise/sports 1-3 days/wk)
    Mod. active = BMR X 1.55 (moderate exercise/sports 3-5 days/wk)
    Very active = BMR X 1.725 (hard exercise/sports 6-7 days/wk)
    Extr. active = BMR X 1.9 (hard daily exercise/sports & physical job or 2X day training, i.e marathon, contest etc.)

    Based on these numbers I would use 1.725 as a multiplier, since although I do have a sedentary job, I do hard exercise 6 days per week. But based the descriptions on your multiplers, I'm not sure what to use, since with each level you increase daily activity AND exercise (for example, lightly active AND light exercise 1-3 days, moderately active AND moderate exercise 3-5 days, physically demanding lifestyle AND hard exercise 6-7 days).

    Any thoughts?
  • CriticalX
    CriticalX Posts: 212 Member
    Options
    so my job is very physical 10 hour day so need to go with? 1.9-2.0 = Extremely Active (Hard daily exercise or sports and physical job) ??? im 5'10 and 175 and bf 10-12% depending on time of day... so im tired someone help me lol
  • Mandakat17
    Mandakat17 Posts: 105
    Options
    bump
  • dawnemjh
    dawnemjh Posts: 1,465 Member
    Options
    So what should the percentage be?? Mine calculation comes out to (I think) 17% defecit, but 2000/2400= .83, so that would be 83 percent, so 100-83 is 17% defecit??

    So what does this mean exactly?? What should the percentage be??
  • lifeinabite
    Options
    For Pcramer2 yes not sure I am understanding exactly how to calculate this either. But I am waiting for my turbofire to start it, how do you like it? I do turbo jam about 6-7 days a week with 35 min of treadmill right now.

    Ht- 5'3"
    Wt- 129

    bmr- 1242
    level of activity is 1.6
  • fromaquasar
    fromaquasar Posts: 811 Member
    Options
    Um - ek. I am working out my Calorie deficit at 40%

    I am 5"5, 123 pounds, female, 23 so my BMR = 1320
    Times by 1.5 (I work a desk job but do at least 5 cardio workouts a week)

    = 1980

    1-(1200/1980) x 100 = 40%

    Even dropping a level to a 1.4 multiplier has me at 36%

    So have I made a mistake or do I massively need to up my calories!
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Options
    Mike523: interesting. These activity multipliers are the ones from bodybuilding.com. You could use other ones as at the end of the day TDEE is going to be an estimate only.

    Criticalx: yep, sounds right. So take BMR x 1.9 = TDEE. Then use that number to workout your deficit.

    dawnemjh: Yep, that's right. There is no correct % as such (especially because TDEE is an estimate as I said) but say for example a guy was 10% bodyfat and he plugs in some figures and works out that his 2lb weight loss per week set by MFP is actually a 40% calorie deficit then this would be a good case to increase the calories a bit so that it is closer to 20%.

    The larger you are the higher deficit you can run without losing too much LBM. Resistance training and a good amount of protein will also assist in the cause. (I use minimum 1g/lb of bodyweight for protein)
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Options
    Um - ek. I am working out my Calorie deficit at 40%

    I am 5"5, 123 pounds, female, 23 so my BMR = 1320
    Times by 1.5 (I work a desk job but do at least 5 cardio workouts a week)

    = 1980

    1-(1200/1980) x 100 = 40%

    Even dropping a level to a 1.4 multiplier has me at 36%

    So have I made a mistake or do I massively need to up my calories!

    If it's working for you, stick with it (re scales, pics, measurements) but you could be one of the cases where the generic style MFP settings have you at too large of a deficit. (especially cause I know how hard you workout :smile: )
  • CriticalX
    CriticalX Posts: 212 Member
    Options
    so mfp has me set at 2750 to maintain.. but im coming up with 3375 is to maintain? so that a defict of 525... right/
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Options
    so mfp has me set at 2750 to maintain.. but im coming up with 3375 is to maintain? so that a defict of 525... right/

    That would be an 18.5% deficit.

    If you actually know your maintenance calories from previous logging history then it's better to use that number than BMR x activity factor.
  • Mike523
    Mike523 Posts: 393 Member
    Options
    So I will estimate my activity multiplier as 1.6, since I have a desk job but exercise hard 6 days per week, averaging about a 650 calorie burn every day according to my Polar FT7.

    At 41 years old, 187 lbs, and 5' 9", my BMR is 1744 according to MFP.

    1744 x 1.6 = 2790 TDEE

    I eat on average about 2300 calories per day.

    1 - (2300/2790) x 100 = 17.5% deficit

    My body fat percentage is currently about 17%
  • Mike523
    Mike523 Posts: 393 Member
    Options
    So I will estimate my activity multiplier as 1.6, since I have a desk job but exercise hard 6 days per week, averaging about a 650 calorie burn every day according to my Polar FT7.

    At 41 years old, 187 lbs, and 5' 9", my BMR is 1744 according to MFP.

    1744 x 1.6 = 2790 TDEE

    I eat on average about 2300 calories per day.

    1 - (2300/2790) x 100 = 17.5% deficit

    My body fat percentage is currently about 17%

    And I think that 1.6 multiplier is pretty close to accurate, since if I go the MFP way I get a similar TDEE:

    1744 (BMR) x 1.2 (sedentary job) + 650 (exercise) = 2742 TDEE

    Pretty close to the 2790 I got above...
  • Jennical
    Jennical Posts: 219 Member
    Options
    Bump...
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Options
    Mike523: calcs look good and looks like a good deficit :)
  • Pebble321
    Pebble321 Posts: 6,554 Member
    Options
    My TDEE: 1937, daily cals 1500, deficit = 22.5%

    I've been losing at a very steady rate (averaging 1kg every 10 days) for 5 1/2 months but I'm getting close to my goal and have been thinking that it's time to slow down the weight loss and start heading up towards maintenance calories.
    This looks like a good tool to help me get the right balance of eating more now I weigh less.
    Thanks!