Artificial sweetener junkies and diet soda drinkers read on
kenzietea
Posts: 614 Member
Replies
-
Thanks for the post. This will generate alot of discussion. It seems the evidence is building.0
-
WOW :noway: .I always thought 0 calories=good for you...I guess not. The only 0 calorie drink that is 100% healthy would be water.0
-
I think this is the key:
"It’s hard to make a blanket statement on whether or not you should drink diet soda," Brierley Wright, M.S., R.D., the nutrition editor for EatingWell Magazine, says. "At the end of the day what I think it comes down to is how are you using diet soda—is it truly a substitute for a higher calorie beverage or is it just an excuse to order the fries with your burger or a cookie for dessert? If it’s the former, go ahead. If it’s the latter, perhaps think twice."0 -
Thank you for this...I really need to cut down.
I'm a junkie myself on Coke Zero, I feel like if I give it up I will indulge in other vices and for now diet soda is the least harmful (I think).
Starting tomorrow I'm cutting back to no more than two a day...hopefully in a couple of weeks, I'll lower it to one a day.
Wish me luck!0 -
I think this is the key:
"It’s hard to make a blanket statement on whether or not you should drink diet soda," Brierley Wright, M.S., R.D., the nutrition editor for EatingWell Magazine, says. "At the end of the day what I think it comes down to is how are you using diet soda—is it truly a substitute for a higher calorie beverage or is it just an excuse to order the fries with your burger or a cookie for dessert? If it’s the former, go ahead. If it’s the latter, perhaps think twice."
I agree. for the most part. But still don't think anything non-nutritional should become a daily habit. Weekly or occasional maybe. Any chemical that your body would not find naturally in food, couldn't be that great for it0 -
Thank you for this...I really need to cut down.
I'm a junkie myself on Coke Zero, I feel like if I give it up I will indulge in other vices and for now diet soda is the least harmful (I think).
Starting tomorrow I'm cutting back to no more than two a day...hopefully in a couple of weeks, I'll lower it to one a day.
Wish me luck!
Good luck! I thank goodness it isn't an addiction for me- but my grandma drinks about 6 or 7 a day. She has full blown diabetes yet doesn't really eat much aside from diet coke... and she definitely seems to crave real sugar because of it! Cutting down slowly is definitely a good idea, you can do it!0 -
I think this is the key:
"It’s hard to make a blanket statement on whether or not you should drink diet soda," Brierley Wright, M.S., R.D., the nutrition editor for EatingWell Magazine, says. "At the end of the day what I think it comes down to is how are you using diet soda—is it truly a substitute for a higher calorie beverage or is it just an excuse to order the fries with your burger or a cookie for dessert? If it’s the former, go ahead. If it’s the latter, perhaps think twice."
I agree 100%!!!
I personally usually only have 1 can a day at most (unless I'm going out to a movie where I'll have a large diet soda so I don't binge on popcorn or candy or if I'm going for a long night out and need to be a designated driver or something) so I'm not too concerned about my current intake.0 -
I typically have one soda a day (which could be a 12 oz can to a 24 oz bottle), and one packet of Crystal Light type mix per 32 oz. of water three or four times a day.
Since I'm leaner, more fit and healthier now than I was before I switched to artificial sweeteners, I have to say that it's not making me fat.0 -
Stay away from any artificial sweeteners and diet soda! They may contain aspartame (most sugar-free things do). Aspartame has been denied by the FDA 8 times! It was finally approved but under very suspicious conditions. Aspartame has 92 different side effects including memory loss, reproductive disorders, brain lesions, Alzheimer's, etc. Aspartame contains methyl alcohol and when ingested, is converted into formaldehyde which is a neurotoxin. Other "zero-calorie sweeteners" are much more difficult for you body to break down because it is chemically altered in order to have zero calories. Because your body doesn't properly know how to break it down, it's stored in your cells and makes it much more difficult to lose weight. Bottom line....CUT OUT THE DIET SODA AND SWEETENERS. Try using Stevia, Truvia, Honey or Agave Nectar as alternative sweeteners. best of luck to everyone!0
-
I think it only makes sense to say that if something isn't natural it can't be good for you. Putting any type of chemical in your body whether it be artificial sweeteners, processed foods, or anything that isn't natural, your body wasn't made to process. We all wonder why all these diseases are more prevalent than ever and while this isn't the only culprit, it's a big one we have control over. One of the biggest advocates of an organic lifestyle is Jillian Michaels (from the biggest loser). And while it is more expensive she states that if you don't eat natural foods, your medical bills will be more expensive down the road. I personally can't afford to eat completely organic but I have switched the foods I eat the most to organic (every little bit helps!)
Hope this helps0 -
Natural and organic. Huh. Those words to used to market tobacco products, among a whole host of food products. Does that make a "natural" plant like tobacco (without additives, preservatives, etc) something you should partake in? Nope. That naturally occurring plant contains chemicals that are harmful. Then, a naturally occurring substance like sucrose, concentrated down to the point of crystallization, has become unnatural and processed.
I am not saying you should or should not consume artificial sweeteners, but much of what is presented here is simply bunk and reactionary.
Chemicals are what food is made of.... you just never get to see the compositional data.
Consider this the next time you eat an orange. "Contains 100% orange juice..." uh huh.
These are the naturally occurring chemicals in an orange....
Water, glucose, fructose, galactose, phenolic glycosides, 6-deoxyaldohexoses (fuctose and rhamnose), saccharose, galacturonans, (1-4) linked D-galactopiranuronic acid, pectin, pectinic acids, polygalacturonic acids, pectinestarase, Citric Acid, L-Malic Acid, D-Isocitric Acid, Oxalic Acid, Succinic Acid, Malonic Acid, Quinic Acid, Tartaric Acid, Adipic Acid, 2-ketogluratic Acid, praline, asparagines, aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid and arginine. oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases and lyases, isomerases and ligases, glucosilglucerides, Carotenoids, tetraterpenes, limonin, aslimonoic acid A-ring lactone, neohesperidosides, flavones (3-hydroxyflavanones, 3-dydroxyflavones, O-glycosyl, aglycones C-glycosylflavones, Anthocyanins, (hesperidin, naringin, poncirin, neoheriocitrin, neohesperidin, rhoifolin, rutin, diosmin, sinensetin, auranetin, tangeritin, hydroxyethylrutinosideres, nobiletin cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidina-3.5-diglucoside, peonidin-5-glucoside, delphinidin-3-glucoside, petunidin-3-glucoside, Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid), Pholacine, Vitamin B6, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Biotin, Pantotenic acid, Vitamin A.0 -
I typically have one soda a day (which could be a 12 oz can to a 24 oz bottle), and one packet of Crystal Light type mix per 32 oz. of water three or four times a day.
Since I'm leaner, more fit and healthier now than I was before I switched to artificial sweeteners, I have to say that it's not making me fat.
But you have no way of knowing what artificial sweeteners and other additives are doing to your insides. Well, until something disastrous happens.0 -
Natural and organic. Huh. Those words to used to market tobacco products, among a whole host of food products. Does that make a "natural" plant like tobacco (without additives, preservatives, etc) something you should partake in? Nope. That naturally occurring plant contains chemicals that are harmful. Then, a naturally occurring substance like sucrose, concentrated down to the point of crystallization, has become unnatural and processed.
I am not saying you should or should not consume artificial sweeteners, but much of what is presented here is simply bunk and reactionary.
Chemicals are what food is made of.... you just never get to see the compositional data.
Consider this the next time you eat an orange. "Contains 100% orange juice..." uh huh.
These are the naturally occurring chemicals in an orange....
Water, glucose, fructose, galactose, phenolic glycosides, 6-deoxyaldohexoses (fuctose and rhamnose), saccharose, galacturonans, (1-4) linked D-galactopiranuronic acid, pectin, pectinic acids, polygalacturonic acids, pectinestarase, Citric Acid, L-Malic Acid, D-Isocitric Acid, Oxalic Acid, Succinic Acid, Malonic Acid, Quinic Acid, Tartaric Acid, Adipic Acid, 2-ketogluratic Acid, praline, asparagines, aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid and arginine. oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases and lyases, isomerases and ligases, glucosilglucerides, Carotenoids, tetraterpenes, limonin, aslimonoic acid A-ring lactone, neohesperidosides, flavones (3-hydroxyflavanones, 3-dydroxyflavones, O-glycosyl, aglycones C-glycosylflavones, Anthocyanins, (hesperidin, naringin, poncirin, neoheriocitrin, neohesperidin, rhoifolin, rutin, diosmin, sinensetin, auranetin, tangeritin, hydroxyethylrutinosideres, nobiletin cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidina-3.5-diglucoside, peonidin-5-glucoside, delphinidin-3-glucoside, petunidin-3-glucoside, Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid), Pholacine, Vitamin B6, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Biotin, Pantotenic acid, Vitamin A.
Your argument about the orange (which you seem to post everywhere) is a straw man fallacy. Perhaps all those fancily named "chemicals" occur naturally in oranges, but the key words are OCCUR NATURALLY. . . . They are completely different from artificial chemicals, additives, preservatives, etc. created in a laboratory, or carcinogenic pesticides used on non-organic crops.0 -
I typically have one soda a day (which could be a 12 oz can to a 24 oz bottle), and one packet of Crystal Light type mix per 32 oz. of water three or four times a day.
Since I'm leaner, more fit and healthier now than I was before I switched to artificial sweeteners, I have to say that it's not making me fat.
But you have no way of knowing what artificial sweeteners and other additives are doing to your insides. Well, until something disastrous happens.
Something disastrous could happen to me at any minute. As I type, a car would easily come sailing right through this house and kill me.
I choose not to live in fear.
I also know how quickly Purina acted when some cans of Friskies killed a few cats a few years back. Massive recall and news out the wazoo about getting the bad stuff off the shelves. And that's just cat food. I don't put a lot of faith in the government or big corporations, but I'm pretty sure I'm more valuable as a tax payer, voter and consumer than I am as a dead person.0 -
I choose not to live in fear.
I also know how quickly Purina acted when some cans of Friskies killed a few cats a few years back. Massive recall and news out the wazoo about getting the bad stuff off the shelves. And that's just cat food. I don't put a lot of faith in the government or big corporations, but I'm pretty sure I'm more valuable as a tax payer, voter and consumer than I am as a dead person.
Nobody wants you to live in fear. And in fact, my lack of faith in government and corporations is one of the reasons I don't trust artificial anything in food.0 -
The only thing I trust about them is that I trust they want my money. :laugh: But because of that... they need me alive. They need us - the consumer, the voter, the tax payer - more than we need them. That's why they have such cutthroat tactics and spend so much in advertising. So while I don't believe they have my best interests at heart, ever, I don't believe they're out to kill me.0
-
The only thing I trust about them is that I trust they want my money. :laugh: But because of that... they need me alive. They need us - the consumer, the voter, the tax payer - more than we need them. That's why they have such cutthroat tactics and spend so much in advertising. So while I don't believe they have my best interests at heart, ever, I don't believe they're out to kill me.
I don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist. But don't you think there may be some truth in the thought that government and corporations don't want you to be healthy, because the more unhealthy stuff you buy the more money in their pockets and the pockets of the insurance companies?
Thanks for holding a mature discussion. Not everyone here does.0 -
I think pretty much everything is OK in moderation, once in a while, as a special treat, etc.
The real problem is that so many of us have difficulty eating our favorite foods only "in moderation, once in a while, as a special treat, etc." - so it may be best to just go "cold turkey" on things like this, which may pose a health risk.
(Mmmmm ... cold turkey .... :smokin: )0 -
The only thing I trust about them is that I trust they want my money. :laugh: But because of that... they need me alive. They need us - the consumer, the voter, the tax payer - more than we need them. That's why they have such cutthroat tactics and spend so much in advertising. So while I don't believe they have my best interests at heart, ever, I don't believe they're out to kill me.
I don't mean to sound like a conspiracy theorist. But don't you think there may be some truth in the thought that government and corporations don't want you to be healthy, because the more unhealthy stuff you buy the more money in their pockets and the pockets of the insurance companies?
Thanks for holding a mature discussion. Not everyone here does.
But the unhealthier I am, the more I cost the insurance companies and eventually the government. Insurance companies don't make money on sick people. One hospital stay will rack up more expenses than you ever paid in insurance premiums. And if I'm sick enough, I won't be able to work and will have to go on disability... not only costing the government money but also not having a taxable income.0 -
But the unhealthier I am, the more I cost the insurance companies and eventually the government. Insurance companies don't make money on sick people. One hospital stay will rack up more expenses than you ever paid in insurance premiums. And if I'm sick enough, I won't be able to work and will have to go on disability... not only costing the government money but also not having a taxable income.
Why is it, then, that the government pours enormous subsidies into corn, soy, beef, etc. but almost nothing in fresh fruits and vegetables, which no one can deny are healthy?0 -
Natural and organic. Huh. Those words to used to market tobacco products, among a whole host of food products. Does that make a "natural" plant like tobacco (without additives, preservatives, etc) something you should partake in? Nope. That naturally occurring plant contains chemicals that are harmful. Then, a naturally occurring substance like sucrose, concentrated down to the point of crystallization, has become unnatural and processed.
I am not saying you should or should not consume artificial sweeteners, but much of what is presented here is simply bunk and reactionary.
Chemicals are what food is made of.... you just never get to see the compositional data.
Consider this the next time you eat an orange. "Contains 100% orange juice..." uh huh.
These are the naturally occurring chemicals in an orange....
Water, glucose, fructose, galactose, phenolic glycosides, 6-deoxyaldohexoses (fuctose and rhamnose), saccharose, galacturonans, (1-4) linked D-galactopiranuronic acid, pectin, pectinic acids, polygalacturonic acids, pectinestarase, Citric Acid, L-Malic Acid, D-Isocitric Acid, Oxalic Acid, Succinic Acid, Malonic Acid, Quinic Acid, Tartaric Acid, Adipic Acid, 2-ketogluratic Acid, praline, asparagines, aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid and arginine. oxidoreductases, transferases, hydrolases and lyases, isomerases and ligases, glucosilglucerides, Carotenoids, tetraterpenes, limonin, aslimonoic acid A-ring lactone, neohesperidosides, flavones (3-hydroxyflavanones, 3-dydroxyflavones, O-glycosyl, aglycones C-glycosylflavones, Anthocyanins, (hesperidin, naringin, poncirin, neoheriocitrin, neohesperidin, rhoifolin, rutin, diosmin, sinensetin, auranetin, tangeritin, hydroxyethylrutinosideres, nobiletin cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidina-3.5-diglucoside, peonidin-5-glucoside, delphinidin-3-glucoside, petunidin-3-glucoside, Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid), Pholacine, Vitamin B6, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Biotin, Pantotenic acid, Vitamin A.
Your argument about the orange (which you seem to post everywhere) is a straw man fallacy. Perhaps all those fancily named "chemicals" occur naturally in oranges, but the key words are OCCUR NATURALLY. . . . They are completely different from artificial chemicals, additives, preservatives, etc. created in a laboratory, or carcinogenic pesticides used on non-organic crops.
Nicotine occurs naturally. Arsenic and cyanide occur naturally. Does it mean these are OK to consume? At what concentration and body burden?
Structurally there is no difference between what is made in a lab and what is made by a plant. That is a simple fact that is hard to ignore.
All I am trying to present is that chemicals are all around us, some we need to be careful about, others not so much.
There is no epidemiological evidence that average consumption of artificial sweeteners presents unnecessary risk... whether it is chlorinated sucrose or asparatame made from a naturally occurring amino acid.0 -
I believe that the most important factor in human physiology is blood pH levels. If you think of all the foods that aren’t healthy for us they are highly acidic, the more acidic your diet the more your body does whatever to keep it in balance. A healthy range of blood pH is 7.35 - 7.45. To demonstrate how delicate this range is, anything below 7.0 can lead to death. If the acidity is too high your body does whatever it can to maintain your blood pH within a certain range, it can store acid in bodyfat. Supposedly cancer and tumors thrive in a acidic environment. High acidity levels can lead to a ton of health problems.
I don’t know the relationship between higher insulin levels and acid. In the article it stated the study on rats, their insulin increased. My question is did they also gain weight? I know the correlation between weight gain and acid, but insulin and blood pH I don’t know. People may wonder “what does this have to do with the article?” As I stated the body can store acid in bodyfat, diet sodas are highly acidic. This has nothing to do with calories in this case. Another thing, I think it’s common sense it’s bad for us. That feeling you get in your throat, you feel kind of bloated and all weird in the stomach after drinking them. We should know that’s not good for us.
To put things in perspective.
pH of diet sodas
water = 7.0(neutral)
diet coke = 3.39
diet 7-up = 3.67
diet dr.pepper = 3.41
Battery Acid = 1.00 -
I typically have one soda a day (which could be a 12 oz can to a 24 oz bottle), and one packet of Crystal Light type mix per 32 oz. of water three or four times a day.
Since I'm leaner, more fit and healthier now than I was before I switched to artificial sweeteners, I have to say that it's not making me fat.
It's about "health" not fat.0 -
Correlation != causation...0
-
interesting. thanks for the post!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions