Chicken Breast

Can anyone please provide (or let me copy from their diary) a correct and accurate boneless chicken breast, cooked entry? I have searched the database and can't find one that is confirmed by more than 1 user. This website has changed a little bit since I was last active, and the list of chicken breast is enormous and some are very inaccurate. I appreciate the help, thanks

Replies

  • sammyliftsandeats
    sammyliftsandeats Posts: 2,421 Member
    Try weighing raw and using an entry that matches USDA information.

    Cooked entries will vary because everyone has different cooking methods and it may produce different results. These entries are user-generated so someone may have created an entry that included cooking oil but did not specify in the entry.
  • KiyaK
    KiyaK Posts: 519 Member
    I've always searched the way I cooked the chicken have either it in ounces. Ex: grilled chicken or pan fried chicken. Picked the one that made the most sense. I've never had a problem losing weight (if I'm being honest & weighing/logging every bite)

    Counting calories, no matter how accurate you try to be, will always have a little big of wiggle from. There is no way to have a completely and totally accurate count for the day. Make peach with it. Try to be accurate, but don't drive yourself crazy. Then move on.
  • sweetilemon
    sweetilemon Posts: 122 Member
    I'm having chicken tomorrow, from the packet it's 213cals for 1 chicken breast at 150g.
  • Spliner1969
    Spliner1969 Posts: 3,233 Member
    edited October 2016
    We buy ours from Wal-Mart, boneless, skinless. There's a confirmed entry in the diary for them as well as the boneless skinless chicken thighs from there. Makes it easy to log. But, when in doubt, the USDA calories for chicken breast are the best to use, so use any entry that is close to theirs for 1oz.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    edited October 2016
    Get the syntax for foods like this from the USDA database: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list

    6145f4d30eb5c54bacb7b69717ff06d0.png

    And plug that into MFP.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Unfortunatelt there is no USDA entry for grilled chicken breast and their entry for cooked breast is way off the package nutrition info from Perdue or Wegmans for cooked chicken breast.. Probably because it's trimmed and not coming directly from a whole chicken. So honestly I just use Perdue entries now (120 calories for 3oz cooked).. and I trim all the fat anyway.
  • badnoodle
    badnoodle Posts: 216 Member
    This may seem a weird method, but I looked up the USDA yield rate for different meats after cooking. For chicken in direct heat, it's about 75-80%, so I use the package calories, but log a serving 25% larger than I actually eat.
    I did verify this myself. I weighed some breasts, grilled them, and weighed again. The cooked mass averaged 78% of the raw mass.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    badnoodle wrote: »
    This may seem a weird method, but I looked up the USDA yield rate for different meats after cooking. For chicken in direct heat, it's about 75-80%, so I use the package calories, but log a serving 25% larger than I actually eat.
    I did verify this myself. I weighed some breasts, grilled them, and weighed again. The cooked mass averaged 78% of the raw mass.

    Wegmans lists calories for cooked and raw, usually, and 3oz cooked is the same as 4oz raw, which seems about the same (plus you'll lose fat when you cook the meat anyway).
  • zoritt
    zoritt Posts: 68 Member
    Try weighing raw and using an entry that matches USDA information.
    .

    This is what I do.
  • capaul42
    capaul42 Posts: 1,390 Member
    zoritt wrote: »
    Try weighing raw and using an entry that matches USDA information.
    .

    This is what I do.

    Same. So much easier.
  • Unknown
    edited October 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • ahoy_m8
    ahoy_m8 Posts: 3,053 Member
    edited October 2016
    How much moisture evaporates in cooking varies widely based on cooking method, internal temperature, how long it's cooled after cooking, etc. Weigh raw if you can. If you're cooking big batches for many meals, weigh before & after and pro rate it. Or just guess. Weighing raw is more accurate but guessing is unlikely to be more than 20% off. Your deficit (and protein requirement) may tolerate that margin of error. Some people are interested in their own data and strive for accuracy whereas others don't care so long as they're getting results.