nutrition facts percentage to grams

Options
hi
some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
total fat 2.7%
carb64%
prot 12%
can i convert it to grams?

Replies

  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,867 Member
    Options
    You have to pay for that...
  • Elise4270
    Elise4270 Posts: 8,375 Member
    edited October 2016
    Options
    hi
    some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
    total fat 2.7%
    carb64%
    prot 12%
    can i convert it to grams?

    Sure. 2.7% is 2.7/100 x whatever the whole is. Percent of what though? Percent of the RDA?

    Is this a food label? Or within mfp?

    MFP should give you both. I'm on mobile.thus is found in Nutrition

    Screenshot_20161020-150453_zpswtkzbnyh.png
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    Options
    hi
    some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
    total fat 2.7%
    carb64%
    prot 12%
    can i convert it to grams?

    What food is this? I've never seen a food label that only lists info like this. Are those percentages related to total grams (weight) of the food? I'm assuming that the missing 21.3% is water.
  • montherzaben
    montherzaben Posts: 15 Member
    Options
    Elise4270 wrote: »
    hi
    some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
    total fat 2.7%
    carb64%
    prot 12%
    can i convert it to grams?

    Sure. 2.7% is 2.7/100 x whatever the whole is. Percent of what though? Percent of the RDA?

    Is this a food label? Or within mfp?

    MFP should give you both. I'm on mobile.thus is found in Nutrition

    Screenshot_20161020-150453_zpswtkzbnyh.png

    yes,this is a food label
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 27,996 Member
    edited October 2016
    Options
    jemhh wrote: »
    hi
    some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
    total fat 2.7%
    carb64%
    prot 12%
    can i convert it to grams?

    What food is this? I've never seen a food label that only lists info like this. Are those percentages related to total grams (weight) of the food? I'm assuming that the missing 21.3% is water.

    The percentages are referring to the RDA for a 2,000 calorie diet.

    d0bb7280e3cd55d726fdf6ede2d8283a.png

    I'd like some tips for turning grams into percentages from when I am verifying info from the USDA database, which is all grams, with the MFP database, which is part percentages.
  • lynn_glenmont
    lynn_glenmont Posts: 10,020 Member
    edited October 2016
    Options
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    hi
    some products has macros lables as percentage not grams,for example
    total fat 2.7%
    carb64%
    prot 12%
    can i convert it to grams?

    What food is this? I've never seen a food label that only lists info like this. Are those percentages related to total grams (weight) of the food? I'm assuming that the missing 21.3% is water.

    The percentages are referring to the RDA for a 2,000 calorie diet.

    d0bb7280e3cd55d726fdf6ede2d8283a.png

    I'd like some tips for turning grams into percentages from when I am verifying info from the USDA database, which is all grams, with the MFP database, which is part percentages.

    If you're talking about vitamins A and C and the minerals calcium and iron, nutrition labels in the U.S. express them as percentages of daily values known as Reference Daily Intakes: 5000 IUs (international units) for vitamin A, 60 mg for vitamin C, 1000 mg for calcium, and 18 mg for iron.

    http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm064928.htm


    ETA: you may already know this, but the actual recommended daily amounts vary by age, gender, and whether you're pregnant or lactating, so 100% of these vitamins or minerals may be more or less than you actually need. And 100% of vitamin A (on a label) is, I believe, at least 67% more than the current recommended daily amount for any age/gender/reproductive category; apparently it's based on old studies and they've never changed the labeling rules to reflect more recent data?