Do you use a wearable pedometer?

rcrough
rcrough Posts: 23 Member
edited November 14 in Fitness and Exercise
Hello everyone and Happy New Year. I'm am trying to decide what to buy for a pedometer and I need help. I went to Dick's Sporting Goods yesterday and was overwhelmed by the choices. Do you use one? What features do find useful?
«1

Replies

  • kristynsflab
    kristynsflab Posts: 66 Member
    I just have a fit bit zip - it links to computer or smart phone and to here. easy, simple and just right for me
  • jcminuk
    jcminuk Posts: 1 Member
    I have he Fitbit Alta. I love it. Doubles as a watch for me and real motivator
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    edited January 2017
    The key question is, what are you hoping to gain from it?

    I'd also ask whether you have friends/ family that use them?

    FitBit have huge brand recognition, and a lot of market penetration. The technology is adequate, if a bit mediocre, and they have a high failure rate but very good customer service that has traditionally replaced defect units without issue. The social platform is good.

    Garmin make a limited range of low end fitness trackers as most of their market are active sportspersons. The technology is better but the social platform much more limited. If you're into challenges then these are probably less attractive.

    Polar make decent technology but interoperability is questionable.

    If you have friends/ family and you want to interact, then find out what they have and follow the herd.

    Personally, unless you run or cycle, don't worry about devices with built in Heart Rate. It's meaningless for most people, most of the time.
  • Misspinklift
    Misspinklift Posts: 384 Member
    The best feature you wanna look for are steps, calories, and heart rate. You want these so you can track your heart rate during your work out and after.
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    The best feature you wanna look for are steps, calories, and heart rate. You want these so you can track your heart rate during your work out and after.

    What about distance, does it measure that?
  • erockem
    erockem Posts: 278 Member
    My wife and I have used a BodyBug, Fitbit Flex, Fitbit Alta, and now I use a Garmin 235. I really like the Flex (used 2+ years) but once the Alta came out, I got it for my wife. It was such a great upgrade over the Flex. I can't recommend it enough.
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    The key question is, what are you hoping to gain from it?

    I'd also ask whether you have friends/ family that use them?

    FitBit have huge brand recognition, and a lot of market penetration. The technology is adequate, if a bit mediocre, and they have a high failure rate but very good customer service that has traditionally replaced defect units without issue. The social platform is good.

    Garmin make a limited range of low end fitness trackers as most of their market are active sportspersons. The technology is better but the social platform much more limited. If you're into challenges then these are probably less attractive.

    Polar make decent technology but interoperability is questionable.

    If you have friends/ family and you want to interact, then find out what they have and follow the herd.

    Personally, unless you run or cycle, don't worry about devices with built in Heart Rate. It's meaningless for most people, most of the time.

    The high failure rate is concerning. I did have a fitbit when they first came out and the strap broke almost immediately.
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    jcminuk wrote: »
    I have he Fitbit Alta. I love it. Doubles as a watch for me and real motivator

    Thanks, have you had any concerns about failing or durability?
  • kenyonhaff
    kenyonhaff Posts: 1,377 Member
    I have a free app downloaded to my phone so when I go for a walk it's a pedometer. Not sure if its less accurate than a pedometer but it's free!
  • caryesings
    caryesings Posts: 1 Member
    I asked the beau for a tracker for Christmas but to not spend a lot on it as I have a history of pedometers in the drawer. He got me a refurb Vivofit by Garmin. Works well so far. Very impressed with the wearability of it. I'm a person who rarely wore a watch because I found having something on my wrist annoying. This is light and the band material doesn't slip. I don't use the sleep tracking feature as I don't want to wear at night. One feature that I'm learning to like is the red band that appears if I haven't moved in a while to remind me to get off my butt for a while.
  • macgurlnet
    macgurlnet Posts: 1,946 Member
    edited January 2017
    rcrough wrote: »
    The key question is, what are you hoping to gain from it?

    I'd also ask whether you have friends/ family that use them?

    FitBit have huge brand recognition, and a lot of market penetration. The technology is adequate, if a bit mediocre, and they have a high failure rate but very good customer service that has traditionally replaced defect units without issue. The social platform is good.

    Garmin make a limited range of low end fitness trackers as most of their market are active sportspersons. The technology is better but the social platform much more limited. If you're into challenges then these are probably less attractive.

    Polar make decent technology but interoperability is questionable.

    If you have friends/ family and you want to interact, then find out what they have and follow the herd.

    Personally, unless you run or cycle, don't worry about devices with built in Heart Rate. It's meaningless for most people, most of the time.

    The high failure rate is concerning. I did have a fitbit when they first came out and the strap broke almost immediately.

    Fitbit has somewhat addressed that failure issue - all their wrist trackers, except the Surge, now have straps that can be swapped out. You can get replacements through the Fitbit website or elsewhere, like Amazon and Ebay. So, rather than having to spend $100+ on a new tracker if the strap breaks after a year, you can spend much less on a band/strap and get more life out of the Fitbit.

    I had a Flex and recently upgraded to the Blaze because I wanted notifications for everything, not just calls and texts. I likely would have gone with the Charge 2 otherwise since I prefer the horizontal display. The alta looks nice, but I don't think I would like the vertical display as much!

    ~Lyssa
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    macgurlnet wrote: »
    rcrough wrote: »
    The key question is, what are you hoping to gain from it?

    I'd also ask whether you have friends/ family that use them?

    FitBit have huge brand recognition, and a lot of market penetration. The technology is adequate, if a bit mediocre, and they have a high failure rate but very good customer service that has traditionally replaced defect units without issue. The social platform is good.

    Garmin make a limited range of low end fitness trackers as most of their market are active sportspersons. The technology is better but the social platform much more limited. If you're into challenges then these are probably less attractive.

    Polar make decent technology but interoperability is questionable.

    If you have friends/ family and you want to interact, then find out what they have and follow the herd.

    Personally, unless you run or cycle, don't worry about devices with built in Heart Rate. It's meaningless for most people, most of the time.

    The high failure rate is concerning. I did have a fitbit when they first came out and the strap broke almost immediately.

    Fitbit has somewhat addressed that failure issue - all their wrist trackers, except the Surge, now have straps that can be swapped out. You can get replacements through the Fitbit website or elsewhere, like Amazon and Ebay. So, rather than having to spend $100+ on a new tracker if the strap breaks after a year, you can spend much less on a band/strap and get more life out of the Fitbit.

    I had a Flex and recently upgraded to the Blaze because I wanted notifications for everything, not just calls and texts. I likely would have gone with the Charge 2 otherwise since I prefer the horizontal display. The alta looks nice, but I don't think I would like the vertical display as much!

    Thanks for your feedback. I'll check these out.
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    caryesings wrote: »
    I asked the beau for a tracker for Christmas but to not spend a lot on it as I have a history of pedometers in the drawer. He got me a refurb Vivofit by Garmin. Works well so far. Very impressed with the wearability of it. I'm a person who rarely wore a watch because I found having something on my wrist annoying. This is light and the band material doesn't slip. I don't use the sleep tracking feature as I don't want to wear at night. One feature that I'm learning to like is the red band that appears if I haven't moved in a while to remind me to get off my butt for a while.

    Oooh. I like the nagging feature! :)
  • rcrough
    rcrough Posts: 23 Member
    kenyonhaff wrote: »
    I have a free app downloaded to my phone so when I go for a walk it's a pedometer. Not sure if its less accurate than a pedometer but it's free!

    Yeah, This is sort of what I have now. It works ok as long as I always have my phone with me.
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    edited January 2017
    The best feature you wanna look for are steps, calories, and heart rate. You want these so you can track your heart rate during your work out and after.

    Steps - all activity trackers will give you steps. Most will translate that to distance. Look for one that allows you to tweak for your stride distance. Trackers use average (for your height) stride lengths for your distance.

    Calories - this is a guesstimate based on your height, weight, age, gender and activity level. Other important factors that can mess with this guesstimate are wrist vs. clip on; heart rate monitor (see below) or not. This is not a factor for most types of exercise.

    Heart rate monitor (HRM) - this is useful if you are measuring steady state cardio (not walking, not strength training, not yoga, not circuit training, etc). This is going to be more accurate if the unit comes with a separate chest trap for heart rate. Wrist only jobs aren't that accurate.

    I have a FitBit One - it works well for me because my cardio is step based. I do wish it had a nagging feature. I like that it clips onto my bra because it won't count steps when I'm driving, but it will count steps when I'm holding onto a shopping cart. If I were a swimmer or a cyclist this model would be a poor choice.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/1290-fitbit-users
  • rosnz
    rosnz Posts: 91 Member
    I have just upgraded from a basic Fitbit one to a charge 2 ( with HR) and I'm really liking it. Do I need all the features ..probably not but do I enjoy playing with them, seeing how long I've done in each fat burning zone or at what HR - yes! It adds motivation to my excercise My son has a top range Garmin and mine calibrated to my stride is within 2% accuracy at 1/5th of the price.
  • MelanieCN77
    MelanieCN77 Posts: 4,047 Member
    I've had several clip Fitbits that I really liked and now use an Apple Watch. I don't have any experience with the watch band Fitbits but I have a friend who loves her Surge.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    TeaBea wrote: »
    The best feature you wanna look for are steps, calories, and heart rate. You want these so you can track your heart rate during your work out and after.

    Steps - all activity trackers will give you steps. Most will translate that to distance. Look for one that allows you to tweak for your stride distance. Trackers use average (for your height) stride lengths for your distance.

    Calories - this is a guesstimate based on your height, weight, age, gender and activity level. Other important factors that can mess with this guesstimate are wrist vs. clip on; heart rate monitor (see below) or not. This is not a factor for most types of exercise.

    Heart rate monitor (HRM) - this is useful if you are measuring steady state cardio (not walking, not strength training, not yoga, not circuit training, etc). This is going to be more accurate if the unit comes with a separate chest trap for heart rate. Wrist only jobs aren't that accurate.

    I have a FitBit One - it works well for me because my cardio is step based. I do wish it had a nagging feature. I like that it clips onto my bra because it won't count steps when I'm driving, but it will count steps when I'm holding onto a shopping cart. If I were a swimmer or a cyclist this model would be a poor choice.

    http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/1290-fitbit-users

    I also have a FitBit One and agree with your pros and cons.

    I started my research intending to buy a wrist unit with a heart rate monitor but a lot of the negative reviews mentioned either an allergic reaction to the device or it not being as accurate for steps as their previous models such as the One, so that's what I went with.
  • OldAssDude
    OldAssDude Posts: 1,436 Member
    If you are looking for something with advanced features, durable, water proof, and has all day heart rate monitoring, you can check out the Garmin vivoactive HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/538374

    If you want something even more advanced, you can check out the Garmin fenix3 HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/545480

    fitbits are great devices too, but not as durable, and none of them are water proof.

    Within the next 2 or 3 months there will be many new devices coming out to check out, so you may want to wait and see what they are. I am hoping fitbit comes out with a more advanced device that is water proof and has a good GPS with GLONASS.
  • fittocycle
    fittocycle Posts: 827 Member
    I have the Fitbit One and love it. Great customer service too!
  • jodijrt
    jodijrt Posts: 1 Member
    I have a garmin. Originally, i wanted a fitbit because it was the most recognizable brand but through talking to the staff at best buy, Garmin fit my needs. I have the Garmin vivosmart hr and love it. It syncs with myfitnesspal, connects with phone, gives my messages, tracks progress, sleep and most importantly - is waterproof! Yes i can swim, shower, snorkel. Price is lower too.
    Good luck on your search and hope this has been helpful.
  • WalkingDeadFrank
    WalkingDeadFrank Posts: 124 Member
    bcalvanese wrote: »
    If you are looking for something with advanced features, durable, water proof, and has all day heart rate monitoring, you can check out the Garmin vivoactive HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/538374

    If you want something even more advanced, you can check out the Garmin fenix3 HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/545480

    fitbits are great devices too, but not as durable, and none of them are water proof.

    Within the next 2 or 3 months there will be many new devices coming out to check out, so you may want to wait and see what they are. I am hoping fitbit comes out with a more advanced device that is water proof and has a good GPS with GLONASS.

    Agreed...Garmin Vivoactive Hr is a great fitness watch.

    It has gps, waterproof, active HR throughout the day including the option to use a chest strap during your activities if you want better accuracy. Only watch with that feature in the same price range is a polar but they do not have an active HR and I'm not sure if has a gps either.

    I had a Fitbit 2 and Blaze and took them back.
  • OldAssDude
    OldAssDude Posts: 1,436 Member
    bcalvanese wrote: »
    If you are looking for something with advanced features, durable, water proof, and has all day heart rate monitoring, you can check out the Garmin vivoactive HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/538374

    If you want something even more advanced, you can check out the Garmin fenix3 HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/545480

    fitbits are great devices too, but not as durable, and none of them are water proof.

    Within the next 2 or 3 months there will be many new devices coming out to check out, so you may want to wait and see what they are. I am hoping fitbit comes out with a more advanced device that is water proof and has a good GPS with GLONASS.

    Agreed...Garmin Vivoactive Hr is a great fitness watch.

    It has gps, waterproof, active HR throughout the day including the option to use a chest strap during your activities if you want better accuracy. Only watch with that feature in the same price range is a polar but they do not have an active HR and I'm not sure if has a gps either.

    I had a Fitbit 2 and Blaze and took them back.

    I have the fenix3 HR. Probably their most advanced sports watch, but I wanted something that can grow with me as I get more advanced with my fitness.

    I also have a Suunto Ambit3 Peak, and a Polar V800.
  • mimiyoyo1
    mimiyoyo1 Posts: 5 Member
    bcalvanese wrote: »
    If you are looking for something with advanced features, durable, water proof, and has all day heart rate monitoring, you can check out the Garmin vivoactive HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/538374

    If you want something even more advanced, you can check out the Garmin fenix3 HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/545480

    fitbits are great devices too, but not as durable, and none of them are water proof.

    Within the next 2 or 3 months there will be many new devices coming out to check out, so you may want to wait and see what they are. I am hoping fitbit comes out with a more advanced device that is water proof and has a good GPS with GLONASS.

    Agree. I have the Vivoactive HR and love it. It has a native GPS, so you don't have to rely on your phone for that. It's great for outdoor activities. I use it for running, hiking, and mountain biking. Long battery life. You can customize it by downloading apps and widgets. It's a high quality device and syncs up well with MFP.
  • darlof1977
    darlof1977 Posts: 1 Member
    I have a fitbit i wear pretty much 24/7. I have both the fitbit blaze, and a fitbit 1. I also have a polar m400 that i sometimes wear.
  • Tacklewasher
    Tacklewasher Posts: 7,122 Member
    Had a Vivosmart HR but found the software too buggy. Turn on an activity and it double counted the calories. Wife now uses it as a step counter. Went with a VivoActive HR and it is much better software wise. Like @mimiyoyo1 said, lots of things to download to it. Also, if you golf it can download courses. It isn't the best at a specific activity, but seems to be the best jack of all trades for a wearable.
  • WalkingDeadFrank
    WalkingDeadFrank Posts: 124 Member
    mimiyoyo1 wrote: »
    bcalvanese wrote: »
    If you are looking for something with advanced features, durable, water proof, and has all day heart rate monitoring, you can check out the Garmin vivoactive HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/538374

    If you want something even more advanced, you can check out the Garmin fenix3 HR.

    https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/545480

    fitbits are great devices too, but not as durable, and none of them are water proof.

    Within the next 2 or 3 months there will be many new devices coming out to check out, so you may want to wait and see what they are. I am hoping fitbit comes out with a more advanced device that is water proof and has a good GPS with GLONASS.

    Agree. I have the Vivoactive HR and love it. It has a native GPS, so you don't have to rely on your phone for that. It's great for outdoor activities. I use it for running, hiking, and mountain biking. Long battery life. You can customize it by downloading apps and widgets. It's a high quality device and syncs up well with MFP.

    Agreed...IMO it's the best watch for its price.
  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    Had a Vivosmart HR but found the software too buggy. Turn on an activity and it double counted the calories. ... Went with a VivoActive HR and it is much better software wise.

    The Vivo range of devices all use the same software for basic activity reconciliation. Some of it is on-board but the majority of the work happens in the back end on the Garmin Connect platform.

    The VivoSmart is a step counter with some very rudimentary sports tracking, the VivoActive is an entry level sports device, at twice the price.
  • CarlydogsMom
    CarlydogsMom Posts: 645 Member
    I have a Samsung Gear Fit 2 and really like it. Two things set it apart from most others in the same arena: One is that you can download songs to it (like 4 G memory built in, plus it has Spotify embedded if you use that app); the other is that it has a built-in GPS. Both of those mean I don't need to have my phone with me to listen to music while on a machine or track/map my walks/bike rides.

    The biggest drawback is that the associated app (S-Health) does NOT synch with MFP. Hopefully, it will soon, but at this point it does not. I think there are workarounds, but so far I really don't care. I actually like the S-Health app, and I'm not tracking my food as diligently as I was when I was in losing mode (now I'm in maintenance).

    I REALLY like this Gear Fit 2. You get an HR monitor (not that big of a deal to me though), texts/phone/other notifications (you choose which), with short automatic replies you can send from your watch; music, GPS, health "nudges" when you're inactive; sleep monitor (which I didn't think I'd care about, but now love!); and pretty much everything else the others have.

  • LulaicaLoses
    LulaicaLoses Posts: 36 Member
    I use a Fitbit Flex and have loved it. I'm contemplating upgrading to the Alta though for some of the newer features (watch, mobile notifications). My fiance is looking to switch over to Fitbit products since they have the connectivity that his current one doesn't.
This discussion has been closed.