Eating all the calories!

SierraFatToSkinny
SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
edited November 16 in Health and Weight Loss
Okay! So I purchased a Fitbit Blaze earlier today. I'm still a little bit confused as to how to go about my new life as a HR monitor owner.

I have it synced to my phone and it's adjusting calories for me. I wore it for half the day and it adjusted about 300 calories. (C25K Week 6 Day 1 and then a walk around the block.)

I'm 5'8"and 266lbs. I set MFP goals to 2lbs loss a week. Sedentary setting gives me a daily food allotment of 1480.

I plan to eat back all the adjusted calories. ALL. ;)

Am I good to go? Will that lead to a 2lbs loss a week?
«1

Replies

  • deviousme7
    deviousme7 Posts: 61 Member
    I agree, only eat half at the most
  • frawley23
    frawley23 Posts: 31 Member
    I eat between 1/2 and 3/4 of my Fitbit adjusted calories and with tight, consistent food logging am losing at or under my estimated weight loss of 1lb a week. I'd start eating back a percentage and see what the scale says.
  • Silentpadna
    Silentpadna Posts: 1,306 Member
    I've got a Fitbit also (a Charge HR). While I am thinking it may be overestimating my calories burned, it seems to match what the various TDEE sites say I would be burning based on me thinking active and entering moderate. The calories burned sits right between the two most days. As a 225-lb male, I've been keeping an average deficit of around 1100 calories (I'm actually trying to eat a little bit more, but 1950 calories of nutritious food is pretty filling).

    Anyway my data is limited as I have not been tracking closely except for the past 4 weeks or so. It's been a relatively steady 2 lbs/week. I've noticed that I get heavier a day or so after strength workouts, so the weight fluctuates as expected. So with the caveat that this is limited data and still short term, my Fitbit may be closer to accurate than I expected it to be.
  • SierraFatToSkinny
    SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
    w0su575alk2u.png
    j5huaihdi4ac.png

    How reasonable is that burn... seems inflated.
  • Susieq_1994
    Susieq_1994 Posts: 5,361 Member
    edited March 2017
    I find it pretty crazy, but you're a bit taller and heavier than I am (5'6, 212 lbs). According to my own stats plugged into multiple TDEE calculators and mostly confirmed via tracking my numbers in a spreadsheet, 10,000 steps gets me 2400 calories with my sedentary TDEE being ~2150. I'm not sure how much more your extra pounds and inches 'buy' you, but I would have to get around 35,000 steps for that calorie number.

    Edit: Clarifying something I didn't type very clearly.
  • SusanMFindlay
    SusanMFindlay Posts: 1,804 Member
    If you have MFP set to lose 2 pounds/week, eat back all the exercise calories.

    Then pay attention to how much weight you actually lose and adjust from there. If you lose less than the expected 8 pounds/month, cut back on how many exercise calories you eat. If you lose more than expected, eat a little more (relative to your goal; understand that your calorie goal will naturally decrease a little as you lose weight). If you lose as expected, stick to the plan.

    The reason that I think you should start off eating back all the exercise calories is that if they're right and you don't eat them back, you lose weight faster than is healthy. If they're wrong and you eat them back anyway, you lose weight slightly slower than expected - but, with a 2 pound/week goal, you still lose weight pretty quickly (worst case scenario would be 1.5 pounds/week if you eat back 250 calories more than you burned).

    If you were only aiming to lose 0.5 pounds/week, I'd advise you to be more cautious about not eating back too much. But aiming for 2 pounds/week, it's more important not to eat back too little.
  • jennybearlv
    jennybearlv Posts: 1,519 Member
    I use Garmin and anytime I see Fitbit calories posted they always seem crazy high in comparison. Garmin used to say I burned about 400 calories walking steep hills for 3 miles, not running so that could be the difference, when I was in the 260's. Last time I had a burn that high I ran 4 miles through sand and gravel then walked another 2 miles for a total of about 20000 steps for the day. In my experience Garmin underestimates my burn a bit, but that's still a big difference. I'm 5'3", 220.
  • SierraFatToSkinny
    SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
    My only exercise of the day was 20-25ish minutes of trail running. The trail was moderate for the most part. There were a couple staircases I had to run up and down.

    I also ran faster today than I would typically... taking breaks between runs allows me to kick into a higher gear.

    And I was also rather ravenous tonight.... I'm hungry again right now. So maybe I did burn a lot more.

    But... probably not 1100 calories worth. That seems too excessive.
  • mlinci
    mlinci Posts: 402 Member
    Over 1,000 calories for 10k steps does sound a bit excessive. I'm 5'5 and 140lbs and I get about 400 calories for 10k steps. But at your height you can certainly eat more than 1,500 calories a day and lose weight.

    PS you ate 0.2 of a chicken liver? That sounds more like you used it in a magic potion rather than in a recipe :)
  • Hoshiko
    Hoshiko Posts: 179 Member
    edited March 2017
    The first thing I noticed was the chicken liver too! :)

    It does seem a bit high to me. But, I agree with other people that at this stage you should probably eat back almost all of your daily burn and then adjust from there. That way you don't short change yourself, but it will also give you feedback on how accurate your fitbit is.

    P.S. nice job on the running!
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    edited March 2017
    Is your tracker heart-rate based? These are reasonably accurate for some people more than others because they try to guess at your max heart rate using formulas and those people happen to fall within an acceptable range of it, but may be less accurate for your own individual heart rate, plus they don't take into account fitness level like more advanced heart rate monitors. As suggested, start by eating whatever you determine to be a good percentage 25%, 50%, 100%, doesn't matter, and just watch what your weight does then adjust up or down accordingly to match your planned loss.

    ETA: also keep in mind that some trackers try to "guess" your activity level for the rest of the day by using your activity level during exercise, giving you more eat-back calories than the actual value. You can see if this is happening by checking your extra calories in the evening, then going back next day to see if they settled at a lower value.
  • SierraFatToSkinny
    SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
    edited March 2017
    Lol! @mlinci @hoshiko the chicken liver was part of a meal prep. I forgot to add it to the recipe so I had to tack it on to the meal. I mostly work from my phone and I'm limited on tweaking recipes. :D

    (I'm up way too late....) I ended up eating most of the calories. I figured 2400 wasn't too far off from what I was eating when I began losing weight and if I'm hungry, then I might as well enjoy it guilt free. I can be more moderate if I need to later.
  • mir1104
    mir1104 Posts: 101 Member
    I burn 1000-1200 cals in an olympic triathlon, 1.5km open water swim/40km bike/10k run.
    You can use this as a comparison on the estimation and what you did.
  • katharmonic
    katharmonic Posts: 5,720 Member
    That's suspicious for some double counting to me. There's no way that a 25 minute trail run burned 1000 calories. Investigate under Exercise in MFP to see if things are getting counted twice. I have found fitbit/Garmin to be pretty accurate but sometimes weird things happen.
  • Maxematics
    Maxematics Posts: 2,287 Member
    It's really going to take some time to assess how much you should be eating back. I feel like more often than not I read posts about how Fitbit was overestimating so much for people but I have to wonder how many of those people actually weighed all of their food to the gram to ensure accuracy. Please don't let that deter you from eating. Like others have suggested, I'd start with 50 to 75% depending on how hungry you are.

    I've been a Fitbit user since July 2015; I started with the Charge HR and upgraded to the Charge 2 when it was released. I didn't believe the burns either at first, so only ate back 25 to 50%. Now that I'm leaner and don't have as much body fat to sustain me, I have to eat them all back. In fact I have to eat more than Fitbit says I do, as it was underestimating my TDEE. I'm 5'3" and 113 pounds or so; my Fitbit gives me 2100 to 2500 daily and I'm doing just fine. What you're getting doesn't seem all that farfetched to me, honestly. Good luck!
  • SusanMFindlay
    SusanMFindlay Posts: 1,804 Member
    mir1104 wrote: »
    I burn 1000-1200 cals in an olympic triathlon, 1.5km open water swim/40km bike/10k run.
    You can use this as a comparison on the estimation and what you did.

    What do you weigh?

    My husband weighs 215 pounds. On a day in which he gets 10,000 steps, he easily burns 3500 calories (which is what her total daily burn was reported as; her weight is 266 pounds). He eats about 3000 calories/day and is losing weight steadily.

    For the people who think the numbers are too big - you're projecting what the numbers would be for you at your weight. It doesn't work that way. I've taken 10,000 steps more than my husband today. His daily calorie burn is still higher than mine. Because he weighs 60 pounds more than me.
  • SierraFatToSkinny
    SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
    Okay! I've been through some trial and error with my Fitbit.

    This is what I think is happening.

    My BMR is about 2000. I have my Fitbit set to lose 2 pounds a week. I think it deducts the 2 pounds from my BMR and then the adjustment is everything above the BMR.

    I've set my MFP calories to 1000 calories less than my BMR and I'm going to eat all my exercise calories.

    bqzabo621kfz.png

  • jessiferrrb
    jessiferrrb Posts: 1,758 Member
    i just want to agree that your fitbit will be more and more accurate the longer you wear it. i have the tan lines to prove it. lol
  • SierraFatToSkinny
    SierraFatToSkinny Posts: 463 Member
    That's not how the syncing from MFP and Fitbit works. You should set MFP to sedentary and let MFP do the work. It adjusts accordingly with your goals and the data sent from your Fitbit. You just need to test the numbers in the real world for a period to see how accurate you are. Fiddling about with your own numbers while having the devices synced could just knock things out of whack even more.

    You can see in the picture I posted that the Fitbit app says I have 1047 calories to eat.

    This is at the start of the day. Just moving around will earn me "exercise" calories. I end up with at least 300-500 calories even sedentary days.

    On days I run I often end up with 1000+ calories.
  • VintageFeline
    VintageFeline Posts: 6,771 Member
    That's not how the syncing from MFP and Fitbit works. You should set MFP to sedentary and let MFP do the work. It adjusts accordingly with your goals and the data sent from your Fitbit. You just need to test the numbers in the real world for a period to see how accurate you are. Fiddling about with your own numbers while having the devices synced could just knock things out of whack even more.

    You can see in the picture I posted that the Fitbit app says I have 1047 calories to eat.

    This is at the start of the day. Just moving around will earn me "exercise" calories. I end up with at least 300-500 calories even sedentary days.

    On days I run I often end up with 1000+ calories.

    Fitbit will adjust as the day goes on, as long as you are aware of this and know roughly where you will actually be at the end of the day you can plan accordingly. If you have calories left carry them forward to another day and vice versa.

    And your definition of sedentary is probably different to MFPs definition of sedentary and to reiterate, your numbers aren't crazy when we take into account your height and current weight.

    And once again, as stated several times, you adjust as you have real world data to work with. What your losses actually are and how that aligns with Fitbit numbers.

    By making your own adjustments you're over complicating it and defeating the purpose of having the trackers and having it synced to MFP.

  • srk369
    srk369 Posts: 256 Member
    That's not how the syncing from MFP and Fitbit works. You should set MFP to sedentary and let MFP do the work. It adjusts accordingly with your goals and the data sent from your Fitbit. You just need to test the numbers in the real world for a period to see how accurate you are. Fiddling about with your own numbers while having the devices synced could just knock things out of whack even more.

    You can see in the picture I posted that the Fitbit app says I have 1047 calories to eat.

    This is at the start of the day. Just moving around will earn me "exercise" calories. I end up with at least 300-500 calories even sedentary days.

    On days I run I often end up with 1000+ calories.

    Fitbit will adjust as the day goes on, as long as you are aware of this and know roughly where you will actually be at the end of the day you can plan accordingly. If you have calories left carry them forward to another day and vice versa.

    And your definition of sedentary is probably different to MFPs definition of sedentary and to reiterate, your numbers aren't crazy when we take into account your height and current weight.

    And once again, as stated several times, you adjust as you have real world data to work with. What your losses actually are and how that aligns with Fitbit numbers.

    By making your own adjustments you're over complicating it and defeating the purpose of having the trackers and having it synced to MFP.

    VintageFeline is correct, use your real world data and adjust. I posted this earlier this week on another thread...

    I have used my actual data. (1) Sum up the last 28 days of your calorie totals. (2) Pounds lost in those 28 days *3500. Add those 2 numbers together and divide by 28. That will be a real value of what your TDEE is. I find mine comes in higher than the estimates and usually a little lower than my garmin #

    For you since you've had your fitbit about 2 weeks, use your 2 weeks of data and change the 28 to 14 or whatever the number of data you have. I keep all my info in Excel and run this calculation once a week using the prior 4 weeks data. This gives me a truer picture of my TDEE. I love my garmin w/HR for run data and steps, and on some days it comes in real close and other really active days (high steps and run activity) it comes in about 10-20% high.
  • crooked_left_hook
    crooked_left_hook Posts: 364 Member
    Don't pay attention to the calories in the Fitbit app. Log your food in MFP, set your activity to sedentary, and let MFP adjust your calories for you. Only log non-step based exercise in MFP...let Fitbit count the steps for things like running, walking, elliptical. If you try follow the calorie in/out info in Fitbit and MFP, you will go crazy. At the end of the week look at your Fitbit average calorie burn for the week and see how it compares to what MFP says. It will get more accurate over the next month after it learns your heart rate patterns.

    I use this method and I find that it is pretty accurate. I have my activity set to 'lightly active' because I always get a min of 5000 steps a day. MFP only adds exercise calories when I go over 5000. For 2.5-3 miles of running (30 min because I'm a turtle), which for me is equal to about 5000-6000 steps, MFP gives me about 200-250 calories (for my height and weight). This is consistent with most databases I've checked, and a little less than what the treadmill says, so I consider it pretty accurate. At the end of the week the MFP and Fitbit averages for calories burned are pretty close.
  • VintageFeline
    VintageFeline Posts: 6,771 Member
    And i've just noticed, the 1000 calories you have "left" is including everything, the calories you have used from existing since midnight. You haven't eaten yet (0 cals in) so that's where that is coming from.
  • Sassafras106
    Sassafras106 Posts: 73 Member
    w0su575alk2u.png
    j5huaihdi4ac.png

    How reasonable is that burn... seems inflated.
    w0su575alk2u.png
    j5huaihdi4ac.png

    How reasonable is that burn... seems inflated.

    This is below the number of calories I'm still able to lose at and I weigh a less and am short so you would most likely be ok with a few hundred more... I do run though, and I walk around a lot

    I subtract 25 percent of my exercise calories and then eat that number

This discussion has been closed.