NOT eating exercise calories

Lashawn71188
Lashawn71188 Posts: 13 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
I'm so lost when people say they eat back the calories that they burn during exercise. My goal is to be in as much of a calorie deficit as possible ( as much that is healthy for me of course) Is this the norm? My goal is to burn even more calories through exercise not bring me back to my daily calorie goal by eating them back. Any else not eating their calories back and why?
«1

Replies

  • Lashawn71188
    Lashawn71188 Posts: 13 Member
    Well I guess I'm not in the same boat as the people who eat their calories back. I still have a good amount of weight to lose (~40 lbs) and I have great energy, I eat over 120 grams of protein a day, and I time my meals to fuel and recover from my workouts. I'm averaging about 1-1.5 lbs lost a week so I am losing at a good pace I would say. I practice progress overload and I am definitely stronger than when I started. So I guess I'll continue to do what doing but thanks for the insight.
  • tinkerbellang83
    tinkerbellang83 Posts: 9,147 Member
    OP has left the building.
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    I'm so lost when people say they eat back the calories that they burn during exercise. My goal is to be in as much of a calorie deficit as possible ( as much that is healthy for me of course) Is this the norm? My goal is to burn even more calories through exercise not bring me back to my daily calorie goal by eating them back. Any else not eating their calories back and why?

    I eat them back because I want fat loss - not just weight loss. But I'm over 50 and maintaining lean muscle mass is important for me because I've already lost enough.

    If your initial calorie goal accounts for exercise (TDEE method) then you are technically eating them.
  • BlueSkyShoal
    BlueSkyShoal Posts: 325 Member
    edited April 2017
    If you don't eat your exercise calories back, isn't that the same as eating too few calories to begin with? Like if I exercise 200 calories off, and then eat 1200 calories, isn't that the same as doing no exercise and eating 1000 calories?

    (This is assuming that you know the "real" amount of calories you burned off . . . I understand people being skeptical of MFP's exercise tool.)

    While we're on the topic, are the calorie amounts on most exercise machines accurate? Like a treadmill or elliptical at the gym.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    Lol I wasn't angry or hungry. I'm new to the forum and didn't have the notifications on. But I totally agree with not eating too few calories as you continue to lose weight. When I started losing weight I had my calories pretty low (1400) but after doing some research I moved them up to 1800. Because I have PCOS I eat a low carb high fat diet and on my refeed day I bring my calories up to 1900-2000 which still keeps me in a deficit. I was trying to get some information to better educate myself on this journey. When I read what other said those things didn't apply to me in this moment. I totally get that the closer I get to my goal weight my calories will be lower and I'll need to eat as much as I can including those exercise calories.

    It sounds to me like you're using the TDEE method...see my previous post on NEAT vs TDEE...understanding the methodology is important. You're using customized calorie targets, not MFP calorie targets...thus your lack of understanding.
  • Lashawn71188
    Lashawn71188 Posts: 13 Member
    Okay I understand. Yes I am using the TDEE method and only tracking my food in MFP. I didn't know that there was certain method used on MFP. Thanks cwolfman13!
  • natasha_hal1
    natasha_hal1 Posts: 30 Member
    I do not eat my exercise calories back. I have about 4 pounds until my goal weight, so I have set MFP to maintenance at the sedentary level (1730 calories). I do exercise, however it is usually 30 minutes weight training OR 2-3 mile run. I do not input these into MFP at all. I figure that at most my net calories for the day may end up at 1300-1400 calories (depends on calorie burn) on the days I intentionally exercise. I do not worry about it too much.
  • Lashawn71188
    Lashawn71188 Posts: 13 Member
    Yes I definitely learned something today!
  • Kekekylene
    Kekekylene Posts: 112 Member
    cwolfman13 wrote: »
    I'm so lost when people say they eat back the calories that they burn during exercise. My goal is to be in as much of a calorie deficit as possible ( as much that is healthy for me of course) Is this the norm? My goal is to burn even more calories through exercise not bring me back to my daily calorie goal by eating them back. Any else not eating their calories back and why?

    This depends on where you're getting your calorie targets. If they are from MFP, exercise isn't included in your activity level...it's unaccounted for activity...your calorie target with MFP are based on the individual's NEAT (Non Exercise Activity Thermogensis) and to account for exercise you log it after the fact and get additional calories to fuel that activity.

    Other calculators assume exercise in the activity level...thus an estimate of the requisite calories are already included in the calorie target...if one were using this method, eating back calories would be double dipping because they are already accounted for.

    It's all about understanding the methodology being used. I don't use the MFP methodology, but if I did I would be a wreck if I didn't eat back calories...To lose 1 Lb per week MFP gives me a pre exercise target of around 1900 calories...I regularly go out and ride 30 miles and can burn around 1,000 calories doing that which would leave me a mere 900 calories to fuel my existence and other daily activities and I'd essentially be starving my body of energy and nutrients.

    I use the TDEE method which accounts for all of my activity including exercise and lose about 1 Lb per week eating 2500 calories...since exercise is included in that number I obviously wouldn't eat them back. Understanding the method is kind of important.

    ^This!
    The mfp program is made for you to eat back exercise calories, that's why the goal they give you is so low in the first place.

  • don9992
    don9992 Posts: 49 Member
    My plan is 1650 cals/day. If I ride a bike for 30 miles Map My Ride shows a 2500 calorie burn. To eat that all back means consuming over 4000 cals. Get real. That ain't happening.
  • spiriteagle99
    spiriteagle99 Posts: 3,752 Member
    Map my Ride is really overcalculating burn, unless you are doing a lot of hills or weigh a lot.

    BlueSkyshoal - machines at the gym are not accurate, unless you can input your weight. My NordicTrack doesn't allow that, and it seems to assume I weigh 250 pounds, given the amount of calories it says I burn.
  • don9992
    don9992 Posts: 49 Member
    Map my Ride is really overcalculating burn, unless you are doing a lot of hills or weigh a lot.

    BlueSkyshoal - machines at the gym are not accurate, unless you can input your weight. My NordicTrack doesn't allow that, and it seems to assume I weigh 250 pounds, given the amount of calories it says I burn.

    I expect you're right. On my ride today MMR said I burned 2449 cals. I also recorded the ride with a Polar HRM and watch and it shows 1242... almost half.
  • STEVE142142
    STEVE142142 Posts: 867 Member
    When I started my weight-loss journey I didn't eat my exercise calories back. Original weight was 288 pounds set a goal of losing 2 pounds per week. My current weight is 208 and I've been maintaining that for approximately eight months.

    One of the things you have to figure out is your goals if you just want to lose weight then I would not recommend eating back your calories it'll help the lose the weight faster. The only negative about that is that you're going to lose muscle mass dramatically. I was fixated on losing wait more than building muscle mass or maintaining my muscle. Now that I'm in maintenance my calorie goal is approximately 2400 calories a day but I'm probably eating three to four hundred more calories a day on average but not gaining any weight.

    I think it's a combination of my exercise intensity period I do work out 4 to 5 times a week. You also have to remember that NFP is General guidelines and everybody's going to have a different tdee based on their lifestyle and their genetics. A good part of the weight loss process is educating yourself Health Food affects you and some of it is a trial-and-error process
  • JeanieWww
    JeanieWww Posts: 4,037 Member
    laahawn711 wrote: »
    I'm so lost when people say they eat back the calories that they burn during exercise. My goal is to be in as much of a calorie deficit as possible ( as much that is healthy for me of course) Is this the norm? My goal is to burn even more calories through exercise not bring me back to my daily calorie goal by eating them back. Any else not eating their calories back and why?

    The bolded is why many people eat back exercise calories. Netting too low is not healthy for the body or the muscles.

    I was doing the same thing, and I tanked my metabolism by doing it. NOT a good idea. it will end up stalling your weight loss. Once I started eating back about 1/2 of what I burned, I actually started dropping more weight, faster.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    don9992 wrote: »
    My plan is 1650 cals/day. If I ride a bike for 30 miles Map My Ride shows a 2500 calorie burn. To eat that all back means consuming over 4000 cals. Get real. That ain't happening.

    @don9992

    I tried MMR very briefly and the calorie estimates were comically high, 2500 sounds a ludicrous number TBH!
    For 30 miles I would expect somewhere around 950 - 1000 for me.

    Strava seems much closer to reality.
  • don9992
    don9992 Posts: 49 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    don9992 wrote: »
    My plan is 1650 cals/day. If I ride a bike for 30 miles Map My Ride shows a 2500 calorie burn. To eat that all back means consuming over 4000 cals. Get real. That ain't happening.

    @don9992

    I tried MMR very briefly and the calorie estimates were comically high, 2500 sounds a ludicrous number TBH!
    For 30 miles I would expect somewhere around 950 - 1000 for me.

    Strava seems much closer to reality.

    Going back to my original point, even after rejecting the very high calorie number from MMR and using the 1249 from Polar, that still gives me about 2900 calories to consume in a day. There's no way I can eat that much.
This discussion has been closed.