Eat your work out calories??

Some do, some do not.
Figure out what works best for you!

Wow-you totally took my question for today! I think it does have something to do with your body thinking it's in starvation mode.

I am always afraid that maybe I didn't calculate something right and I always like to leave 100-200 calories under at the end of the day.

:happy:

I rarely eat my exercise calories and it has worked for me. I have still lost 45lbs since mid March. I tried eating them for a while and gained weight. If not eating them works for you then don't eat them, if eating only some of them works for you then do that. Weight loss is not 'one size fits all' figure out what works best for you!

Like I said in another thread, "Search" here is pretty broken. But if you go to google and do an advanced search...
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&as_q=eat+exercise+calorie&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&tbs=&num=10&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=www.myfitnesspal.com&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=images
you'll find that there are about 20,000 results within the past WEEK about eating exercise calories

Search here for the same phrase and your first 5 pages of results are all 3 or more months old.

i think a lot of it also depends on what kind of exercises you are doing and also where your heart rate is at.
60-70% of max heart rate is supposed to be the ideal fat burning heart rate.
cardio workouts will burn off fat, but strength workouts will require an extra intake of of protein, at least that is what i think

if you're hungry after, eat. if you are not, don't eat. you can also snack on some nuts to be safe.

I eat back a few of my workout calories. Its' I've never eaten back 100% of them. I've never gone into "starvation mode" by not eating them back either. To each their own...if you have a lot of weight to lose, then I would recommend NOT eating them. But whatever works.

I personally don't-- exercise calories are like a bonus to me, and I don't necessarily trust the accuracy of how they're calculated...give me more time, and I might change my mind, but for now I disregard the extra amount I am "allowed" and stick to my 1400 calorie limit.

I only consistently workout on Fri, Sat, Sun. Saturday and Sunday are strange days for me as I can normally only sqeeze two real meals in. I also weigh twice a week; Wed or Thur and then again on Sun. During the work week I usually have two take out meals - one mexican and one chinese. I figure those two meals take care of my exercise cals. I don't worry about eating them on the same day...always keep my body guessing! So far, so good.

Here's how I look at it...

If you're NOT going to eat those calories back, then you should be eating more than 1200 a day. 1200 is pretty much just for sedentary people. If you're exercising and burning 400 calories at a pop, you are no longer sedentary, no matter if you have a desk job or not. At very least, bump your activity level up to active to compensate for your activity.

But moreover, you have to understand that MFP doesn't factor in what kind of exercise you do UNTIL you do it. I've seen a couple people on here who either went to the doctor, or had their BMR calculated, and said that MFP "gave them" too low of a caloric goal.

I remember one said that she was told by her doctor to aim for 1400, but not to eat back her exercise calories, vs 1200 and exercise calories on MFP It works out to being about the same. Walk a half hour on the treadmill, and burn about 200 calories, and you get your 1400.

Someone else recently, someone pretty active who burns a lot at the gym, was told they should eat about 1800, and MFP gave them 1400. 1400 + a decent calorie burn of 400 = 1800.

It's the same math, but the allotment for exercise is added in at different times.

It depends. Even though I'm on a 1290 caloric goal, I eat about 1400-1600 a day and burn the remaining cals with exercise.
Normally I don't eat them back. But I'm lightly active anyway, so I rarely burn a lot unless I'm eating something high in calories.

I also haven't had a problem losing about 2lbs a week doing this.

To answer the question, I do not eat my workout calories. Exercise increases your metabolism. Any slight change to a person's metabolism by not eating those calories is counter balanced by the exercise itself. If I feel lethargic or even slightly out of energy I know that I am not eating enough and so I compensate for that. I don't eat because I need to reach some arbitrary number calories per day that has randomly been decided to be what I need. Dieting is an individual sport.

Starvation mode is a myth.

The following quote is from this website (http://www.dotfit.com/content-1459.html) which employs qualified professionals:

"Severely cutting calories will cause the metabolism to adjust slightly, but not enough to prevent fat loss

Remember that people around the world who truly die of starvation are not overweight when they expire. It’s true that when you severely cut calories your metabolism will make a slight adjustment, allowing your body to run on fewer calories—but it’s not a large compensation. If you need to lose weight and you are not, eat less and/or move more and forget about slowing your metabolism.

That said, the point is not to lose weight too quickly by drastically reducing calories because that method is generally not sustainable. Second, although there is a slight down regulation in metabolism in response to a very low calorie diet, the main reason it may appear to slow down more than it actually does is because the extremely low calorie intake is slowing YOU down. In other words, you become less energetic, forcing a reduction in your daily activities, therefore burning fewer calories overall. Crash dieting with excessively low calorie intake leads to low energy, so you burn fewer calories all day and work out less intensely. This leads to increased hunger, which in turn increased the chances of rebound and binge eating behavior. This can result in a calorie intake that temporarily exceeds your pre-diet intake, leading to a rapid re-accumulation of weight. This is easily misinterpreted as the results of a “damaged” metabolism. It is worth noting that any temporary, minor reduction in metabolic rate due to excessively low caloric intake is regained once caloric intake is increased. Your metabolism is not damageable. Take home message: Never blame failure on metabolism, no matter what anyone tells you! Simply move more."