Calories vs. Calories from Fat

The verified item in the database for "Jack Astor's Chicken Fingers" was submitted two years ago. The MFP Nutrition Facts pop-up window shows how many people agreed with the nutrition information. The verification of a item in the database seems to be based on a computer algorithm that appears to be weighted heavily on how many users agreed that the nutrition information was correct.

However, doing a quick checksum calculation of Calories from carbs + protein + fat grams, I got 467 Calories per serving of 5 fingers. Note that that is within three percent of the reported 481 Calories per serving for the 5 fingers. I would assume that MFP's computer algorithm allowed for the three percent variance on the checksum as long as enough MFP users agreed that the information was correct.

The verified item in the MFP Food Database is two years old, and the current nutrition facts from the Jack Astor's website lists the serving size as 478g, as opposed to 5 fingers. I would assume that the Jack Astor's website updated their nutrition facts over the past two years, and the verified item in the MFP Food Database is now incorrect.

I clicked No to vote that the information is not accurate. If enough people do that, perhaps the item will revert to non-verified and it can be edited. But, I would not wait for that. I would recommend creating a new item with the correct information from the restaurant's website.