Why did it take me so long to figure it out (Weight Watchers)

KM0692
KM0692 Posts: 178 Member
edited November 18 in Health and Weight Loss
I have been going back and forth between WW and calorie counting since the beginning of the year, unable to decide which is the better program for me. Well, last night I finally figured it out. There is NO way that Weight Watchers would work for me long term.

Calorie counting is so much simpler, and it's sustainable. I had been thinking in the short-term, not the long-term. I need to learn portion control, and yes, Weight Watchers teaches you this, but they are just too restrictive when it comes to treats. Do I really want to go to a birthday party and not be able to eat a slice of cake because it's almost my entire day's worth of points? No, I want to be able to work that cake into my day and with calorie counting, it is so much easier to do so!

I have NO idea why it took me this long to "see the light"! I cancelled my WW account tonight.
«1

Replies

  • bubaluboo
    bubaluboo Posts: 2,098 Member
    I was a fan of Slimming World but never joined, just followed the program. It worked but I got stuck in a rut of eating certain foods which were "free" but were not particularly tasty. It took a lot of effort to get with the CICO way of thinking. I just thought I didn't have the time. Actually I do and now I'm not restricted by the notion of free food or syns which is so much better. Now, looking at calorie contents, it's difficult to work out why certain foods are syns and others aren't at times. Adding a Fitbit into the CICO approach sealed the deal for me. I find it so easy to go with the calories that automatically update and for me the numbers seem to work so if I stick to what MFP says I lose...easy with a bit of will power thrown in.
  • annacole94
    annacole94 Posts: 994 Member
    The mystery to me is the people that pay for WW, but do online only. I understand the value of the social components of the meetings, but not how a paid app is better than a free one (other than massive brand recognition and advertising, of course).

    I considered doing it in person, but in the end, did the Diet Bet thing (which I know also mystifies many people here, as it wouldn't motivate them).
  • Silentpadna
    Silentpadna Posts: 1,306 Member
    I understand WW works for some, but I always remember that they exist to make a profit (good on them - have no issue with that). In order for them to be successful, they need to have people involved in all the other stuff. So while the basis of their weight loss program is ultimately a deficit, it is in their best interest to not really focus on that as much as on the other things that keep their customers involved. The best reason I can think of for them to have a (perhaps) less successful version, but one that keeps enough customers coming, is to consistently improve change things and to market their program differently. They certainly have enough success stories (and I think many are the real deal) to continue to sell their program.

    Like many others, if they can sell a system that seems easier for people to follow than counting calories (which is always sold as being difficult), then they are guaranteed to attract customers.
  • scarlett_k
    scarlett_k Posts: 812 Member
    If it actually worked in the long term then they'd be out of business. They want and need people to come back again and again. It's a scam.
  • Theo166
    Theo166 Posts: 2,564 Member
    What I liked about weight watchers was the accountability with the weekly meeting and weigh-in. If they focused more on calorie counting rather than excluding foods, it would be a winning combination.
  • polvo71
    polvo71 Posts: 42 Member
    annacole94 wrote: »
    The mystery to me is the people that pay for WW, but do online only. I understand the value of the social components of the meetings, but not how a paid app is better than a free one

    For me it was just not knowing that free apps that are as good or better than WW online even exist. Like the pp, I can't go to meetings and weigh in due to work and young family of five. Online was the best option. I'm so thankful I found MFP.
  • fitmom4lifemfp
    fitmom4lifemfp Posts: 1,572 Member
    whmscll wrote: »
    I did weight watchers in the 80s. What I remember is feeling "fat shamed" at meetings, because I only wanted to lose 10-15 pounds and I was not obese. The leader never called on me in meetings, and every time I walked in I got the eyeball from everyone else there. I also remember the trauma of being perfectly on track with my points and exercise, but showing no loss, or even a GAIN at weekly weigh-in, which was completely de-motivating. I now weigh several times a week, am more in tune with my body's natural fluctuations and have learned a TON more stuff from MFP.

    That's one reason I never did meetings - there was no way in h.e.l.l I was weighing in front of anyone. :# But honestly, my sister did it for 6 months and never felt *shamed*. I know many people that did WW years ago, and had no such experience. I think yours was probably not the norm.
This discussion has been closed.