Taking a break from counting, intuitive eating?
jla2425
Posts: 67 Member
Have you ever tried taking a break from counting and logging every detail and weighing out all your food? Now i am just trying because i was getting to thoughtful about my eating. I was always thinking of what im going to eat and stressing out. Now i just eat healthy and I only weigh out the meat and cheese. Other things i eat portion sizes but i do snack here and there. Im not logging but so far its been good and i eat more comfortably. Will see how i weigh in on monday. Has anyone else had better results eating intuitive vs counting?
1
Replies
-
I suck at intuitive eating. I get too hungry and end up eating way over my TDEE. My sedentary TDEE is around 1700 and I could easily eat 2000+ calories every day to feel pleasantly satiated - not stuffed, just not hungry.
I don't mind calorie counting and don't find it too stressful. I do a lot of meal prep, and input my recipes into MFP so I know the calories of the serving. So it's just a few clicks to throw it into my diary.9 -
My intuition tells me to eat pizza, chips, and drink beer, so I need to count and keep track of everything. Perhaps after a year or so of tracking I will be better, but I can't do that at this time. If it works for you that's fantastic.13
-
I loathe tracking. Used it as a tool to reign things in, get a handle on portion control, be aware of serving sizes and calorically dense foods. There is a world beyond meticulous tracking, it's up to the individual to see if they can do so. Hopefully it works for you. Regardless of tracking or intuitive, eating should be as stress free as it can.5
-
Well i must say i hope i can still lose but glad for the replys all0
-
I loathe tracking. Used it as a tool to reign things in, get a handle on portion control, be aware of serving sizes and calorically dense foods. There is a world beyond meticulous tracking, it's up to the individual to see if they can do so. Hopefully it works for you. Regardless of tracking or intuitive, eating should be as stress free as it can.
This is much like me. I don't loathe tracking, I'd just rather not - especially when it can be (depending on the situation) inconvenient. I have a pretty good idea of how much of what I should be eating now, so I eat it and monitor my weight trend. I cut back a little when I think I'm gaining, but don't worry too much about it. I add in a little when I think I'm losing more than I want.0 -
Other than alcohol I have the rest of my diet under control and no longer need to log so I stopped. It was driving everybody crazy at restaurants and such. If I want to have cocktails at night and wine with dinner I just need to run enough miles to compensate. The scale is my barometer on how I am doing now.2
-
I found that after a year of tracking everything I ate, I had learned enough about portions, etc, and I had changed my relationship with food enough that I could stop tracking and maintain my new, lower weight. I was able to assess my activity level for the day and realistically recall what I had already eaten, and make a smart choice based on that. My weight fluctuated by a pound or two sometimes, but I didn't regain the lost weight until a very high-stress period in my life when I basically ended up making a conscious choice to stop being healthy and mindful.
However, I find that I can't LOSE weight without tracking. I guess there's not enough wiggle room in my "losing" calorie allowance to cope with my brain's estimating capabilities.
That said, you should definitely continue your experiment. It may work for you. Maybe you will find that you lose weight more slowly, but your mood is better and you are happier. Maybe it will fail and you will resume tracking. But try it for a few weeks, maybe a month. Either way you will learn something about yourself and your body.2 -
I have to track - I am not good at estimating or eyeballing and I can easily justify whatever it is I am eating by saying oh this is just a small piece/bite/portion/taste etc and then boom! - its all gone.4
-
I never weighed my food and logged for about month before giving up on it. I lost all my weight via intuitive eating. Some part of my mind might tell me to eat pizza for every meal but my intuition never did. I'm pretty smart. I know the difference. Been in maintenance for over a year now, still using intuitive eating.4
-
I think about stopping weighing and logging ALL the time, but i never do.. I think I'm addicted i haven't missed a day in nearly 3 years!
It's probably because i don't hate it, i quite enjoy it. If the day ever comes when it starts to feel like a dreaded chore, i may revisit giving it a break then.7 -
I feel I only log meals that I feel will be a ton of calories. Usually the bigger meals I measure out but the little small things like if i eat an apple or some broccoli not so much .. so far I lost 2.2lbs doing this since last Monday and weighing today.0
-
I find, for me, logging takes the stress out of eating. When I try to eat mindfully or intuitively I either eat way under or over my calorie needs. And I overanalyze every bite I put in my mouth until I just decide it's easier not to eat, or I block it out of my mind and binge. Knowing where I'm at with my calories lets me relax, balance my macros and know when it's OK to indulge without guilt or anxiety. I'm also really bad at judging portions, so the weighing and measuring relieves that stress too.3
-
I'm not great at intuitive eating. I'm also bad at eyeballing portions. I still take breaks from counting and logging on MFP though. I believe it is good for mental health to take a break every once in awhile. And that break could mean one day or one week, etc depending on your emotional/mental needs. When I do take a break, I just eyeball food and keep the general number in my head. I like logging because its not too disruptive to my life to quick put a bowl on the scale, and weigh out the portion. Then I can conciously choose "Yes, I have the calories to eat two portions" rather than accidently eat more than one and worry about it constantly.
Good luck! Mental health is just as important as physical health.3 -
I alternated between calorie counting and intuitive eating for 10 months and lost 40 lbs. After calorie counting for a while my appetite shrinks so I can switch to intuitive eating. When my weight loss stalls (because my appetite has slowly grown) I go back to calorie counting.2
-
If I could successfully intuitive eat, then I wouldn't be fat in the first place lol.
Calorie counting for me.8 -
Most of the time, tracking neither bothers me nor stresses me, and it is the only thing in 40 years of trying that has enabled me to lose a substantial amount of weight and keep it off more than a year (three-plus years, actually), so I haven't been tempted to try intuitive eating.
But if tracking is causing you problems, trying some other approach and seeing if you can make it work seems reasonable. I hope it works out for you.3 -
I don't weigh and log on holiday, but when I'm home I do it every day. I just log loosely, in a spreadsheet, as a natural part of my meal planning. It makes me more mindful. Not obsessive. In fact, it helps me not think too much about food. Thinking about what you eat is good, but thinking too much is not good. Do whatever make you think about food as much as you need, but not too much. If you can eat appropriately for your needs without logging, then don't log. If you need logging to eat appropriately, log.0
-
I tried intuïtive eating for the first month of my diet. Since I eat nearly the same thing everyday it was nice to get a feel for myself of what my body told me I needed and changed it up whenever I needed to. When I logged it for the first time yesterday it was nearly precisely the amount of calories mfp tells me to eat (1200 kcalories net) and high fat+protein, low on the carbs.
I think it would get easier having a more varied diet and do this the more experienced you are.1 -
I think its a good thing if you can do it. I have been logging for 2 years. Logging helps me stay within the range I want to eat in. I am pretty sure I can eat intuitively at this point but I think I would allow myself to over do it.2
-
im too ocd, and actually enjoy being precise but if you're able to 'eye ball' it and maintain your weight/goals then great, whatever works for you. only time i don't really log everything is during the major holidays and let go a little bit... but that's like 2-3 days in the year.2
-
Depends how long you have been at this. If you are a pro at mentally calculating calories, then go for it. If you have done it a month, then no. I used MFP over a year and even now I can calculate calories pretty well for most foods. However, I do like using it as a meal planning guide so I can stay within my calories for breakfast and lunch. Too many "what ifs" can occur if I don't.2
-
This is actually something I got really curious about for a while and looked into some research on it. it's really fascinating, and it definitely can do well, but there are a lot of 'if you do it right' addendum, you know? So, what I know.
1. In animals that have been tested - and I'm going to presume us, too - the body does seem to make connections between foods and what the body needs. You crave the markers of calorie dense foods when you are low in calories, for example (sweet and fatty/high carb foods are usually higher in calories, so we'll crave these things). We will tend to crave certain foods associated with certain nutrients, too. I experienced this myself when I was craving this one food like woah, and found out later it was very high in the one nutrient I was missing in my diet.
But here's the problem: our bodies have to be ABLE to distinguish what we need from what foods we eat. There was an interesting study years and years ago with very small toddlers who were given foods to eat. One group got foods mixed together - like breads, pasta dishes with veggies, that sort of thing. One group got single ingredients - apples, oatmeal, etc...
The group that had one ingredient foods pretty quickly started eating a nutritionally complete diet for the week (but not every day, interestingly - they would tend to binge on a few things for a day or two, and then binge on another set of things the next day or so, etc...). But the one that had the foods mixed did not - they tended toward the most fatty or sweet items.
It was speculated that whatever cues the body uses to figure out what food gives us what nutrients (flavors, scents, whatever), it can get confused when you have a lot of foods with similar tastes and scents that are giving us completely different nutrients. so it was also speculated that if we want to let our bodies 'tell' us what we need to eat, then eating more single ingredients and less mixed foods might be of use. So maybe more things mixed into salads or other dishes where the individual flavors and smells might be more prominent, perhaps?
2. Your body typically doesn't want to lose weight. So when you start to eat too few calories, most bodies will make you more hungry so you'll start to eat enough calories to maintain your current weight, whatever it is. Not every body does this, but most do. So if you eat 'instinctively,' it can be helpful to remember that your body instinctively is made to NOT lose calories, because that typically means famine and/or starvation, and the body reacts in order to survive and not starve to death, you know? So feeling a little hungry is a good thing, if you are losing weight, you know?
3. An interesting study on food and sight - people seemed programmed to eat more food if there is more food in front of them. This seems common in many animals, and would make sense when you think about how often animals are storing 'extra' food in their bodies, rather than having some way of storing it elsewhere. So putting less food on the table and on the plate can help our minds pay attention to how hungry we are rather than how much food we 'need' to eat because it's there. So we will be more likely to stop at a good amount rather than overeat. :-)4 -
I've been on a break since January. Regained quite a bit of weight, although my jeans size has not changed at all. No regrets but it is time to get back to work.0
-
This content has been removed.
-
I lost fifty pounds when I quit dieting and started intuitive eating. I was eating simply terrifyingly large amounts of food. The stark irrationality of that experience still breaks my brain. All those years I spent listening to whatever the latest diet expert said rather than to the cues of my own body - decades of doing what I was supposed to do to lose weight and never succeeding turned all on its ear by doing the thing that sounds wrong "eat what you want, as much as you want, whenever you want" by the trick of "paying attention to the signals you get from your body, using them to define 'what you want'".0
-
I often take breaks from calorie counting as my goal is to be able to keep my weight steady without counting calories. I can say in terms of weight loss, I have lost weight eating without logging, but I had A LOT of weight to lose so it wasn't very hard. Now if I do it, I'm more likely to keep my weight the same not really lose any. I took a MFP break for a few months last summer and I did lose 5 lbs but that was more due to the crazy heat and lack of wanting to eat anything but salad.
I'm 28 weeks pregnant and I rarely log and my weight is on target so thats good. What I do find is key regardless is to listen to your body. When I crave fruits I eat them, I craved kefir the last few weeks so I've had that.
The hard part for me is listening to when I'm full. My body sends clear signals that my brain likes to over ride. However I find the longer I just eat without counting the better I am at stopping when I'm full.
In the end you have to try it. If your not happy, go back to calorie counting, or find a way to mix in both.
0 -
I didn't count/log for around 4 years, I gained and lost weight many times during that time( on purpose).
I came back to this site with the goal of getting leaner than I've been the past 4 years, I still log only 60% of the time.
Counting is not necessary for maintenance. Only stepping on the scale once a week or so and making changes based on those results works. But you need good self control, I would say better self control than if you count.0 -
Tracking was useful and very educational (portion sizes, where my calories were coming come etc..) but I was never going to do it for life.
You can be calorie aware without having to calorie count. I track my weight trend and eat according to my needs. More conscious eating rather than intuitive eating in my case, unfortunately I generally want more than I actually need.0 -
I stopped logging about 9 months ago. I rarely weigh myself either. I go by how I look. I've gained a few pounds, but still look about the same. If I wanted to cut the fluff however, I would go back to logging. I will also occasionally log a day here or there just to make sure I'm still doing ok. I keep a mental tally of my protein.0
-
Just because you're not tracking it doesn't mean your regular structure of eating goes out the window. You had a structure that kept you in a deficit when you were counting, continue with it just without the counting. Simples.3
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions