Speed / time or distance confused
rabbyduby
Posts: 123 Member
Hi, is it better to exercise for speed, time or distance? If i walk on the treadmill for 60 minutes a day, should i aim to do more miles in that 60 minutes or should i be more concerned with walking at a slower pace which would give me less miles but higher incline to burn more calories. Please help
0
Replies
-
Speed x Time= Distance0
-
Which do you prefer? Personally I'd mix it up, some days I do hill intervals, sometimes go for speed and others go for longer distance but slower, it all helps with building endurance/speed2
-
depends what your fitness goals are?0
-
deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal0 -
I am walking increasing my distance at the minute and I am walking for weight loss.... its working slowly but surely1
-
So calorie burn then.
As intense as you can make it that still allows you to do it the next day for the time available.
If you can't jog and only walk, then incline to cause that, but keep the pace up.1 -
Walking is complicated because calorie burn actually can change significantly with speed, unlike running. Once you get faster than 4mph, you get closer to running calorie burns, which are approx 2x calories burned at a slower walk.
Assuming you're walking <= 4mph at both slower and faster speeds, you burn equal calories for equal distance and incline. In that case, if the slower speed allows you to walk an equal or greater distance at an equal or greater incline, then the slower speed will burn more calories.1 -
deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal
Calorie deficit then1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal
Calorie deficit then
I'm already eating at deficit. Thank you0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal
Calorie deficit then
I'm already eating at deficit. Thank you
Then do whatever exercise you enjoy if you have no fitness goals.0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal
Calorie deficit then
I'm already eating at deficit. Thank you
I think what was meant that you are trying to burn calories to be in a deficit. That you otherwise have no fitness goals. The response you blew off has little to do with how you are eating.0 -
TavistockToad wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »depends what your fitness goals are?
weightloss is my goal
Calorie deficit then
I'm already eating at deficit. Thank you
I think the key here is that exercise for calorie expenditure is unlikely to be sustainable unless you actually enjoy it. To me, the prospect of an hour on a treadmill sounds absolute purgatory.
The benefits of exercise are improving your aerobic capacity, and developing your endurance. If you're only interested in weight loss, and not on developing your fitness, then why put yourself through it?3 -
Distance is a hypothetical construct. The body knows duration and intensity, it does not care about distance.
This goes triple for working out on a treadmill. Workload intensity (and calorie burn) is determined by workload, not by miles. Whether you achieve a workload by running at a certain speed, or by a combination of walking speed and incline, the calorie burn will be the same. In this case, the actual "miles" travelled is completely irrelevant.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 427 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions