No weight loss
jamontagne
Posts: 115
So - I've been "dieting" for years - maintaining a 1200ish cal diet and exercising more often than not. But I have only lost about 10 pounds in the last year! I'm trying to loss 20 pounds - which would put me at 120lbs (the higher end of my healthy weight range), but I just can't seem to move the scale.
Any ideas? I think I might need to increase my calories ... but I am soooo afraid I will gain if I do that! Also, I started taking medication about 3 mos ago that causes weight gaim - but luckily i haven't gained (havent lost either).
I'm looking for something specific ~ how many calories should I consume, what foods should i eat and when (i.e. carbs only in morning?), etc. I have been going to the gym with my fiance 4-5 times per week for the last 3 weeks - so exercise is definately not lacking. I'm just so frustrated and I don't know what to do anymore. Please help :grumble:
Any ideas? I think I might need to increase my calories ... but I am soooo afraid I will gain if I do that! Also, I started taking medication about 3 mos ago that causes weight gaim - but luckily i haven't gained (havent lost either).
I'm looking for something specific ~ how many calories should I consume, what foods should i eat and when (i.e. carbs only in morning?), etc. I have been going to the gym with my fiance 4-5 times per week for the last 3 weeks - so exercise is definately not lacking. I'm just so frustrated and I don't know what to do anymore. Please help :grumble:
0
Replies
-
eat your exercise calories0
-
eat your exercise calories
^^ THIS ^^0 -
Not sure what your diet looks like but try adding fiber. And make sure you're drinking enough water.0
-
I am the same!
Gonna try and eat 90 per cent of my exercise calories adn see if it makes a diff0 -
Track your sodium - make sure you are not sabotaging yourself there.0
-
How certain are you that your assumed 1200 calorie intake is accurate? By that, I mean are you using a food scale to increase accuracy?0
-
If you are not already eating back the calories you are burning, as many other people have already said, you wont lose weight. What happens when you are already eating so few calories and then you work out your sending your body into a starvation mode where your metabolism slows down and you are storing everything you consume. I recomend you see a Registered Dietitian who can calculate your calorie needs and can tell you if you need to increase fiber, protein or other nutrients. You can find and RD in your area by going to the American Dietetic Association website at eatright.org0
-
The starvation mode does not work like that. It's a common misconception.
Just ask any successful anorexic.
Being facetious for the most part, but adaptive thermogenesis (the real name for the starvation mode) does not cause you to store calories in the face of a deficit. It simply stands to reduce daily energy cost via a number of mechanisms. And metabolism doesn't crash to a degree where an extreme deficit turns into s surplus.0 -
I use a scale and am strict on ensuring my calorie count is accurate
I drink between 8-12 glasses of water a day (generally 3-4 24oz bottles)
I eat most of my exercise calories
So ... still looking for some serious in-depth answers if anyone has them :ohwell:0 -
I use a scale and am strict on ensuring my calorie count is accurate
I drink between 8-12 glasses of water a day (generally 3-4 24oz bottles)
I eat most of my exercise calories
So ... still looking for some serious in-depth answers if anyone has them :ohwell:
So do you eat 1200 calories per day? Or do you eat 1200 + the calories you expended exercising?0 -
I use a scale and am strict on ensuring my calorie count is accurate
I drink between 8-12 glasses of water a day (generally 3-4 24oz bottles)
I eat most of my exercise calories
So ... still looking for some serious in-depth answers if anyone has them :ohwell:
So do you eat 1200 calories per day? Or do you eat 1200 + the calories you expended exercising?
1200 regularly + about 90% of exercise cals (if I exercise)0 -
I use a scale and am strict on ensuring my calorie count is accurate
I drink between 8-12 glasses of water a day (generally 3-4 24oz bottles)
I eat most of my exercise calories
So ... still looking for some serious in-depth answers if anyone has them :ohwell:
So do you eat 1200 calories per day? Or do you eat 1200 + the calories you expended exercising?
1200 regularly + about 90% of exercise cals (if I exercise)
If you had to come up with an average, how much are you expending via exercise? A lot of people overestimate their energy expenditure and therefore wind up eating too much when they eat their exercise calories back.0 -
I use a scale and am strict on ensuring my calorie count is accurate
I drink between 8-12 glasses of water a day (generally 3-4 24oz bottles)
I eat most of my exercise calories
So ... still looking for some serious in-depth answers if anyone has them :ohwell:
So do you eat 1200 calories per day? Or do you eat 1200 + the calories you expended exercising?
1200 regularly + about 90% of exercise cals (if I exercise)
If you had to come up with an average, how much are you expending via exercise? A lot of people overestimate their energy expenditure and therefore wind up eating too much when they eat their exercise calories back.
I go by MFP - so roughly 500 cals for a 1hr hard workout at gym0 -
So you said you workout 4 days per week I think. So in 7 days your intake might be 3 days a 1200 and 4 days at 1650 (1200 + 90% of your 500 calories expended). That totals 10,200 calories for the week.
Your maintenance, if you're 140 lbs, is likely around 1800. So that means your weekly energy expenditure is likely around 12,600.
That gives you a weekly deficit of 2400 calories. If you lost nothing but fat while in a deficit, which isn't the case, you'd be losing roughly 2/3 of a pound of fat each week.
But you have to understand... this assumes that your metabolism is functioning optimally. If you've lost a significant amount of weight in the past... your energy expenditure is likely lower would be expected.
It also assumes that your energy intake and expenditure estimates are close to accurate. I've been doing this a long time working with a lot of people. I've been researching the topic for a lot of years too. It's very evident that we such at accurately tracking calorie intake... chances are better than not that you're underestimating calorie intake and overestimating calorie expenditure, thus putting you closer to maintenance than you'd assume.
You're working with a relatively small wiggle room so it's very easy to hit a mark that's closer to maintenance than you realize.0 -
I appreciate the help! :smooched: So ~ what d you suggest? lower the intake or up the exercise? either of which will be very difficult at this point.
Or should I just try being more dilligent about my measurements for another week or so and see what happends?0 -
To go along with Stroutman81's line of thinking...You can also try wearing a monitor. I have a Polaris that keeps track of my total calories burned, tells me when I am burning "fat" calories, when I switch into Fitness mode and tracks the Percent of fat calroies burned for the course of a work out. I absolutely love it! It not only "keeps me honest" on how many calories I am burning for a given task but helps me to track how many Fat calories I am burning, which is my goal . I am a pretty active person and find I push too hard sometimes and jump quickly into "firness" mode where I increase my cardio and build muscle (both of which are excellent goals and help burn calories long term) but I personally need to reduce my body fat percentage in relation to my overall weight and the Polaris definately helps. Good luck!0
-
Track your sodium - make sure you are not sabotaging yourself there.
sodium has nothing to do with losingv weight.0 -
I am not sure which medication you are taking, but there are several that are notorious for causing weight gain, and if you taking one of those, you have probably read the stories of people who gained up to 30 lbs in as little as 3-6 months while in treatment.
Since you are eating and working out as you have described, it sounds to me like you've found a way to keep the extra medication pounds at bay -- something most people seem unable to accomplish. It could be that you won't lose any more weight, but you should be very relieved that you are not gaining. Weight loss might not occur while you are taking medication, and you may have to continue your hard workouts and strict calorie counting just to avoid gaining -- but that is a great accomplishment, given that many people despite diet and exercise cannot seem to avoid putting on weight on certain meds.
I would say, be kind to yourself and patient, and don't obsess terribly about how or when you will reach your goal. Just realize that you are doing everything humanly possible, and know that it will eventually pay off, if not in pounds lost, at least in pounds not gained.0 -
Or should I just try being more dilligent about my measurements for another week or so and see what happends?
This.
And not for a week. For 2-4 weeks in order to appropriately assess things.0 -
To go along with Stroutman81's line of thinking...You can also try wearing a monitor. I have a Polaris that keeps track of my total calories burned, tells me when I am burning "fat" calories, when I switch into Fitness mode and tracks the Percent of fat calroies burned for the course of a work out. I absolutely love it! It not only "keeps me honest" on how many calories I am burning for a given task but helps me to track how many Fat calories I am burning, which is my goal . I am a pretty active person and find I push too hard sometimes and jump quickly into "firness" mode where I increase my cardio and build muscle (both of which are excellent goals and help burn calories long term) but I personally need to reduce my body fat percentage in relation to my overall weight and the Polaris definately helps. Good luck!
I wouldn't put a lot of faith on the substrate utilization assumptions that the monitor is making. I'd have to hear exactly how it's working... but I'd imagine it's basing it solely on percentage of maximum heart rate and that wouldn't be at all accurate.
In addition, even if it were, the fuel substrate used during exercise is of little importance when it comes to fat loss. Think of it like this, as a percentage we use fat for fuel mostly. So why not relax ourselves to fat loss?
I'd focus more on calories in vs. calories out.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions