Question

MISSYLOU143
MISSYLOU143 Posts: 22 Member
rwmtvwm3vw2u.png

Replies

  • This content has been removed.
  • unfilterednate
    unfilterednate Posts: 905 Member
    Too much we don't know, diet, etc.. if you have a carb heavy diet I can see a way that you won't lose weight but.. like I said I don't know enough..
  • aeloine
    aeloine Posts: 2,163 Member
    Chit-chat isn't the best place for your post. Refer to the "general weight loss" thread you created for some possible answers.
  • jcstevens86
    jcstevens86 Posts: 3,338 Member
    aeloine wrote: »
    Chit-chat isn't the best place for your post. Refer to the "general weight loss" thread you created for some possible answers.

    Beg to differ some of us can play and be serious as well
  • jcstevens86
    jcstevens86 Posts: 3,338 Member
    I agree with @unfilterednate....to much we dont know to actually give a good answer
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    No this is not accurate... HRM's should not be worn all day like this, only during steady state cardio exercise.
  • aeloine
    aeloine Posts: 2,163 Member
    aeloine wrote: »
    Chit-chat isn't the best place for your post. Refer to the "general weight loss" thread you created for some possible answers.

    Beg to differ some of us can play and be serious as well

    Why so serious?
  • Motorsheen
    Motorsheen Posts: 20,508 Member
    hellvee wrote: »
    what engine factory do you work in?

    This.

    I gotta believe that a Cummings Diesel will consume considerably more calories than some lil' rice burner.
  • aeloine
    aeloine Posts: 2,163 Member
    Motorsheen wrote: »
    hellvee wrote: »
    what engine factory do you work in?

    This.

    I gotta believe that a Cummings Diesel will consume considerably more calories than some lil' rice burner.

    Only this if she's actually lifting the Diesels tho.

    There are buttons that do that now.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    HRMs aren't designed to be worn all day like an activity tracker...it's not accurate. A HRM is somewhat accurate for estimating energy expenditure during a steady state aerobic activity because that's the way the algorithm is set up. Anything under or over the aerobic zone is going to get you an estimate that is less and less and less accurate.
  • jcstevens86
    jcstevens86 Posts: 3,338 Member
    aeloine wrote: »
    aeloine wrote: »
    Chit-chat isn't the best place for your post. Refer to the "general weight loss" thread you created for some possible answers.

    Beg to differ some of us can play and be serious as well

    Why so serious?

    Ummmm im not
  • Motorsheen
    Motorsheen Posts: 20,508 Member
    aeloine wrote: »
    Motorsheen wrote: »
    hellvee wrote: »
    what engine factory do you work in?

    This.

    I gotta believe that a Cummings Diesel will consume considerably more calories than some lil' rice burner.

    Only this if she's actually lifting the Diesels tho.

    There are buttons that do that now.

    maybe the buttons are broken?
  • MISSYLOU143
    MISSYLOU143 Posts: 22 Member
    Sorry guys I wrote it on 3 things because I wanted an answer and didn't know I'd get a lot of replys haha next time I'll just do one..
    engine factory so lifting parts.. oil pans, damper pulleys, multi airs, bolts, caps, head covers etc lots of different parts but yeah I guess the hrm is only good for actual workouts not all day use and my diet consist of protein every few hrs at work.. I'll have hard boiled eggs, two slices of bacon, chicken, a meal replacement shake yogurt trying to make better choices and trying to stay with healthier choices .. just didn't know if 1,200 was enough when I'd get home I'd be starving so I upped my calorie intake to 1,500 on days I work