50% carbs 30% fat 20% protein - thoughts ?
Beewhatever44
Posts: 14 Member
Hi community ! I am soing the above macros and am having good inotial success ... bery excited to see the scales come down. Does the above seem sustainable long term? All carbs are healthy choices, paleo is followed and I fast each night from 6pm to 10am the next day. Anyone doing a similar thing? Appreciate you sharing your success stories or any advice. Have a great day! Feel free to add me.
0
Replies
-
Sorry for the typos !!0
-
MFPs macros are fine.
or tweak if you desire... i work better with more fat personally.2 -
That's MFP's default, and believed to be a good general guideline. I personally upped fat and lowered carbs while dieting, but you don't have to do that. Many people stick to the default during weightloss, and many don't even track macros.
You lose weight according to calorie deficit, not according to macro split.
What's important is that what you're doing, is sustainable long term. We can make predictions, but only you can know for sure. A diet and meal schedule that fits your preferences and work, famly and social life - some kind of structure, that at the same time allows for flexibility - is sustainable. My prediction is that eating paleo and "healthy carbs" is not going to be sustainable.6 -
The only thing that matters for weight loss is having a calorie deficit. If those macros, paleo, and IF help you achieve that deficit, then good job!2
-
I started at that and found I naturally was eating less carbs and more fat. I changed mine to 40/35/25 which seems good for me right now. I eat a very balanced diet. If anything I'd like to slightly lower my fats since I'm also high cholesterol/triglyceride and raise protein.1
-
Thank you all for taking the time to comment - i have more insight now - terrific !!!3
-
There is no universal split let alone one that is superior to all others for individual weight loss. Everyone has to find what works for them. What keeps you within your calculated daily caloric limits. What keeps you happy and moving forward without major stumbling blocks/obstacles.
My splits are vastly different from yours but that is because they are mine and work for me, and me alone.2 -
Thanks !!! Sustainability and what works for me is a fab tip0
-
Yeah that is perfectly sustainable (dependant on your actual food choices and total amount of calories of course, you still need basic nutrition).2
-
Beewhatever44 wrote: »Hi community ! I am soing the above macros and am having good inotial success ... bery excited to see the scales come down. Does the above seem sustainable long term? All carbs are healthy choices, paleo is followed and I fast each night from 6pm to 10am the next day. Anyone doing a similar thing? Appreciate you sharing your success stories or any advice. Have a great day! Feel free to add me.
I am doing the ketogenic way of eating..20 carbs 20 protein 60% fat. Been on it for 15 dsys. So far so good. I think your total carbs at 50% may be a bit high..6 -
Yes it may be high but its all veges and low calories ( for me !). I will keep that in mind tho. Thanks for the tip poochie0
-
Are you doing much endurance sport? I run a lot, and MFP tells me I ate 53% carbs in the past 7 days, which I needed. Carbs give you easily accessible energy for endurance.1
-
poochie_loo wrote: »Beewhatever44 wrote: »Hi community ! I am soing the above macros and am having good inotial success ... bery excited to see the scales come down. Does the above seem sustainable long term? All carbs are healthy choices, paleo is followed and I fast each night from 6pm to 10am the next day. Anyone doing a similar thing? Appreciate you sharing your success stories or any advice. Have a great day! Feel free to add me.
I am doing the ketogenic way of eating..20 carbs 20 protein 60% fat. Been on it for 15 dsys. So far so good. I think your total carbs at 50% may be a bit high..
50% is well within the recommended consumption of carbs a day according to the World Health Organisation which recommends carbs between 45%-65%. The macro ratios given my BMP are healthy for most people and as they are working well for you and are sustainable then I'd continue down that path. For many keto is anything but sustainable long term. It becomes just another fad diet for many of those that are on without medical reasons.5 -
poochie_loo wrote: »Beewhatever44 wrote: »Hi community ! I am soing the above macros and am having good inotial success ... bery excited to see the scales come down. Does the above seem sustainable long term? All carbs are healthy choices, paleo is followed and I fast each night from 6pm to 10am the next day. Anyone doing a similar thing? Appreciate you sharing your success stories or any advice. Have a great day! Feel free to add me.
I am doing the ketogenic way of eating..20 carbs 20 protein 60% fat. Been on it for 15 dsys. So far so good. I think your total carbs at 50% may be a bit high..
It isn’t. Look at the blue zone countries who eat even more carbs than that.3 -
Beewhatever44 wrote: »Yes it may be high but its all veges and low calories ( for me !). I will keep that in mind tho. Thanks for the tip poochie
Many people tend to think that there is a perfect diet somewhere, that the trick is to just find it, and that they can and should stick to it, even though it's hard. But that's not how it works. A diet can be "perfect" nutritionally, but if you don't stick to it, it won't work. It's the opposite - any diet that provides a calorie deficit, will "work", the question is whether you'll stick to it.2 -
Macros really should be based on grams per lb of lean body mass, not percentages. So what are your stats (height, weight, age) and how many calories are you eating? Are you also exercising?2
-
When I started MFP I was at a lower cal level (1250 -- I added 50 because I didn't want to get the red for eating a few calories over 1200), and so I thought 50-30-20 was too low in protein (62.5 g), given that I was trying to lose. I upped my protein to around 100 g, which came to between 30 and 35, and changed my macros to 40 (carbs)-30-30, which worked really well for me when I was losing (even when I started exercising more and realized I should be eating more calories). But it's really pretty individual.
So is meal timing, btw -- cool if eating only between 10 am and 6 pm works for you, but I enjoy having breakfast and dinner and eating at home when possible, and my schedule is such that I leave kind of early and don't get home 'til late, so I tend to eat at 6 am, 12, and 9 pm (sometimes later, but for me also no snacking) and that worked well with my preferences and schedule. It's personal. (I mention this because the whole IF thing and not eating after some time are both things that tend to be pushed currently but are not necessary.)2 -
kommodevaran wrote: »Beewhatever44 wrote: »Yes it may be high but its all veges and low calories ( for me !). I will keep that in mind tho. Thanks for the tip poochie
Many people tend to think that there is a perfect diet somewhere, that the trick is to just find it, and that they can and should stick to it, even though it's hard. But that's not how it works. A diet can be "perfect" nutritionally, but if you don't stick to it, it won't work. It's the opposite - any diet that provides a calorie deficit, will "work", the question is whether you'll stick to it.
This is really good advice.1
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions