How do you know daily calorie intake is right?

dualvans
dualvans Posts: 51 Member
edited November 23 in Health and Weight Loss
I’ve been told by several people that my daily 1,200 calories is way too low for me.

It does make me wonder why I’m still hungry some evenings or is this cuz it’s a new pattern of my eating habits?

Mind you, I do feel it’s working somewhat as when I restarted MFP program, I was at 198lbs and now at 188.2 as of today’s weigh check in.

Someone actually said I should see a Dietican to really ensure 1200 is correct for me. But what say you?

Replies

  • malibu927
    malibu927 Posts: 17,562 Member
    If you’re still hungry at night, I would concur that it’s too low. If you’re set to lose 2 pounds per week, try dropping your goal to 1.5 pounds per week and see if the extra calories help.
  • cathipa
    cathipa Posts: 2,991 Member
    1200 is low for most. Did MFP give you this calorie goal or did you just choose it randomly?
  • amyepdx
    amyepdx Posts: 750 Member
    Log your stats in MFP, set it to lose 1 lb a week and eat that amount. Add back any exercise cals and assess after a month. That will give you the best number for you.
  • doittoitgirl
    doittoitgirl Posts: 157 Member
    If you set your goal for 2lbs per week and sedentary or lightly active, I've found MFP recommends 1200cals often when it isn't really necessary. MFP tells me that should be my goal as well. But I have had no problem losing 2lbs per week on 1500-1600 cals and I don't feel like I'm starving at night or midday. I weigh about the same as you as well, though I don't know your height. And I'm admittedly pretty sedentary during my day.
  • donharkrn
    donharkrn Posts: 187 Member
    If you're at 198, 2 pounds of fat loss per week is a safe and achievable goal. If you're in a deficit, I think hunger is inevitable. Sadly, most of us have bodies that "like" the extra fluff. I'm in that category. If you are happy with you're results thus far, I say keep it up. The one thing I might recommend is ensuring you are getting enough protein in your diet. That will keep the emphasis on fat loss and may even help with those hunger pangs.
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    What’s your height, weight, and activity level?

    This ^^
  • vingogly
    vingogly Posts: 1,785 Member
    edited January 2018
    I use this calculator to determine calorie levels for losing and maintaining. It's a nice way to check what the effect of changing activity level or losing weight would be on your calorie goals.

    http://www.calculator.net/calorie-calculator.html

    If you're hungry in the evenings, you might try what I do: go lighter on lunch and snacks during the day, and save them for the evenings.
  • kimny72
    kimny72 Posts: 16,011 Member
    edited January 2018
    donharkrn wrote: »
    If you're at 198, 2 pounds of fat loss per week is a safe and achievable goal. If you're in a deficit, I think hunger is inevitable. Sadly, most of us have bodies that "like" the extra fluff. I'm in that category. If you are happy with you're results thus far, I say keep it up. The one thing I might recommend is ensuring you are getting enough protein in your diet. That will keep the emphasis on fat loss and may even help with those hunger pangs.

    Depending on her height and activity level, 2 lbs per week could be incredibly difficult. If she is 5'5 and sedentary, her TDEE at 198 is only around 2000 cals. To lose 2 lbs per week, she would have to eat 1000 cals, which is not safe or realistic. Even 1200 is a struggle for many women.
  • Nottaway1
    Nottaway1 Posts: 26 Member
    My scales guide me. I aim for 2lbs/wk and adjust to meet that goal.
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    edited January 2018
    1200 is too low for most people. Having your height would help and also how active you are in general.
    While its true that we can expect to feel hunger when we cut calories intially, if we know we are giving our body enough fuel then we know we can ignore some feelings of hunger.
  • Jingsi84
    Jingsi84 Posts: 126 Member
    It irks me when people say 1200 is too low without knowing age and height. I am old, short and sedentary with a 1200 goal to lose only .8lbs per week at 145lbs. It’s not too low for many people.
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    edited January 2018
    Jingsi84 wrote: »
    It irks me when people say 1200 is too low without knowing age and height. I am old, short and sedentary with a 1200 goal to lose only .8lbs per week at 145lbs. It’s not too low for many people.

    But I also am short and quite old? (5ft 2 - 48 and if I wanted to lose I'd eat 1700-1800 cals to lose 0.5lb a week, I'm only lightly active)..you're losing almost 1lb a week so that means you could eat more if you wanted and lose a bit slower. I did say 1200 is too low for MOST people.
  • Jingsi84
    Jingsi84 Posts: 126 Member
    Wasn’t trying to slight you @RunRutheeRun. “1200 is too low” is a common refrain on MFP and it is annoying because I could be safely losing 1 lb/week but keep at .8 as not to go below the 1200 minimum. So for us sedentary shorties 1200 is even higher than we’d like to eat to lose at the rate of our taller brethren.
  • dualvans
    dualvans Posts: 51 Member
    edited January 2018
    OP here, thanks all. I tried to respond to multi quote some of you, but it wouldn’t let me.

    My full stats when I restarted as myself as 40 year old, 5’3”, 198lbs pretty sedate lifestyle to lightly active, 2lbs a week. Exercise 2-3 a week with 1 mile jogging on my off gym days.

    Current stats is; 5’3”, 188lbs, lightly active to active, 2lbs a week. Would changing from 2lbs to 1.5lb help more? I also increased my gym days to 3x a week consistently.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,454 Member
    I had to find a calorie level that worked for me.

    OP, set your Goals to "Lose 1 pound per week" like the Goal Wizard suggests when yo set your goals. Use a realistic Activity Level. Just look at the choices it gives and be honest.

    THEN: log your food and exercise every day for 4-6 weeks. Use the same exercise calculations every time; I always ate all the exercise calories and it has worked for me, some people use half that - just pick one and stick to it for this next 4-6 weeks.

    At the end of the 4-6 weeks, take a look back and see what your weight trend was. Adjust as needed. No one here can give you a set number, it's your experiment to run. It's what we all have to do.
  • estherdragonbat
    estherdragonbat Posts: 5,283 Member
    dualvans wrote: »
    OP here, thanks all. I tried to respond to multi quote some of you, but it wouldn’t let me.

    My full stats when I restarted as myself as 40 year old, 5’3”, 198lbs pretty sedate lifestyle to lightly active, 2lbs a week. Exercise 2-3 a week with 1 mile jogging on my off gym days.

    Current stats is; 5’3”, 188lbs, lightly active to active, 2lbs a week. Would changing from 2lbs to 1.5lb help more? I also increased my gym days to 3x a week consistently.

    We're the same height and I'm turning 46 next month. When I weighed what you do, I was on a base 1380 to lose a pound a week. I also exercise(d) 2-3 hours daily—long walks at a moderate pace, light dumbbells 3 days a week and eat back 50% of calories burned. So, in practice, I was eating more like 1700-1900 and losing 1-1.5/week on average.

    I'm now on 1450 base and trying to lose 1/2-lb a week as I close in on goal.
  • cathipa
    cathipa Posts: 2,991 Member
    dualvans wrote: »
    OP here, thanks all. I tried to respond to multi quote some of you, but it wouldn’t let me.

    My full stats when I restarted as myself as 40 year old, 5’3”, 198lbs pretty sedate lifestyle to lightly active, 2lbs a week. Exercise 2-3 a week with 1 mile jogging on my off gym days.

    Current stats is; 5’3”, 188lbs, lightly active to active, 2lbs a week. Would changing from 2lbs to 1.5lb help more? I also increased my gym days to 3x a week consistently.

    You could change it, but also remember that MFP sets your calories based on the information you provide. If you said you were sedentary and received 1200 calories they are assuming if you exercise you will also be eating back some of those calories as well. Since you are currently exercising this is probably why you are more hungry on just 1200 calories a day.
This discussion has been closed.