So why can't I eat only 1000 calories a day?

I've been doing this for twenty days now, which is not a ton, and I haven't had much of a problem staying under my calorie counts. This isn't some exercise in martyrdom, I've just kept myself very busy. Some days I've ate my target, but in general I'm averaging 200-500 calories below my already aggressive calorie goal. Why is this a bad idea? Based on what I've read, "starvation mode" seems to be a myth. Does anyone have any citations for me why I shouldn't do this?

I'm 300 pounds, 27, and a woman. I take vitamins. I prioritize protein. What's the harm?

Replies

  • hauntologie
    hauntologie Posts: 4 Member
    I'm really not meaning to be combative, but why? I'm not starving, I have plenty of fat storage, I'm eating protein and fat, I'm taking vitamins. I have more than enough fat on my body, my menstrual cycle probably isn't going anywhere. Losing muscle seems to only happen in people who are already lean. I just don't understand why it's so frowned on. Where is the research?

    Some of the things I'm going on are these:
    https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/another-look-at-metabolic-damage.html/
    https://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat-loss/lean-body-mass-maintenance-and-metabolic-rate-slowdown-qa.html
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,416 Member
    edited January 2018
    If I were you, I'd make an appointment with a Dietician and get a meal plan. It's hard to get your nutrients. Over the counter multivitamins are not a good substitute for nutrition...and I lost hair and had brittle nails and depression and fatigue at 1200 calories when I was obese. It took a couple months for that to kick in, but the hair and nails were just what I could see. I was taking vitamins. Who knows what was going on internally - but if you can notice external stuff you can bet you're causing damage.

    Why chance it?
  • aeloine
    aeloine Posts: 2,163 Member
    edited January 2018
    Gallstones (aka issues with the liver) from U.S. Department of Health and Human services. Concisely written with a bibliography of references at the bottom that you're more than welcome to check out:
    https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/gallstones/dieting

    Hair loss from nutrient deficiency from a dermatology medical journal, linked through the US National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315033/
  • wizzybeth
    wizzybeth Posts: 3,578 Member
    edited January 2018
    Not eating enough can also trigger gall bladder attacks and gall stones.

    https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/gallstones/dieting
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    The "why" at your present weight of 300 lb is impossible to recognize. I get it. The list of "why" malibu gave are things that show up after weeks and months of nutrient deprivation, which is what you do to yourself below 1200 calories.

    Mr. bodyrecomposition is not going to coach you into self-harm. Don't use him to justify harming yourself.

    As it is, you are 3 weeks into this. You are soon to experience a binge. Sorry. It happens when you starve yourself. The better way to go about this is to eat enough to be nourished and little enough that you can lose no more than 1% of your body weight each week. Right now, that's a deficit of 10,500 each week, but after you've lost 20 lb you need to recalculate your target deficit.
  • grubb1019
    grubb1019 Posts: 371 Member
    Beside the health reasons I can guarantee you it will catch up to you. If you keep under eating one day you will wake up starved and it won't leave you. I say this from experience, when you consistently eat under your goal you are setting yourself up for failure.
  • This content has been removed.
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    Sounds utterly horrible to eat that little. That's a sure fire way to fall off the wagon.

    And as others have posted already, its detrimental to your health.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.