Not eating enough?
jibbs_x
Posts: 1 Member
Hello all I think I may be eating too little calories. My app is set for 1200 a day and I have been eating between 1000-1200. This is my third week tracking my food again. I am actually not feeling overly hungry as I am trying to eat protein rich foods. I usually don’t hit the 1200 (around 1100) so I have a deficit there already. I am also riding a stationary bike 6 days a week (3 shorter periods around 30 mins) and doing a 20 minute strength work out 3 times a week (on the short bike days). My bike monitor reads calories burned usually between 400-600 but I know these things usually aren’t accurate. My Apple Watch also monitors my active calories for the day and it’s around 500-600 daily. When I add my exercise calories to this app my remaining calories spike up to 6/700. While I am trying to lose weight (I’m 182.5, 5’1 and lost 2lbs already) I want to make sure I’m not hurting myself in the process or in the long run. I don’t feel any changes in myself yet, though I know it’s early. Should I be eating around 1500? Thanks!
3
Replies
-
I would definitely eat more, 1200 gross is too little for your activity never mind 1100. Add back in some foods you've possibly been avoiding.4
-
If you're not losing weight, you're eating too much, not too little. But first figure you if you're losing weight or not. How often do you weigh yourself? How many weeks of reliable data points do you have? Is your weight just fluctuating, or is there actually a downwards trend?
Any number below maintenance is a deficit. 1000-1200 is very very little food. If you're not overly hungry, you're not eating 1000-1200 calories.
You should track your food intake correctly, hit your calorie goal, and be patient.4 -
That’s not enough calories at your activity level, and yes, it will hurt your body long-term. Are you weighing and measuring your food? When we try to eat too little our brains go into overdrive to lie to us about things like portion sizes. Even if you know it happens and to compensate, your brain will stay one step ahead.
My advice is to tell MFP you want to lose no more than 1.5lbs/week, then eat as much as it tells you to. Include the calorie adjustment from your watch in that amount! Weigh and measure everything! If your exercise is fairly new your body might retain extra water for a while, but if you’re vigilant about maintaining a reasonable caloric deficit the weight will come off. Aiming for an unreasonable one is just setting yourself up for failure.1 -
So you've lost 2 pounds was that within a week? 2? I think this will help us figure out your question. I highly doubt you're burning 400-600 calories riding on a bike for 30 minutes. I'm 5'2, and I workout frequently as well.0
-
I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.11
-
KrazyKrissyy wrote: »I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.
Please don't. First off, you're talking net not gross (I'm assuming you know the correct difference) and secondly, your friend is undereating and that doesn't need held up as "he's okay, so will you be!".8 -
VintageFeline wrote: »KrazyKrissyy wrote: »I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.
Please don't. First off, you're talking net not gross (I'm assuming you know the correct difference) and secondly, your friend is undereating and that doesn't need held up as "he's okay, so will you be!".
Yeah, his physique says otherwise lol. If he was truly undereating, he would look like a concentration camp survivor, not someone energetic and lean with a 6-pack. If you go to many other countries actually, they're food intake isn't even as high as America. It's not undereating. It's our standards. What's considered normal continues to rise over the years. This goes for weight, size, food intake, etc.13 -
KrazyKrissyy wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »KrazyKrissyy wrote: »I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.
Please don't. First off, you're talking net not gross (I'm assuming you know the correct difference) and secondly, your friend is undereating and that doesn't need held up as "he's okay, so will you be!".
Yeah, his physique says otherwise lol. If he was truly undereating, he would look like a concentration camp survivor, not someone energetic and lean with a 6-pack. If you go to many other countries actually, they're food intake isn't even as high as America. It's not undereating. It's our standards. What's considered normal continues to rise over the years. This goes for weight, size, food intake, etc.KrazyKrissyy wrote: »I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.
I also think this line of defense of a VLCD is not a good idea. Unless you are monitoring your friend's diet, which is less than 1000 net calories, according to YOU, how do you know exactly what he is eating? It's one thing to talk about yourself. Also for all we know you are 4 feet tall so, that is a good amount of calories for you. Without specifics, it means nothing.4 -
KrazyKrissyy wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »KrazyKrissyy wrote: »I got to my lowest weight on 1,000-1,200 net calories and wasn't hurt in the process. All health markers are good. My friend actually eats less than me (because of his very busy schedule along with naturally low appetite). He's shredded.
Please don't. First off, you're talking net not gross (I'm assuming you know the correct difference) and secondly, your friend is undereating and that doesn't need held up as "he's okay, so will you be!".
Yeah, his physique says otherwise lol. If he was truly undereating, he would look like a concentration camp survivor, not someone energetic and lean with a 6-pack. If you go to many other countries actually, they're food intake isn't even as high as America. It's not undereating. It's our standards. What's considered normal continues to rise over the years. This goes for weight, size, food intake, etc.
That's not true, an kinda comes off uneducated. Dude isn't eating enough if he isn't getting to 1,000-1,200 net calories (ie, less than you). That's less than my 1 year old packs away in a day.
I made that cut once on probably 1,000 or so net cals. Did I lose weight, yep. Did I have a 6 pack...yep, did I lose muscle...yep..............it took me about a year for the burn out to finally hit where I just couldn't keep going on such little fuel.
So there's probably one of two things going on here. He's eating way more than you think (or he says), or the burn out is just inevitable.6 -
Dear Posters,
I wanted to offer a brief explanation for the locking of this thread.
The forum guidelines include this item:
3. No Promotion of Unsafe Weight-Loss Techniques or Eating Disordersa) Posts intended to promote potentially unsafe or controversial weight loss products or procedures, including non-medically prescribed supplements or MLM products will be removed without warning.
b) Profiles, groups, messages, posts, or wall comments that encourage anorexia, bulimia, or very low calorie diets of any kind will be removed, and may be grounds for account deletion. This includes positive references to ana/mia, purging, or self-starving. Our goal is to provide users with the tools to achieve their weight management goals at a steady, sustainable rate. Use of the site to promote, glamorize, or achieve dangerously low levels of eating is not permitted.
c) Photos intended to glamorize extreme thinness will be deleted.
d) Those seeking support in their recovery from eating disorders are welcome at MyFitnessPal. A growing list of support resources can be found in our Eating Disorder Resources page.
If you would like to review the forum guidelines, please visit the following link:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/welcome/guidelines
At our discretion, this locked thread may be deleted entirely in the near future.
With respect,
JustSomeEm2
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 398.2K Introduce Yourself
- 44.7K Getting Started
- 261K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.4K Food and Nutrition
- 47.7K Recipes
- 233K Fitness and Exercise
- 462 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.5K Motivation and Support
- 8.4K Challenges
- 1.4K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 12 News and Announcements
- 21 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.6K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions





