Intermittent fasting

dws00
dws00 Posts: 159 Member
Has anyone tried, trying or have any negative or positive reviews of intermittent fasting? Thank you!
«1

Replies

  • Spliner1969
    Spliner1969 Posts: 3,233 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    My review is that no one can tell you what will work well for you and what won't. It won't help you lose weight any faster so the only reason to do it is if it helps you in some other way.

    This. I tried it for about 4 months. Made 0 difference in weight loss for me at all. Then again, I really wasn't trying to lose weight, I was trying to build muscle a bit faster and possible reduce some body fat and just wanted to see how IF would affect me if I used a very slight deficit. It actually gave me some digestion issues because I was trying to cram too many calories into that 8 hour period. I'm very active and my TDEE is usually at least 2500 calories a day if not much more some days. I spent that 4 months bloated and with indigestion issues that had gone away long ago. I've switched off of it now for about six weeks and feel much better moving back to splitting up my meals throughout the day. Maybe it works better for people who eat less calories a day, or those who eat more calorie dense foods.

    Some people swear by it, and I'd have to agree 100% with @NovusDies, if it works for you great! But don't expect to lose weight without a calorie deficit no matter which eating schedule you choose.

  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,753 Member
    I skip lunch or EFE. Eat fast eat. Nothing magical, it helps with staying within my calorie intake. I like bigger meals.
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    Agree with all of the above. I'd been off the forums for like a year, and was surprised to see how trendy IF (and keto) has gotten.

    It happens to be how I eat, because I've never been a breakfast (or lunch) person. I also like that I have plenty of calories for a large, substantial dinner, even when I'm cutting. However, it's very easy to not lose weight, or even gain, on IF if that is ALL you're doing; you still have to be eating at a deficit and that requires being cognizant of your calorie intake and expenditure.


    Yep. Gained almost all of my weight eating this way. I had no idea what IF was or that I was inadvertently doing it. I still don't call what I do an IF thing. It is just a ME thing.
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    If intermittent fasting helps you to stick to your calorie goals then great. but I have done IF 16:8 most of my life. some days I do 18:6. I have also not fasted just to see if there would be any difference. and There isnt . the only difference I seem to have is if I dont fast I want to eat everything in the house. when I fast I am less hungry. I dont have any insulin issues or anything like that so I dont know why that should make a difference but it does.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    edited April 2018
    Absolutely hated it. Spent 3 months trying to eat this way and was always starving.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    edited April 2018
    I liked 5:2 for weight loss.
    Like is probably too strong a word, disliked less than every day calorie restriction is more accurate. Suited my high exercise volume very well (training fully fuelled 5 days a week) and also my personality - determined short term/bored by routine.
    My weight loss was in proportion to my weekly calorie deficit.

    I disliked 16:8 for maintenance.
    Felt more restrictive than the same calorie allowance without a designated eating window although I'm a regular breakfast skipper. I don't respond well to arbitrary rules.
    Maintained on same calorie allowance as when I ate "normally".

    Learned something about myself from both approaches, worth a try but beyond being potentially being an easier way to adhere to a goal for some people it's not magic.
    A lot of the reported wondrous benefits are hyped out of all proportion, based on rodent studies or simply taken massively out of context.

  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    edited April 2018
    I've been doing it for years. I noticed way back in the 90's that when I was too busy with the kids and skipped breakfast, I was less hungry throughout the day.

    There's nothing magical about it by itself, though. I still reached my highest weight ever while skipping breakfast.

    Now I find that combining it with eating an appropriate number of calories works just fine for me, but it's just a tool that works for some people to help regulate appetite. Others do better eating regular meals. Overall calorie consumption and whatever makes dietary compliance easier for you is what matters.
  • PokeyBug
    PokeyBug Posts: 482 Member
    NovusDies wrote: »
    My review is that no one can tell you what will work well for you and what won't. It won't help you lose weight any faster so the only reason to do it is if it helps you in some other way.

    I agree with this advice. It works very well for me, because I'm one of those people who just isn't hungry before 3:00 pm or later. I find, on days I don't eat until dinner, I more than make up for waiting by eating more than I normally would, so it doesn't really cut my calories much. It does, however, help me manage my measly 1385 calories a day a little easier. #shortgirlproblems
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    If intermittent fasting helps you to stick to your calorie goals then great. but I have done IF 16:8 most of my life. some days I do 18:6. I have also not fasted just to see if there would be any difference. and There isnt . the only difference I seem to have is if I dont fast I want to eat everything in the house. when I fast I am less hungry. I dont have any insulin issues or anything like that so I dont know why that should make a difference but it does.

    Just curious, how sure are you that you don't have insulin issues? I do, my insulin levels are too high. I know this because I had a glucose tolerance test. Otherwise, I might not have ever known.

  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,099 Member
    I do 14/10 doe appetite control. Helps me some. Still track my macros though.
  • Danp
    Danp Posts: 1,561 Member
    I don't do a strict intermittent fasting regime but I've kind of fell into a pseudo-IF way of eating in that I tend to skip lunch. I'll have a light breakfast (and coffee!!) when I first get up in the morning at 6am then my next meal is dinner at 8pm. I will sometimes have a very light snack at about 4pm if I feel like it.

    I started doing this for a couple of reasons.

    Firstly I realised that I really wasn't very hungry at lunch and was only going out and getting something to eat because it was "lunch time". So I stopped and didn't feel any worse for wear (and it saved me money buying lunch).

    The second reason is I realised that no matter how much I ate at lunch I was always wanted a large dinner when I got home. While eating lunch I'd have to consciously restrict my dinner in order to keep within my calories. Skipping lunch means I have the calories left over that I can have the big nighttime meal that I enjoy.

    Yeah, so not really IF but it's been working for me =)
  • jessereysmith1993
    jessereysmith1993 Posts: 8 Member
    It will work man. But you don't need to do it to lose body fat.
  • leialeia79
    leialeia79 Posts: 17 Member
    I do 16/8 or 18/6 as my digestive system was shot to hell and it's the only thing that's calmed it down and made me stop feeling gassy all the time. It also balanced out my insulin levels as all my sugar cravings have eased off. I still eat three times a day, just between 12 - 8pm now, shutting my eating window immediately after dinner means less snacking and therefore it's easier to stay in my calorie allowance.
  • toxikon
    toxikon Posts: 2,383 Member
    I've been skipping breakfast for years now. IF definitely doesn't have any magical qualities, but it does help me control my calorie intake. I don't start getting hungry until around 11am, so it makes sense for me to save my calories for lunch and dinner. Lots of little frequent meals just makes me hungrier. Two large meals is the more satisfying option for me.
  • Martinez83014
    Martinez83014 Posts: 21 Member
    I only do 16:8 and use it to help keep me in a deficit. I make sure it is nutrient dense food, it is just easier to help keep under 1200 when I'm only eating 2 meals a day and maybe a snack or two rather than waking up and eating all day.
  • Megg82
    Megg82 Posts: 24 Member
    I love it. Just posted on another IF thread.
    I do 20 hr fast & 4 hr eating window.
    Personally I see HUGE benefits mentally and physically. Sharper focus and cognitive function, better mood and energy level, physical training is optimal in faster state (I’ve run my personal best 19 HRs into my fast & pushed my limits further strength training while fasted). My mind is clearer, no brain fog. It’s really great. I stopped tracking calories this past month but still lost inches. I’m small so I don’t do scales for weight, as I am trying to lose fat gain muscle and you can’t see that on a scale. I’m back to tracking calories this month to try to hardcore cut. I want a 6 pack & really defined muscles. My calves & thighs have remained the same size, I do a lot of squats and sprints. I am def stronger and see a difference in definition. But I want them cut and tight. I really enjoy IF and will not ever go back to a typical eating pattern. It’s easy and fits me & the benefits far exceed physical, I’m happy IFing.