We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Activity level and 10000 steps

jelleigh
Posts: 743 Member
Hey all,
So I did search this already and according to google, if I hit 10000 steps every day it would categorize me as active. Ive recently moved and have no car so this is a new habit for me but it means (according to MFP) I actually would increase my calorie intake to 1500 to lose 2 lbs per week . Does that sound right?
My stats
5'8"
SW 215
CW 188
GW 140-145
This week ive been hitting between 13000 - 16000 steps per day. I havent been eating back all the calories because I know the estimates are high
So I did search this already and according to google, if I hit 10000 steps every day it would categorize me as active. Ive recently moved and have no car so this is a new habit for me but it means (according to MFP) I actually would increase my calorie intake to 1500 to lose 2 lbs per week . Does that sound right?
My stats
5'8"
SW 215
CW 188
GW 140-145
This week ive been hitting between 13000 - 16000 steps per day. I havent been eating back all the calories because I know the estimates are high
0
Replies
-
have you been losing weight?
2 -
I just started this new routine this week so I think its a bit early to tell. Todays weigh in is lower but that could also be normal fluctuation.
I tried to edit my post for clarity but for some reason it wouldnt let me. I guess my question is : does over 10000 steps qualify as an active person? And am I right to not eat back the exercise calories and just stick to my 1500 cal goal?0 -
Do you have a FitBit or some other activity tracker synced with MFP?0
-
Personally getting 10000 steps doesn't mean a whole lot. There have been studies out there that people just getting 4000 steps and walking faster to get there heart rate up, actually did more than people just walking normal doing 10000 steps.7
-
WinoGelato wrote: »Do you have a FitBit or some other activity tracker synced with MFP?
Ya i have a fitbit synched which is why im getting exercise calories credited back. But maybe its estimating too high?0 -
WinoGelato wrote: »Do you have a FitBit or some other activity tracker synced with MFP?
Ya i have a fitbit synched which is why im getting exercise calories credited back. But maybe its estimating too high?
Not necessarily. If you are currently set to sedentary, and you are averaging higher than 10K steps (which you said this week it was 13-16K steps) then yes, you will see high exercise adjustments and you're right to think about changing your activity level.
Doing so, will provide you a higher baseline target, and then somewhat lower exercise adjustments, but no, you shouldn't ignore those. You may want to be cautious at first, about eating them back entirely, but many people, myself included, have found FItBit to be extremely accurate and have lost the weight I set out to lose eating back all of the exercise adjustments.
How FitBit and MFP work is that MFP has an estimate of how many calories it thinks you will burn in a day, based on the information you provided during set up. FitBit tells MFP how many calories it thinks you burn in total, which is a rough estimate of your TDEE. MFP then gives you an adjustment to "true up" to the amount you actually burned, still factoring in the deficit you've chosen. Bigger adjustments mean you are burning quite a bit more than MFP thought you would, but that doesn't mean they are inherently wrong. You're taking a lot of steps, and you burn a decent amount of calories doing that.
Also, with less than 50 lbs to lose, you should really be aiming for 1 lb/week rate of loss, not 2 lb/week. This will also raise your baseline calories...3 -
10k corresponds closer to active. At 16k you're exceeding very active. At 13k you're somewhere within very active using MFP categories.
Getting 4000 steps doing 100 meter dashes at the Olympics WILL burn more NET calories than shuffling 10k steps between your washroom and your living room.
This doesn't mean that the shuffling person doesn't get to spend more Calories doing the pee pee shuffle than what mfp's sedentary level (which tops at 3500 to 5000 steps at most) already includes!
Really.
Your calories don't give a hoot HOW you burned them...they only care WHETHER you did. And sedentary does not include 10k steps.
Whether your weight loss reflects these numbers is a different discussion that has to do with your logging, with how closely your expenditures are modeled by the equations we use, with your targetted deficit size and its appropriateness, and with your ability to detect your weight and fat level changes.7 -
WinoGelato wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »Do you have a FitBit or some other activity tracker synced with MFP?
Ya i have a fitbit synched which is why im getting exercise calories credited back. But maybe its estimating too high?
Not necessarily. If you are currently set to sedentary, and you are averaging higher than 10K steps (which you said this week it was 13-16K steps) then yes, you will see high exercise adjustments and you're right to think about changing your activity level.
Doing so, will provide you a higher baseline target, and then somewhat lower exercise adjustments, but no, you shouldn't ignore those. You may want to be cautious at first, about eating them back entirely, but many people, myself included, have found FItBit to be extremely accurate and have lost the weight I set out to lose eating back all of the exercise adjustments.
How FitBit and MFP work is that MFP has an estimate of how many calories it thinks you will burn in a day, based on the information you provided during set up. FitBit tells MFP how many calories it thinks you burn in total, which is a rough estimate of your TDEE. MFP then gives you an adjustment to "true up" to the amount you actually burned, still factoring in the deficit you've chosen. Bigger adjustments mean you are burning quite a bit more than MFP thought you would, but that doesn't mean they are inherently wrong. You're taking a lot of steps, and you burn a decent amount of calories doing that.
Also, with less than 50 lbs to lose, you should really be aiming for 1 lb/week rate of loss, not 2 lb/week. This will also raise your baseline calories...
I use this rationale; however I set my activity level at sedentary, set my daily calorie goal to sedentary TDEE less 500cals (for 1lb/wk weight loss) and try to stay under my daily calories. I figure any "exercise" calories the FitBit adjustment gives me are just "bonus". I don't necessarily eat them back unless logged an excess of 20,000 steps (usually due to a long hike or was super active with yardwork or the like) and hope that will result in a actual weight loss of over 1lb/week.3 -
Ok thanks everyone. I will maybe keep it at sedentary for a few weeks and eat back half or 75% of the exercise calories and go from there. I want ti make sure this activity level keeps up before i switch my profile to active.
Also since i do have 50 to lose (really I could probably lose 55-60 and still not be too light) is it bad to lose at 2 lbs for a bit? I know as i lose the deficit will decrease and wright loss will slow, but if I'm eating 1500 calories and burning 2500 thats still only a 1000 cal deficit and I'm well over the 1200 for nutrition. Or is it that I will lose muscle if I have that much deficit? And if I start lifting to maintain the muscle, can i keep the deficit at 1000?0 -
if you're obese a ~25% deficit is not excessive. If you're not obese a ~20% deficit is not excessive.
1000 Cal deficit on 2500 Cal sounds closer to ~40%.
Many people pursue such larger deficits. I think that these large deficits, by themselves, even when a lot of energy reserves are available and even more so when the energy reserves available to be lost are fewer, generate avoidable side-effects that lead to sub-optimal results. Most other people on these forums don't seem to think so. I note that the more reserves you have available the less problems you run into with large deficits.2 -
You're only about 25 lbs from the healthy weight range. I'm your height and about 5 lbs lighter and set to lose at 1 lb/wk. And please do eat back at least a portion of your exercise calories. They're calculated that way for a reason. Think about it this way, do you just want to get down to a healthy weight or do you want to successfully sustain that weight once you reach it? Slowing down your pace will help you learn how to sustain over the long run.
All the best.3 -
I notice that Map My Walk seems to use pace and elevation gain into the calculation for burn. I can't run anymore, but I can walk at 4+ mph and one of my common routes is very hilly. 4 miles of that gives me more calories that 4 miles of tooling around at 3 mph with less hills.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 260.5K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.7K Fitness and Exercise
- 444 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 931 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions