We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

polar heart rate monitor stingy with calories

jessazimmerman
jessazimmerman Posts: 14
edited October 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
My polar FT7 is saying I am using way fewer calories than my old timex for the same duration and average heart rate? What's going on? Anyone have ideas? The only difference I can see is that the polar has my age as one of the settings, and the timex didn't. Would that explain it?

Replies

  • aippolito1
    aippolito1 Posts: 4,894 Member
    It just might. Did you input your height, weight, sex also?
  • bunchesonothing
    bunchesonothing Posts: 1,015 Member
    They all use different calculations/equations based on the input from your body. It can't actually measure calorie burn. It estimates it based on your biofeedback.
  • sarah307
    sarah307 Posts: 1,363 Member
    polar HRMs are more accurate
  • yeabby
    yeabby Posts: 643 Member
    My polar FT7 is saying I am using way fewer calories than my old timex for the same duration and average heart rate? What's going on? Anyone have ideas? The only difference I can see is that the polar has my age as one of the settings, and the timex didn't. Would that explain it?

    FT7 has age as a setting and it has you do the fitness test when you first get it. I also had a Timex previous to the Polar. My guess is that the Polar is more accurate. I also don't know how long it was between the two. If you went a while between using the Timex and starting with Polar you may have become more fit. The more fit you are the less calories you burn.
  • yes, but that's the same in both. The timex doesn't ask for age. it's hard to believe that would explain a 300 calorie difference...
This discussion has been closed.