Package weight vs scale weight
Options
emmylootwo
Posts: 172 Member
Hey guys. I have a question for you! I'm used to weights being over the stated amount not under, so I'm a bit wary on how to approach this.
So my microwaved Mac and cheese package says a serving is 225g at 330 calories. The package says the total weight of the product is 340g aka ~499 calories for the meal.
But I weighed out the entire dish with my electronic scale at only 275g, or ~403 calories.
I guess 90-something calories in the long run isn't a huge deal but you know, if I eat this stuff on a regular basis, how should I log it? Would you use the higher package weight or the weight you yourself calculated?
Normally I round up and take the package weight but it's usually with low calorie things like green beans and such (i.e. Not a huge difference either way) Thoughts?
So my microwaved Mac and cheese package says a serving is 225g at 330 calories. The package says the total weight of the product is 340g aka ~499 calories for the meal.
But I weighed out the entire dish with my electronic scale at only 275g, or ~403 calories.
I guess 90-something calories in the long run isn't a huge deal but you know, if I eat this stuff on a regular basis, how should I log it? Would you use the higher package weight or the weight you yourself calculated?
Normally I round up and take the package weight but it's usually with low calorie things like green beans and such (i.e. Not a huge difference either way) Thoughts?
0
Replies
-
That's a big difference in weight! Assuming your scale is accurate (you could weigh something you know the weight of to check), I would take your weight instead of the weight on the packaging. That sounds kind of sketchy to be that far under, but that's a whole different matter from the weight loss aspect.2
-
I'd go with your weight. Out of curiosity, would you be able to post a pic of the label?1
-
-
I never go by what a package calls a serving or says the item weighs, as 9 times out of 10 the package is wrong. Like a slice of bread for example. The package says each slice weighs 35g yet each slice I weigh is different and can be up to 40g. A tin of beans the tin says contents is 400g I weighed it at 410g1
-
I wonder if the weight is cooked. The package doesn't specify.0
-
I have noticed this too, largely with canned beans.
For example, a serving of black beans is 1/2 cup (or as per the package, 130 grams/4.76 ounces). Supposedly there are 'about' 3.5 servings per can.
When draining and measuring 130 grams, I usually only get 2-2.5 servings, or about 10-13 ounces in total. I always thought it was because of me not using the bean juice.....2 -
musicfan68 wrote: »I wonder if the weight is cooked. The package doesn't specify.
It very rarely is, as cooked weight would depend how much the person decided to boil the pasta (meaning more water absorbed, heavier). I've seen people boil it to mush...1 -
Always go by weight. Did the package state a total weight or a net weight? The stated weight may include everything, including the wrapper and container. I would feel cheated if I bought a product and it was 20% lighter than stated
2 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x0Q3mrpNoI
If you can't watch
As long as you are consistent it won't matter.
Best of luck.1 -
amusedmonkey wrote: »Always go by weight. Did the package state a total weight or a net weight? The stated weight may include everything, including the wrapper and container. I would feel cheated if I bought a product and it was 20% lighter than stated
The picture she posted said ‘about 2’ servings - do not really surprised it’s less - that is pretty consistent with most packages I buy - abt 2 is normally 1.6-2.1 servings1 -
deannalfisher wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »Always go by weight. Did the package state a total weight or a net weight? The stated weight may include everything, including the wrapper and container. I would feel cheated if I bought a product and it was 20% lighter than stated
The picture she posted said ‘about 2’ servings - do not really surprised it’s less - that is pretty consistent with most packages I buy - abt 2 is normally 1.6-2.1 servings
But if the package contains "about 2" servings, then the whole thing should weigh double (450g). I suspect that the package is referring to weight once prepared. Although I could be reading this whole thing wrong. Rough day.0 -
emmylootwo wrote: »Hey guys. I have a question for you! I'm used to weights being over the stated amount not under, so I'm a bit wary on how to approach this.
So my microwaved Mac and cheese package says a serving is 225g at 330 calories. The package says the total weight of the product is 340g aka ~499 calories for the meal.
But I weighed out the entire dish with my electronic scale at only 275g, or ~403 calories.
I guess 90-something calories in the long run isn't a huge deal but you know, if I eat this stuff on a regular basis, how should I log it? Would you use the higher package weight or the weight you yourself calculated?
Normally I round up and take the package weight but it's usually with low calorie things like green beans and such (i.e. Not a huge difference either way) Thoughts?
if I am eating the whole thing(both servings) I weigh the whole thing(out of the box),write down that number, then I heat and eat and subtract whats left, if all thats left is say the bowl the product comes in I take that weight and subtract from the weight I got when I weighed the packagebefore cooking.
so with your package you weighed it(out of the Box I take it?). so you said it weighed 275,I take that number and once done I weight the remaining product(even if its just the bowl or whatever it came in and subtract that). so 275 -25 so that would be 250(just an estimate on what the bowl or container weighed). I take the 340g and divide it by the 250 which gives me 1.36 servings and I log that.Because that is what part of the meal I would be eating.1 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »Always go by weight. Did the package state a total weight or a net weight? The stated weight may include everything, including the wrapper and container. I would feel cheated if I bought a product and it was 20% lighter than stated
The picture she posted said ‘about 2’ servings - do not really surprised it’s less - that is pretty consistent with most packages I buy - abt 2 is normally 1.6-2.1 servings
But if the package contains "about 2" servings, then the whole thing should weigh double (450g). I suspect that the package is referring to weight once prepared. Although I could be reading this whole thing wrong. Rough day.
you would think that wouldl be the case. but often times the whole package weighs less than what 2 servings would be. heck I have weighed meals that were one serving say 320g and be only 200g after subtacting the bowl/container to heat it in. I have had this happen often and most companies will make it up to you if you complain its less than stated. while others dont care and suck at customer service.0 -
CharlieBeansmomTracey wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »deannalfisher wrote: »amusedmonkey wrote: »Always go by weight. Did the package state a total weight or a net weight? The stated weight may include everything, including the wrapper and container. I would feel cheated if I bought a product and it was 20% lighter than stated
The picture she posted said ‘about 2’ servings - do not really surprised it’s less - that is pretty consistent with most packages I buy - abt 2 is normally 1.6-2.1 servings
But if the package contains "about 2" servings, then the whole thing should weigh double (450g). I suspect that the package is referring to weight once prepared. Although I could be reading this whole thing wrong. Rough day.
you would think that wouldl be the case. but often times the whole package weighs less than what 2 servings would be. heck I have weighed meals that were one serving say 320g and be only 200g after subtacting the bowl/container to heat it in. I have had this happen often and most companies will make it up to you if you complain its less than stated. while others dont care and suck at customer service.
Interesting. I've never had that happen.0 -
I just realized a few weeks ago how crazy the difference can be. I was weighing the ice cream to figure out what the "damage" would be and was confused as the weight of the entire (small) tub was quite under what the weight on the package was. In some ways I was happy as it was happy to eat the two servings and was "saving" on calories
0 -
I haven't read all responses but manufacturers frequently provide more food than the label says. That's to allow for the fact that some containers will have less than expected, due to manufacturing differences.1
-
I haven't read all responses but manufacturers frequently provide more food than the label says. That's to allow for the fact that some containers will have less than expected, due to manufacturing differences.
and if you contact them and tell them that something is less than the package states they will tell you that happens but its not supposed to leave the facility,or at least thats what several companies have told me.1 -
There's often more in containers, especially in ready-made meals. The lowest difference I found lately was 200 grams smoked bacon slices that were only 2 grams heavier (I made four portions of pasta with it).0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.5K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 391 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 923 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions