Carbs

CassieJones104
CassieJones104 Posts: 76 Member
edited November 27 in Health and Weight Loss
How many carbs a day is considered low carb? What is the amount people usually stay under for weight loss?

Replies

  • nvmomketo
    nvmomketo Posts: 12,019 Member
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    BUT, I've seen someone who stays ketogenic (which is usually under 50g carbs) at around 200g, but he was VERY active and timed his carbs around exercise.

    I find under 20g carbs works best for me when losing weight because at that low of a carb level my appetite is greatly reduced so it becomes easier for me to eat less. YMMV
  • nutmegoreo
    nutmegoreo Posts: 15,532 Member
    fb47 wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This is my understanding as well.


    OP, I eat about 200 per day without any difficulties with losing weight. Low carb isn't necessary.

    Same here, I have days where I eat over 300g of carbs...sometimes I have to add in some fats, because I tend to be borderline low on fats sometimes and that's not good either, but for body composition, I still lose weight. Carbs have absolutely nothing to do with weight loss or weight gain, it's a macro just like protein and fats are.

    Fat seems to be my hardest to hit macro.
  • inertiastrength
    inertiastrength Posts: 2,343 Member
    edited July 2018
    I have about 175-200g daily, I consider that an average amount of carbs while I'm dieting down. And honestly, if 150g is "low carb" considering most sedentary people maintain on 1800ish cals it's no wonder people blame carbs for "making them fat"
    During maintenance I'll have about 300g/day
  • fb47
    fb47 Posts: 1,058 Member
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    fb47 wrote: »
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This is my understanding as well.


    OP, I eat about 200 per day without any difficulties with losing weight. Low carb isn't necessary.

    Same here, I have days where I eat over 300g of carbs...sometimes I have to add in some fats, because I tend to be borderline low on fats sometimes and that's not good either, but for body composition, I still lose weight. Carbs have absolutely nothing to do with weight loss or weight gain, it's a macro just like protein and fats are.

    Fat seems to be my hardest to hit macro.

    My problem is when I cut, my carbs are too high and fats low....when I bulk, I tend to go really high on fats simply because I have to eat a lot of calories.
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    edited July 2018
    I lost my big hunk of weight eating in the 100-150 gram of carbs range. Towards the end of that big weight loss I had some serious problems with feeling energetic in the gym but at the time I didn't know enough to consider that my carb level might have been causing it. Now when I cut I average around 200 carbs per day over the course of a week and I vary them by day based on my training schedule and I feel much better.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    What is the amount people usually stay under for weight loss?

    That's incredibly varied depending on macro preferences and calorie allowance which varies hugely depending on size of the individual, their activity and exercise.
    I hit 650g of carbs in a day once and was still in a substantial calorie deficit. I enjoy and function best on a relatively high carb diet, others will be the opposite.

    Which types of foods help you personally to thrive? Keep you satiated? Help you hit your calorie goal?
    Because really it's about you and your preferences and not about what "people" do.
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    i average 310-410g carbs a day and maintaining weight
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    mmapags wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This ^ is considered low carb. But there is no amount of carbs to stay under for weight loss. For weight loss, calories matter but macro nutrients not. For satiety and body composition, different macro mixes work for different people depending on their preferences and goals.

    Using this as a guideline (100-150), and assuming I average ~140 carbs/day BUT that comprises 38-42% of my calories due to the laws of nature being unfair being female, on the small side, and rather sedentary, is it still considered low carb?
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    mmapags wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This ^ is considered low carb. But there is no amount of carbs to stay under for weight loss. For weight loss, calories matter but macro nutrients not. For satiety and body composition, different macro mixes work for different people depending on their preferences and goals.

    Using this as a guideline (100-150), and assuming I average ~140 carbs/day BUT that comprises 38-42% of my calories due to the laws of nature being unfair being female, on the small side, and rather sedentary, is it still considered low carb?

    It may not be at 140. Maybe 120 or so. Does this matter to you? Are you trying to eat low carb?
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    mmapags wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    mmapags wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This ^ is considered low carb. But there is no amount of carbs to stay under for weight loss. For weight loss, calories matter but macro nutrients not. For satiety and body composition, different macro mixes work for different people depending on their preferences and goals.

    Using this as a guideline (100-150), and assuming I average ~140 carbs/day BUT that comprises 38-42% of my calories due to the laws of nature being unfair being female, on the small side, and rather sedentary, is it still considered low carb?

    It may not be at 140. Maybe 120 or so. Does this matter to you? Are you trying to eat low carb?

    Not in the least :smile: Just curious. Thanks!
  • mmapags
    mmapags Posts: 8,934 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    mmapags wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    mmapags wrote: »
    nvmomketo wrote: »
    Low carb is typically under 100-150g.

    This ^ is considered low carb. But there is no amount of carbs to stay under for weight loss. For weight loss, calories matter but macro nutrients not. For satiety and body composition, different macro mixes work for different people depending on their preferences and goals.

    Using this as a guideline (100-150), and assuming I average ~140 carbs/day BUT that comprises 38-42% of my calories due to the laws of nature being unfair being female, on the small side, and rather sedentary, is it still considered low carb?

    It may not be at 140. Maybe 120 or so. Does this matter to you? Are you trying to eat low carb?

    Not in the least :smile: Just curious. Thanks!

    Gotcha. No problem. ;)
  • leftsox
    leftsox Posts: 25 Member
    I do Keto, and stay around 20 net carbs
  • NovusDies
    NovusDies Posts: 8,940 Member
    nutmegoreo wrote: »
    Fat seems to be my hardest to hit macro.

    I don't pay attention to my fat macro enough apparently because it will occasionally bite me in the rear (or at least it feels that way when "things" move too slow). It is a touch hypocritical since I am always praising the virtues of a varied diet but I am not perfect and I slip into a rut now and again. Crazily my ruts seem to be eating too much lean protein. Moderation is not just for the pizza and the ice cream...
This discussion has been closed.